A systematic review, and meta-analyses, of the impact of health-related claims on dietary choices

Asha Kaur, Peter Scarborough, Mike Rayner, Asha Kaur, Peter Scarborough, Mike Rayner

Abstract

Background: Health-related claims are statements regarding the nutritional content of a food (nutrition claims) and/or indicate that a relationship exists between a food and a health outcome (health claims). Their impact on food purchasing or consumption decisions is unclear. This systematic review measured the effect of health-related claims, on pre-packaged foods in retail settings, on adult purchasing decisions (real and perceived).

Methods: In September 2016, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CAB abstracts, Business Source Complete, and Web of Science/Science Citation Index & Social Science Citation Index for articles in English published in peer-review journals. Studies were included if they were controlled experiments where the experimental group(s) included a health-related claim and the control group involved an identical product without a health-related claim. Included studies measured (at an individual or population level); actual or intended choice, purchases, and/or consumption. The primary outcome was product choices and purchases, the secondary outcome was food consumption and preference. Results were standardised through calculating odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the likelihood of choosing a product when a health-related claim was present. Results were combined in a random-effects meta-analysis.

Results: Thirty-one papers were identified, 17 of which were included for meta-analyses. Most studies were conducted in Europe (n = 17) and the USA (n = 7). Identified studies were choice experiments that measured the likelihood of a product being chosen when a claim was present compared to when a claim was not present, (n = 16), 15 studies were experiments that measured either; intent-rating scale outcomes (n = 8), consumption (n = 6), a combination of the two (n = 1), or purchase data (n = 1). Overall, 20 studies found that claims increase purchasing and/or consumption, eight studies had mixed results, and two studies found consumption/purchasing reductions. The meta-analyses of 17 studies found that health-related claims increase consumption and/or purchasing (OR 1.75, CI 1.60-1.91).

Conclusion: Health-related claims have a substantial effect on dietary choices. However, this finding is based on research mostly conducted in artificial settings. Findings from natural experiments have yielded smaller effects. Further research is needed to assess effects of claims in real-world settings.

Trial registration: PROSPERO systematic review registration number: CRD42016044042 .

Keywords: Food choices; Food labelling; Health claims; Nutrition claims.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prisma flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot for the effect of health-related claims on dietary choices, by claim type
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot for the effect of health-related claims on dietary choices, by eatwell food group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Funnel plot for publication bias (with pseudo 95% confidence limits)

References

    1. GBD 2015 risk factors collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1659–1724. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8.
    1. World Health Organization. Health diet: Fact sheet N°394. (2015). Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
    1. Campos S, Doxey J, Hammond D. Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14:1496–1506. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010003290.
    1. Cowburn G, Stockley L. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8:21–28. doi: 10.1079/PHN2005666.
    1. European CCommission Regulation (EC) no. 1924/2006 of the European parliament and of the council of 20th December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. Off J Eur Union. 2006;404:9–25.
    1. Hieke S, Kuljanic N, Pravst I, Miklavec K, Kaur A, Brown KA, Egan BM, Pfeifer K, Gracia A, Rayner M. Prevalence of nutrition and health-related claims on pre-packaged foods: a five-country study in Europe. Nutrients. 2016;8:137. doi: 10.3390/nu8030137.
    1. Thorndike AN, Sonnenberg L, Riis J, Barraclough S, Levy DE. A 2-phase labeling and choice architecture intervention to improve healthy food and beverage choices. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:527–533. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300391.
    1. Hawley KL, Roberto CA, Bragg MA, Liu PJ, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. The science on front-of-package food labels. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16:430–439. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012000754.
    1. Hawkes C. Noncommunicable diseases and mental health cluster. 2004. Nutrition labels and health claims: the global regulatory environment Geneva: World Health Organization.
    1. Mariotti F, Kalonji E, Huneau JF, Margaritis I. Potential pitfalls of health claims from a public health nutrition perspective. Nutr Rev. 2010;68:624–638. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00322.x.
    1. Roe B, Levy AS, Derby BM. The impact of health claims on consumer search and product evaluation outcomes: Results from FDA experimental data. J Public Policy Mark. 1999;18:89–105.
    1. Williams P. Consumer understanding and use of health claims for foods. Nutr Rev. 2005;63:256–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00382.x.
    1. Chandon P, Wansink B. The biasing health halos of fast food restaurant health claims: lower calorie estimates and higher side dish consumption intentions. J Consum Res. 2007;34:301–314. doi: 10.1086/519499.
    1. Wansink B, Chandon P. Can "low-fat" nutrition labels lead to obesity? J Mark Res. 2006;43:605–617. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.43.4.605.
    1. Berning J, Chouinard H, McCluskey J. Do positive nutrition shelf labels affect consumer behavior? Findings from a field experiment with scanner data. Am J Agric Econ. 2010;93:364–369.
    1. Raghunathan R, Naylor R, Hoyer W. The unhealthy = tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. J Mark. 2006;70:170–184. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.70.4.170.
    1. Paul G, Ink S, Geiger C. The Quaker oats health claim. J Nutraceuticals Funct Med Foods. 1999;1:5–32. doi: 10.1300/J133v01n04_02.
    1. Shemilt I, Hendry V, Marteau TM. What do we know about the effects of exposure to ‘low alcohol’ and equivalent product labelling on the amounts of alcohol, food and tobacco people select and consume? A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:29. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3956-2.
    1. University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. Asha Kaur, Peter Scarborough, Mike Rayner. A systematic review of the impact of health-related claims on dietary choices. PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016044042 Available from . Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
    1. Rayner M, Wood A, Lawrence M, Mhurchu C, Albert J, Barquera S, Friel S, Hawkes C, Kelly B, Kumanyika S, et al. Monitoring the health-related labelling of foods and non-alcoholic beverages in retail settings. Obes Rev. 2013;14(Suppl 1):70–81. doi: 10.1111/obr.12077.
    1. Codex Alimentarious: Guidelines for use of nutrition and health claims CAC/GL 23–1997. (1997). Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
    1. Higgins J, Altman D, Gotzsche P, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman A, Savovic J, Schulz K, Weeks L, Sterne J. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
    1. Public Health England. The Eatwell Guide. (2016). Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
    1. StataCorp . Stata statistical software: release 11. College Station, Texas: StataCorp LP; 2009.
    1. Ares G, Gimenez A, Gambaro A. Influence of nutritional knowledge on perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional foods. Appetite. 2008;51:663–668. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.05.061.
    1. Ares G, Gimenez A, Gambaro A. Consumer perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional milk desserts. Influence of ingredient, ingredient name and health claim. Food Qual Prefer. 2009;20:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.07.002.
    1. Ares G, Gimenez A, Deliza R. Influence of three non-sensory factors on consumer choice of functional yogurts over regular ones. Food Qual Prefer. 2010;21:361–367. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.09.002.
    1. Aschemann-Witzel J, Hamm U. Do consumers prefer foods with nutrition and health claims? Results of a purchase simulation. J Mark Commun. 2010;16:47–58. doi: 10.1080/13527260903342746.
    1. Aschemann-Witzel J, Maroscheck N, Hamm U. Are organic consumers preferring or avoiding foods with nutrition and health claims? Food Qual Prefer. 2013;30:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.04.011.
    1. Barreiro-Hurle J, Gracia A, de-Magistris T. The effects of multiple health and nutrition labels on consumer food choices. J Agric Econ. 2010;61:426–443. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00247.x.
    1. Belei N, Geyskens K, Goukens C, Ramanathan S, Lemmink J. The best of both worlds? Effects of attribute-induced goal conflict on consumption of healthful indulgences. J Mark Res. 2012;49:900–909. doi: 10.1509/jmr.10.0155.
    1. Carbonneau E, Perron J, Drapeau V, Lamarche B, Doucet E, Pomerleau S, Provencher V. Impact of nutritional labelling on 10-d energy intake, appetite perceptions and attitudes towards food. Br J Nutr. 2015;114:2138–2147. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515003918.
    1. Casini L, Contini C, Marinelli N, Romano C, Scozzafava G. Nutraceutical olive oil: does it make the difference? Nutr Food Sci. 2014;44:586–600. doi: 10.1108/NFS-09-2013-0102.
    1. Coleman KL, Miah EM, Morris GA, Morris C. Impact of health claims in prebiotic-enriched breads on purchase intent, emotional response and product liking. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2014;65:164–171. doi: 10.3109/09637486.2013.836744.
    1. Contini C, Casini L, Stefan V, Romano C, Juhl HJ, Lahteenmaki L, Scozzafava G, Grunert KG. Some like it healthy: can socio-demographic characteristics serve as predictors for a healthy food choice? Food Qual Prefer. 2015;46:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.07.009.
    1. de-Magistris T, Lopez-Galan B. Consumers' willingness to pay for nutritional claims fighting the obesity epidemic: the case of reduced-fat and low salt cheese in Spain. Public Health. 2016;135:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.02.004.
    1. Fernandez-Polanco J, Loose SM, Luna L. Are retailers' preferences for seafood attributes predictive for consumer wants? Results from a choice experiment for seabream. Aquaculture Econ Manage. 2013;17:103–122. doi: 10.1080/13657305.2013.772262.
    1. Gracia A, Loureiro ML, Nayga RM., Jr Consumers' valuation of nutritional information: a choice experiment study. Food Qual Prefer. 2009;20:463–471. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.03.010.
    1. Kiesel K, Villas-Boas SB. Can information costs affect consumer choice? Nutritional labels in a supermarket experiment. Int J Ind Organ. 2013;31:153–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.11.002.
    1. Koenigstorfer J, Groeppel-Klein A, Kettenbaum M, Klicker K. Eat fit. Get big? How fitness cues influence food consumption volumes. Appetite. 2013;65:165–169. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.011.
    1. Kozup JC, Creyer EH, Burton S. Making healthful food choices: the influence of health claims and nutrition information on consumers' evaluations of packaged food products and restaurant menu items. J Mark. 2003;67:19–34. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.67.2.19.18608.
    1. Krystallis A, Chrysochou P. Do health claims and prior awareness influence Consumers' preferences for unhealthy foods? The case of functional Children's snacks. Agribusiness. 2012;28:86–102. doi: 10.1002/agr.20285.
    1. Lin Y, Lee Y, Wang Y. Exploring the influence of tea beverage health claims on brand evaluation and purchase intention. Int J Organ Innov. 2015;8:88–99.
    1. Loose S, Peschel A, Grebitus C. Quantifying effects of convenience and product packaging on consumer preferences and market share of seafood products: the case of oysters. Food Qual Prefer. 2013;28:492–504. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.11.004.
    1. De Marchi E, Caputo V, Nayga R, Jr, Banterle A. Time preferences and food choices: evidence from a choice experiment. Food Policy. 2016;62:99–109. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.05.004.
    1. Maubach N, Hoek J, Mather D. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations. Appetite. 2014;82:67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.006.
    1. McLean R, Hoek J, Hedderley D. Effects of alternative label formats on choice of high- and low-sodium products in a New Zealand population sample. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15:783–791. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011003508.
    1. Mohebalian P, Cernusca M, Aguilar F. Discovering niche markets for elderberry juice in the United States. HortTechnology. 2012;22:556–566.
    1. Mohebalian P, Aguilar F, Cernusca M. Conjoint analysis of US Consumers' preference for elderberry jelly and juice products. Hortscience. 2013;48:338–346.
    1. Moon W, Balasubramanian S, Rimal A. Health claims and consumers' behavioral intentions: the case of soy-based food. Food Policy. 2011;36:480–489. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.05.001.
    1. Orquin J, Scholderer J. Consumer judgments of explicit and implied health claims on foods: misguided but not misled. Food Policy. 2015;51:144–157. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.01.001.
    1. Roberto C, Shivaram M, Martinez O, Boles C, Harris JL, Brownell KD. The smart choices front-of-package nutrition label. Influence on perceptions and intake of cereal. Appetite. 2012;58:651–657. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.003.
    1. Steenhuis I, Kroeze W, Vyth E, Valk S, Verbauwen R, Seidell J. The effects of using a nutrition logo on consumption and product evaluation of a sweet pastry. Appetite. 2010;55:707–709. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.07.013.
    1. Wezemael L, Caputo V, Nayga R, Jr, Chryssochoidis G, Verbeke W. European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: a multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments. Food Policy. 2014;44:167–176. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.11.006.
    1. Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310.
    1. The Choices Programme. / (2014). Acessed 13 Feb 2017.
    1. Van den Noortgate W, López-López J, Marín-Martínez F, Sánchez-Meca J. Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes: a multilevel approach. Behav Res Methods. 2015;47:1274–1294. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0527-2.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren