Phase II study of whole brain radiotherapy with or without erlotinib in patients with multiple brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma

Hongqing Zhuang, Zhiyong Yuan, Jun Wang, Lujun Zhao, Qingsong Pang, Ping Wang, Hongqing Zhuang, Zhiyong Yuan, Jun Wang, Lujun Zhao, Qingsong Pang, Ping Wang

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore the efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) versus WBRT concurrent with erlotinib in patients with multiple brain metastases of lung adenocarcinoma. WBRT was administered at 30Gy/10f in both arms. In the combination arm, 150 mg erlotinib was given each day, starting the first day of radiotherapy and continuing for 1 month following the end of radiotherapy. Thereafter, pemetrexed or docetaxel monotherapy or the best supportive therapy was given to both arms. The intracranial objective response rate and the local progression-free survival (LPFS) were primary endpoints. Toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints. Thirty-one patients in the WBRT group and 23 patients in the combination group were enrolled from November 2009 to December 2011. In the WBRT and the combination arms, respectively, the objective response rate was 54.84% and 95.65% (P = 0.001), the median local progression-free survival was 6.8 months and 10.6 months (P = 0.003), the median PFS was 5.2 months and 6.8 months (P = 0.009), and median OS was 8.9 months and 10.7 months (P = 0.020). In the combination group, there were no differences of LPFS, PFS, and OS between the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation patients and EGFR wild-type patients. No Grade 4 or higher side effects were observed in either group. A multivariate analysis indicated that erlotinib was the most important prognostic factor for a prolonged survival. Data showed that erlotinib in combination with WBRT had a tolerable toxicity profile and prolonged the LPFS, PFS, and OS of lung adenocarcinoma patients with multiple brain metastases compared with WBRT monotherapy.

Keywords: WBRT; erlotinib; radiosensitizer; tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The LPFS, PFS, and OS of WBRT group versus WBRT+erlotinib group. Notes: The median LPFS, PFS, and OS were 6.8 months (range, 0–18.7 months), 5.2 months (range, 0–14.7 months), and 8.9 months (range, 4.5–19.7 months), respectively, in the WBRT group and 10.6 months (range, 4.9–20.7 months), 6.8 months (range, 1.5–20.7 months), and 10.7 months (range, 5.3–29.7 months), respectively, in the combination group. There were statistically significant differences in the LPFS, PFS, and OS between the groups. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; LPFS, local progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; WBRT, whole brain radiotherapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The LPFS, PFS, and OS of EGFR mutation patients versus EGFR wild-type patients in the combination arm. Notes: In the combination group, 12 patients had no exons mutations; 11 patients had 19/21 exons mutations, and no patients had k-ras mutations. The median LPFS, PFS, and OS were 9.6 months (range, 6.9–16.4 months), 7.5 months (range, 6.2–16.1 months), and 10.2 months (range, 7.1–16.5 months), respectively, in the EGFR wild-type group and 11.2 months (range, 4.9–20.7 months), 6.1 months (range, 3.2–20.7 months), and 11.5 months (range, 5.3–29.7 months), respectively, in the EGFR mutation group. There were no statistically significant differences in the LPFS, PFS, and OS between the two groups. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; LPFS, local progression-free survival; MT-EGFR, mutation-type EGFR patients; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; WT-EGFR, wild-type EGFR patients; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.

References

    1. Tsao MN, Lloyd N, Wong R, Chow E, Rakovitch E, Laperriere N. Whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of multiple brain metastases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;19(3):CD003869.
    1. Kawabe T, Phi JH, Yamamoto M, Kim DG, Barfod BE, Urakawa Y. Treatment of brain metastasis from lung cancer. Prog Neurol Surg. 2012;25:148–155.
    1. Kim JE, Lee DH, Choi Y, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors as a first-line therapy for never-smokers with adenocarcinoma of the lung having asymptomatic synchronous brain metastasis. Lung Cancer. 2009;65(3):351–354.
    1. Gounant V, Wislez M, Poulot V, et al. Subsequent brain metastasis responses to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2007;58(3):425–428.
    1. Olmez I, Donahue BR, Butler JS, Huang Y, Rubin P, Xu Y. Clinical outcomes in extracranial tumor sites and unusual toxicities with concurrent whole brain radiation (WBRT) and Erlotinib treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastasis. Lung Cancer. 2010;70(2):174–179.
    1. Lind JS, Lagerwaard FJ, Smit EF, Senan S. Phase I study of concurrent whole brain radiotherapy and erlotinib for multiple brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(5):1391–1396.
    1. Yi HG, Kim HJ, Kim YJ, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective for leptomeningeal metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer patients with sensitive EGFR mutation or other predictive factors of good response for EGFR TKI. Lung Cancer. 2009;65(1):80–84.
    1. Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, et al. CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003;13(3):176–181.
    1. Palazzi M, Tomatis S, Orlandi E, et al. Effects of treatment intensification on acute local toxicity during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: prospective observational study validating CTCAE, version 3.0, scoring system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(2):330–337.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–247.
    1. Sun JM, Ahn MJ, Park MJ, et al. Accuracy of RECIST 1.1 for non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Lung Cancer. 2010;69(1):105–109.
    1. Robinet G, Thomas P, Breton JL, et al. Results of a phase III study of early versus delayed whole brain radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin and vinorelbine combination in inoperable brain metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer: Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie (GFPC) Protocol 95-1. Ann Oncol. 2001;12(1):59–67.
    1. Cortot AB, Gerinière L, Robinet G, et al. Groupe Lyon-Saint-Etienne d’Oncologie Thoracique. Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie Phase II trial of temozolomide and cisplatin followed by whole brain radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a GLOT-GFPC study. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(9):1412–1417.
    1. Guerrieri M, Wong K, Ryan G, Millward M, Quong G, Ball DL. A randomised phase III study of palliative radiation with concomitant carboplatin for brain metastases from non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer. 2004;46(1):107–111.
    1. Togashi Y, Masago K, Fukudo M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid concentration of erlotinib and its active metabolite OSI-420 in patients with central nervous system metastases of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(7):950–955.
    1. Broniscer A, Panetta JC, O’Shaughnessy M, et al. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of erlotinib and its active metabolite OSI-420. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(5):1511–1515.
    1. O’Connor MM, Mayberg MR. Effects of radiation on cerebral vasculature: a review. J Neurosurgery. 2000;46(1):138–149.
    1. Hutchinson F. Molecular biology of mutagenesis of mammalian cells by ionizing radiation. Semin Cancer Biol. 1993;4(2):85–92.
    1. Harms-Ringdahl M, Nicotera P, Radford IR. Radiation induced apoptosis. Mutat Res. 1996;366(2):171–179.
    1. Chinnaiyan P, Huang S, Vallabhaneni G, et al. Mechanisms of enhanced radiation response following epidermal growth factor receptor signaling inhibition by erlotinib (Tarceva) Cancer Res. 2005;65(8):3328–3335.
    1. Halatsch ME, Löw S, Mursch K, et al. Candidate genes for sensitivity and resistance of human glioblastoma multiforme cell lines to erlotinib. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(2):211–218.
    1. Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, Cicenas S, et al. Efficacy and safety of erlotinib versus chemotherapy in second-line treatment of patients with advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer with poor prognosis (TITAN): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(3):300–308.
    1. Welsh JW, Komaki R, Amini A, et al. Phase II trial of erlotinib plus concurrent whole-brain radiation therapy for patients with brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(7):895–902.
    1. Porta R, Sánchez-Torres JM, Paz-Ares L, et al. Brain metastases from lung cancer responding to erlotinib: the importance of EGFR mutation. Eur Respir J. 2011;37(3):624–631.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren