Bias

Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Javier Llorca, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Javier Llorca

Abstract

The concept of bias is the lack of internal validity or incorrect assessment of the association between an exposure and an effect in the target population in which the statistic estimated has an expectation that does not equal the true value. Biases can be classified by the research stage in which they occur or by the direction of change in a estimate. The most important biases are those produced in the definition and selection of the study population, data collection, and the association between different determinants of an effect in the population. A definition of the most common biases occurring in these stages is given.

References

    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1981 Apr;113(4):452-63
    1. Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12:281-307
    1. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jun 20;312(25):1604-8
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1985 Oct;145(10):1873-5
    1. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(7):495-504
    1. Epidemiology. 1992 Nov;3(6):477-82
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;45(10):1143-54
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Jan;46(1):57-63
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Apr;46(4):341-8
    1. Br J Cancer. 1993 Oct;68(4):647-50
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Sep 15;138(6):453-61
    1. Epidemiology. 1994 Mar;5(2):189-96
    1. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 4;331(5):300-2
    1. Stat Med. 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15;13(5-7):557-67
    1. BMJ. 1994 Sep 24;309(6957):780
    1. JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408-12
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Aug;47(8):825-7
    1. Epidemiology. 1995 Sep;6(5):511-9
    1. J Public Health Med. 1995 Dec;17(4):419-28
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jun 1;124(11):999-1005
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;25(6):1107-16
    1. Lancet. 1997 Aug 2;350(9074):326-9
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Sep 1;146(5):429-38
    1. Stat Methods Med Res. 1998 Dec;7(4):337-53
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Jun 1;149(11):981-3
    1. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(10):1-115
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000 Aug;26(4):363-7
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;53(11):1119-29
    1. Epidemiology. 2001 Jan;12(1):114-22
    1. Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1191-4
    1. Stat Med. 2001 May 15-30;20(9-10):1373-85
    1. Lancet. 2002 Feb 23;359(9307):696-700
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):115-23
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;55(4):407-10
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;31(2):422-9
    1. JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2847-50
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Oct;31(5):1030-7
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Apr;56(4):293-6
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1976 Nov;104(5):493-8
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1977 May;105(5):488-95
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1977 Sep;106(3):184-7
    1. N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 26;299(17):926-30
    1. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(1-2):51-63
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Apr;111(4):444-52
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Oct;112(4):564-9
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Aug;52(8):731-5
    1. Science. 1955 Sep 2;122(3166):401-6
    1. Epidemiology. 1996 Jul;7(4):335-6
    1. Lancet. 1988 Dec 3;2(8623):1267-73
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(5):395-401
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Dec;18(4):985-9
    1. Lancet. 1990 Mar 31;335(8692):765-74
    1. Med Clin (Barc). 1990 Jan 13;94(1):9-11
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Oct;132(4):746-8
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(12):1337-41
    1. Epidemiology. 1990 Jul;1(4):273-84
    1. J Chronic Dis. 1981;34(8):393-403

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren