Neural blockade anaesthesia of the mandibular nerve and its terminal branches: rationale for different anaesthetic techniques including their advantages and disadvantages

Jason Khoury, Grant Townsend, Jason Khoury, Grant Townsend

Abstract

Anaesthesia of structures innervated by the mandibular nerve is necessary to provide adequate pain control when performing dental and localised surgical procedures. To date, numerous techniques have been described and, although many of these methods are not used routinely, there are some situations where their application may be indicated. Patient factors as well as anatomical variability of the mandibular nerve and associated structures dictate that no one technique can be universally applied with a 100% success rate. This fact has led to a proliferation of alternative techniques that have appeared in the literature. This selective review of the literature provides a brief description of the different techniques available to the clinician as well as the underlying anatomy which is fundamental to successfully anaesthetising the mandibular nerve.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transverse section of the mandibular ramus at the level just superior to the lingula. (R: Ramus, IAN: inferior alveolar nerve, IAV: inferior alveolar vein, IAA: inferior alveolar artery, SML: sphenomandibular ligament, MP: medial pterygoid muscle, B: buccinator, PMR: pterygomandibular raphe, SCM: superior constrictor muscle, TT: tendon of temporalis L: lingula). The needle is shown passing through the pterygomandibular space where it is directed to an area of bone just superior to the lingula, L. This is the level at which an IANB should be administered.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Photograph of the mandible where the needle tip is directed toward the area of bone just superior to the lingula. This positioning of the needle will allow for local anaesthetic deposition in a location in close proximity to the IAN and associated vessels, yet minimising the risk of damaging them. This photograph reflects where local anaesthetic is injected with the direct and indirect IANB (CN: Coronoid notch, L: Lingula).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoral photograph of the left side of the oral cavity showing the injection sites for different mandibular block techniques. The pterygotemporal depression exists between the pterygomandibular fold and coronoid notch and represents the area where a direct or indirect IANB is administered in the mediolateral plane. The height at which this block is given is approximately the level of the coronoid notch. In contrast, the Gow-Gates mandibular block is administered at a much higher level. The mesiopalatal cusp of the upper second molar determines the height of the injection while the site in the mediolateral plane is the area of tissue just posterior to the upper second or third molar (PTD: pterygotemporal depression, PMF: pterygomandibular fold, CN: coronoid notch, 1: area where a direct/indirect IANB would be administered, 2: area where a Gow-Gates mandibular block would be administered).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Photograph of the mandible showing the positioning of the needle tip when administering the anterior IANB. Note that the location of the needle tip is a considerable distance from where the IAN would be expected. This technique relies heavily on the ability of local anaesthetic to diffuse throughout the pterygomandibular space (NC: neck of Condyle, CP: coronoid process, L: lingula).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Photograph of the mandible showing the ideal needle tip position when administering the Gow-Gates mandibular block technique. The intended target area for the needle is the lateral condylar neck region, below the insertion of the lateral pterygoid muscle and the attachment of ligaments associated with the temporomandibular capsule (CN: condylar neck, CP: coronoid process).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Photograph of the mandibular ramus from a medial view showing the needle tip positioning required for the Akinosi closed mouth mandibular nerve block technique. Note that the needle should not contact bone during needle insertion. The needle tip slips along the medial aspect of the ramus to its intended target area, the loose areolar tissue within the superior reach of the pterygomadibular space (CN: condylar neck, CP: coronoid process, L: lingula).

References

    1. Malamed S. Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 5th edition. St. Louis, Mo, USA: Mosby; 2004.
    1. Khoury J, Mihailidis S, Ghabriel M, Townsend G. Applied anatomy of the pterygomandibular space: improving the success of inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Australian Dental Journal. 2011;56(2):112–121.
    1. Sicher H, Du Brul E. Oral anatomy. 6th edition. St. Louis, Mo, USA: C.V. Mosby; 1975.
    1. Akinosi JO. A new approach to the mandibular nerve block. British Journal of Oral Surgery. 1977;15(1):83–87.
    1. Gow-Gates GAE. Mandibular conduction anesthesia: a new technique using extraoral landmarks. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology. 1973;36(3):321–330.
    1. Cousins M, Bridenbaugh P. Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain. 3rd edition. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.
    1. Takasugi Y, Furuya H, Moriya K, Okamoto Y. Clinical evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve block by injection into the pterygomandibular space anterior to the mandibular foramen. Anesthesia Progress. 2000;47(4):125–129.
    1. Shields PW. Further observations on mandibular anaesthesia. Australian Dental Journal. 1977;22(5):334–337.
    1. Huelke D. Selected Dissections of the Facial Regions for Advanced Dental Students. 6th edition. Ann Arbor, Mich, USA: Overbeck; 1973.
    1. Barker BCW, Davies PL. The applied anatomy of the pterygomandibular space. British Journal of Oral Surgery. 1972;10(1):43–55.
    1. Berns JM, Sadove MS. Mandibular block injection: a method of study using an injected radiopaque material. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1962;65:735–745.
    1. Garg A, Townsend G. Anatomical variation of the sphenomandibular ligament. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2001;27(1):22–24.
    1. Johnson TM, Badovinac R, Shaefer J. Teaching alternatives to the standard inferior alveolar nerve block in dental education: outcomes in clinical practice. Journal of Dental Education. 2007;71(9):1145–1152.
    1. Murphy TR, Grundy EM. The inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle at the mandibular foramen. The Dental practitioner and dental record. 1969;20(2):41–48.
    1. Shinagawa A, Chin VKL, Rabbani SR, Campos AC. A novel approach to intraoral mandibular nerve anesthesia: changing reference planes in the Gow-Gates block technique. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009;67(12):2609–2616.
    1. Kafalias MC, Gow-Gates GAE, Saliba GJ. The Gow-Gates technique for mandibular block anesthesia. A discussion and a mathematical analysis. Anesthesia Progress. 1987;34(4):142–149.
    1. Gow-Gates G, Watson JE. Gow-Gates mandibular Block—applied anatomy and histology. Anesthesia Progress. 1989;36(4-5):193–195.
    1. Donkor P, Wong J. A mandibular block technique useful in ’gaggers’. Australian Dental Journal. 1991;36(1):47–50.
    1. Yücel E, Hutchison IL. A comparative evaluation of the conventional and closed-mouth technique for inferior alveolar nerve block. Australian dental journal. 1995;40(1):15–16.
    1. Lew K, Townsend G. Failure to obtain adequate anaesthesia associated with a bifid mandibular canal: a case report. Australian Dental Journal. 2006;51(1):86–90.
    1. Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block. International Endodontic Journal. 2009;42(3):238–246.
    1. Haase A, Reader AL, Nusstein J, Beck M, Drum M. Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2008;139(9):1228–1235.
    1. Clark K, Reader A, Beck M, Meyers WJ. Anesthetic efficacy of an infiltration in mandibular anterior teeth following an inferior alveolar nerve block. Anesthesia progress. 2002;49(2):49–55.
    1. Foster W, Drum M, Reader A, Beck M. Anesthetic efficacy of buccal and lingual infiltrations of lidocaine following an inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular posterior teeth. Anesthesia Progress. 2007;54(4):163–169.
    1. Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study. Journal of Endodontics. 2006;32(4):296–298.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren