Exploring Natural Clusters of Chronic Migraine Phenotypes: A Cross-Sectional Clinical Study
Yohannes W Woldeamanuel, Bharati M Sanjanwala, Addie M Peretz, Robert P Cowan, Yohannes W Woldeamanuel, Bharati M Sanjanwala, Addie M Peretz, Robert P Cowan
Abstract
Heterogeneity in chronic migraine (CM) presents significant challenge for diagnosis, management, and clinical trials. To explore naturally occurring clusters of CM, we utilized data reduction methods on migraine-related clinical dataset. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering and principal component analyses (PCA) were conducted to identify natural clusters in 100 CM patients using 14 migraine-related clinical variables. Three major clusters were identified. Cluster I (29 patients) - the severely impacted patient featured highest levels of depression and migraine-related disability. Cluster II (28 patients) - the minimally impacted patient exhibited highest levels of self-efficacy and exercise. Cluster III (43 patients) - the moderately impacted patient showed features ranging between Cluster I and II. The first 5 principal components (PC) of the PCA explained 65% of variability. The first PC (eigenvalue 4.2) showed one major pattern of clinical features positively loaded by migraine-related disability, depression, poor sleep quality, somatic symptoms, post-traumatic stress disorder, being overweight and negatively loaded by pain self-efficacy and exercise levels. CM patients can be classified into three naturally-occurring clusters. Patients with high self-efficacy and exercise levels had lower migraine-related disability, depression, sleep quality, and somatic symptoms. These results may ultimately inform different management strategies.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
- Natoli J, et al. Global prevalence of chronic migraine: A systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:599–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01941.x.
- Adams AM, et al. The impact of chronic migraine: The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study methods and baseline results. Cephalalgia. 2015;35:563–78. doi: 10.1177/0333102414552532.
- Yalın OÖ, et al. Phenotypic features of chronic migraine. J. Headache Pain. 2016;17:26. doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0616-y.
- Lipton RB, et al. Identifying natural subgroups of migraine based on comorbidity and concomitant condition profiles: results of the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study. Headache. 2018;58:933–947. doi: 10.1111/head.13342.
- Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1–211.
- Giesecke T, et al. Subgrouping of fibromyalgia patients on the basis of pressure-pain thresholds and psychological factors. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:2916–22. doi: 10.1002/art.11272.
- Bruehl S, Lofland KR, Semenchuk EM, Rokicki LA, Penzien DB. Use of cluster analysis to validate IHS diagnostic criteria for migraine and tension-type headache. Headache. 1999;39:181–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1999.3903181.x.
- Schürks M, Buring JE, Kurth T. Migraine features, associated symptoms and triggers: a principal component analysis in the Women’s Health Study. Cephalalgia. 2011;31:861–9. doi: 10.1177/0333102411401635.
- Diehr P, et al. Cluster analysis to determine headache types. J. Chronic Dis. 1982;35:623–33. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(82)90014-5.
- Wang S-J, Wang P-J, Fuh J-L, Peng K-P, Ng K. Comparisons of disability, quality of life, and resource use between chronic and episodic migraineurs: a clinic-based study in Taiwan. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:171–81. doi: 10.1177/0333102412468668.
- Manack AN, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Chronic migraine: epidemiology and disease burden. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2011;15:70–8. doi: 10.1007/s11916-010-0157-z.
- Irby MB, et al. Aerobic exercise for reducing migraine burden: mechanisms, markers, and models of change processes. Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2016;56:357–369. doi: 10.1111/head.12738.
- Baillie LE, Gabriele JM, Penzien DB. A systematic review of behavioral headache interventions with an aerobic exercise component. Headache. 2014;54:40–53. doi: 10.1111/head.12204.
- Krøll LS, Hammarlund CS, Linde M, Gard G, Jensen RH. The effects of aerobic exercise for persons with migraine and co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain. A randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1805–1816. doi: 10.1177/0333102417752119.
- Calhoun AH, Ford S. Behavioral sleep modification may revert transformed migraine to episodic migraine. Headache. 2007;47:1178–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00780.x.
- Spigt M, Weerkamp N, Troost J, van Schayck CP, Knottnerus JA. A randomized trial on the effects of regular water intake in patients with recurrent headaches. Fam. Pract. 2012;29:370–5. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr112.
- Hufnagl KN, Peroutka SJ. Glucose regulation in headache: implications for dietary management. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2002;2:311–7. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2.3.311.
- Seng EK, Holroyd KA. Dynamics of changes in self-efficacy and locus of control expectancies in the behavioral and drug treatment of severe migraine. Ann. Behav. Med. 2010;40:235–247. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9223-3.
- Hoffman MD, Hoffman DR. Does aerobic exercise improve pain perception and mood? A review of the evidence related to healthy and chronic pain subjects. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2007;11:93–97. doi: 10.1007/s11916-007-0004-z.
- Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Adv. Behav. Res. Ther. 1978;1:139–161. doi: 10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4.
- McAuley E, Blissmer B. Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2000;28:85–8.
- Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629–808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658.
- Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, Sawyer J. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001;56:S20–8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.56.suppl_1.S20.
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001;16:606–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
- Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006;166:1092–7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
- Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol. Assess. 1995;7:524–532. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524.
- Buysse DJ, et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28:193–213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
- Prins A, et al. The primary care PTSD screen (PC–PTSD): development and operating characteristics. Prim. Care Psychiatry. 2004;9:9–14. doi: 10.1185/135525703125002360.
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-15: Validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom. Med. 2002;64:258–266. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200203000-00008.
- Nicholas MK. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur. J. Pain. 2007;11:153–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.008.
- Woldeamanuel YW, Cowan RP. The impact of regular lifestyle behavior in migraine: a prevalence case-referent study. J. Neurol. 2016;263:669–76. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8031-5.
- Ketchen D, Jr., Shook CL. The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: an analysis and critique. Strateg. Manag. J. 2002;17:441–458. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199606)17:6<441::AID-SMJ819>;2-G.
- Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1960;20:141–151. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000116.
- Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav. Res. 1966;1:245–76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
Source: PubMed