Reduced expiratory variability index (EVI) is associated with controller medication withdrawal and symptoms in wheezy children aged 1-5 years

Ville-Pekka Seppä, Marita Paassilta, Juho Kivistö, Anton Hult, Jari Viik, Javier Gracia-Tabuenca, Jussi Karjalainen, Ville-Pekka Seppä, Marita Paassilta, Juho Kivistö, Anton Hult, Jari Viik, Javier Gracia-Tabuenca, Jussi Karjalainen

Abstract

Background: Lung function testing is an essential part of diagnostic workup and monitoring of asthma, but young children are lacking easy, routine testing methods. However, recent discoveries show reduced tidal breathing variability measured using impedance pneumography (IP) at home during sleep as a sign of airway obstruction. In this study, we assessed (a) the discriminative capacity of expiratory variability index (EVI) between healthy controls and young children with recurrent wheeze on-and-off controller medication, (b) association between EVI and parentally perceived obstructive symptoms (need for bronchodilator) and (c) measurement success rate.

Methods: We included 68 patients (aged 1.0-5.6) and 40 healthy controls (aged 1.0-5.9 years). The patients were prescribed a three-month inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment due to recurrent obstructive bronchitis. We measured EVI using IP at home at the end of the treatment (0W) and 2 (2W) and 4 (4W) weeks after ICS withdrawal.

Results: EVI was higher in controls than in patients, and significant within-patient reduction occurred at 4W as compared to 2W or 0W. Area under curve of the ROC curve (controls vs all patients) at 4W was 0.78 (95% CI 0.70-0.85). Children who were administered bronchodilator by parental decision had lower EVI than those without bronchodilator need at 4W, but not at 0W or 2W. Patients with parent-reported airway infection, but no bronchodilator need, had normal EVI. Measurement success rate was 94%.

Conclusion: EVI was lower in patients than in controls and it reduced further after controller medication withdrawal, especially in the presence of parentally perceived wheeze symptoms. This technique shows a significant potential for routine lung function testing of wheezy young children.

Keywords: asthma; home monitoring; lung function; obstruction; paediatric; tidal breathing; wheeze.

Conflict of interest statement

VPS and JV hold patents relating to impedance pneumography. VPS and AH are employees of Revenio Group Corporation that commercialises impedance pneumography technology. JK reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Novartis, Orion Pharma and Teva outside the submitted work. MP, JK and JGT have no conflict of interest to disclose.

© 2020 The Authors. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sketch of the impedance pneumography (IP) measurement set‐up
Figure 2
Figure 2
Measured expiratory variability index (EVI) values in controls and patients at different time points. P values shown only for within‐patient changes. The rectangle covers 25th‐75th percentile range and the whiskers extend to extremes, excluding outliers, defined as being farther than 1.5 times IQR from the closer quartile. The line in the middle denotes median
Figure 3
Figure 3
Discriminative capacity of expiratory variability index (EVI) presented by ROC curve between controls (115 measurements) and all patients and patients with (BD+) or without (BD−) bronchodilator use at 4W time point
Figure 4
Figure 4
Expiratory variability index (EVI) values with respect to limits of normal, study time points (0W, 2W, 4W) and bronchodilator (BD) use. BD+ and BD− indicate bronchodilator was or was not used, respectively, during the EVI measurement day or night. Numbers within the bars refer to the number of patients in each category. Panel A shows the EVI values presented with respect to the 5th and 10th percentiles of the EVI values of the controls (12.0 and 14.0, respectively). Panel B shows the EVI change from 0W to 4W presented with respect to the 5th and 95th percentiles of the changes in the controls (−3.3 and +3.3, respectively)

References

    1. NHLBI Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR‐3): guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma‐summary report 2007. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(5 Suppl):S94‐S138.
    1. Moeller A, Carlsen K‐H, Sly PD, et al. Monitoring asthma in childhood: lung function, bronchial responsiveness and inflammation. Eur Respir Rev. 2015;24(136):204‐215.
    1. Gustafsson PM, Watson L, Davis KJ, Rabe KF. Poor asthma control in children: evidence from epidemiological surveys and implications for clinical practice. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60(3):321‐334.
    1. Vahlkvist S, Inman MD, Pedersen S. Effect of asthma treatment on fitness, daily activity and body composition in children with asthma. Allergy. 2010;65(11):1464‐1471.
    1. Milton B, Whitehead M, Holland P, Hamilton V. The social and economic consequences of childhood asthma across the lifecourse: a systematic review. Child Care Health Dev. 2004;30(6):711‐728.
    1. Haselkorn T, Fish JE, Zeiger RS, et al. Consistently very poorly controlled asthma, as defined by the impairment domain of the Expert Panel Report 3 guidelines, increases risk for future severe asthma exacerbations in The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(5):895‐902.e4.
    1. Håland G, Lødrup‐Carlsen K, Sandvik L, et al. Reduced lung function at birth and the risk of asthma at 10 years of age. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(16):1682‐1689.
    1. Gracia‐Tabuenca J, Seppä V‐P, Jauhiainen M, et al. Tidal breathing flow volume profiles during sleep in wheezing infants measured by impedance pneumography. J Appl Physiol. 2019;126(5):1409‐1418.
    1. Gracia‐Tabuenca J, Seppä V‐P, Jauhiainen M, Paassilta M, Viik J, Karjalainen J. Tidal breathing flow profiles during sleep in wheezing children measured by impedance pneumography. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2019;271 Article number 103312. 10.1016/j.resp.2019.103312
    1. Dames KK, Lopes AJ, de Melo PL. Airflow pattern complexity during resting breathing in patients with COPD: effect of airway obstruction. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2014;192:39‐47.
    1. Veiga J, Lopes AJ, Jansen JM, Melo PL. Airflow pattern complexity and airway obstruction in asthma. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(2):412‐419.
    1. Usemann J, Suter A, Zannin E, et al. Variability of tidal breathing parameters in preterm infants and associations with respiratory morbidity during infancy: a cohort study. J Pediatr. 2019;205:61‐69.e1.
    1. Hmeidi H, Motamedi‐Fakhr S, Chadwick EK, et al. Tidal breathing parameters measured by structured light plethysmography in children aged 2–12 years recovering from acute asthma/wheeze compared with healthy children. Physiol Rep. 2018;6(12):e13752.
    1. Seppä V‐P, Pelkonen AS, Kotaniemi‐Syrjänen A, Viik J, Mäkelä MJ, Malmberg LP. Tidal flow variability measured by impedance pneumography relates to childhood asthma risk. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(6):1687‐1696.
    1. Seppä V‐P, Hult A, Gracia‐Tabuenca J, et al. Airway obstruction is associated with reduced variability in specific parts of the tidal breathing flow–volume curve in young children. ERJ Open Res. 2019;5(2). 10.1183/23120541.00028-2019
    1. Haahtela T, Lehtimäki L, Ahonen E, et al. Update on current care guidelines: asthma. Duodecim. 2013;129(9):994‐995.
    1. Chang TS, Lemanske RF, Guilbert TW, et al. Evaluation of the Modified Asthma Predictive Index in high‐risk preschool children. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013;1(2):152‐156.
    1. Malmberg LP, Seppä V‐P, Kotaniemi‐Syrjänen A, et al. Measurement of tidal breathing flows in infants using impedance pneumography. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(2). Article number 1600926. 10.1183/13993003.00926-2016
    1. Seppä V‐P, Pelkonen AS, Kotaniemi‐Syrjänen A, Mäkelä MJ, Viik J, Malmberg LP. Tidal breathing flow measurement in awake young children by using impedance pneumography. J Appl Physiol. 2013;115(11):1725‐1731.
    1. Thamrin C, Frey U, Kaminsky DA, et al. Systems biology and clinical practice in respiratory medicine. The Twain Shall Meet. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(9):1053‐1061.
    1. Frey U, Maksym G, Suki B. Temporal complexity in clinical manifestations of lung disease. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110(6):1723‐1731.
    1. Hult A, Juraški RG, Gracia‐Tabuenca J, Partinen M, Plavec D, Seppä V‐P. Sources of variability in expiratory flow profiles during sleep in healthy young children. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020;274:103352.
    1. Dundas I, Chan EY, Bridge PD, McKenzie SA. Diagnostic accuracy of bronchodilator responsiveness in wheezy children. Thorax. 2005;60(1):13‐16.
    1. Galant SP, Morphew T, Amaro S, Liao O. Value of the bronchodilator response in assessing controller naïve asthmatic children. J Pediatr. 2007;151(5):457‐462.e1.
    1. Tse SM, Gold DR, Sordillo JE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the bronchodilator response in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(3):554‐559.e5.
    1. Busi LE, Restuccia S, Tourres R, Sly PD. Assessing bronchodilator response in preschool children using spirometry. Thorax. 2017;72(4):367‐372.
    1. Song TW, Kim KW, Kim ES, Park J‐W, Sohn MH, Kim K‐E. Utility of impulse oscillometry in young children with asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2008;19(8):763‐768.
    1. Malmberg LP, Pelkonen AS, Haahtela T, Turpeinen M. Exhaled nitric oxide rather than lung function distinguishes preschool children with probable asthma. Thorax. 2003;58(6):494‐499.
    1. Beydon N, Pin I, Matran R, et al. Pulmonary function tests in preschool children with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168(6):640‐644.
    1. Jaakola S, Lyytikäinen O, Rimhanen‐Finne R, et al.Infectious diseases in Finland 2016. THL; 2017. . Accessed January 21, 2020.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren