What do peer support workers do? A job description

Nora Jacobson, Lucy Trojanowski, Carolyn S Dewa, Nora Jacobson, Lucy Trojanowski, Carolyn S Dewa

Abstract

Background: The extant literature suggests that poorly defined job roles make it difficult for peer support workers to be successful, and hinder their integration into multi-disciplinary workplace teams. This article uses data gathered as part of a participatory evaluation of a peer support program at a psychiatric tertiary care facility to specify the work that peers do.

Methods: Data were gathered through interviews, focus groups, and activity logs and were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach.

Results: Peers engage in direct work with clients and in indirect work that supports their work with clients. The main types of direct work are advocacy, connecting to resources, experiential sharing, building community, relationship building, group facilitation, skill building/mentoring/goal setting, and socialization/self-esteem building. The main types of indirect work are group planning and development, administration, team communication, supervision/training, receiving support, education/awareness building, and information gathering and verification. In addition, peers also do work aimed at building relationships with staff and work aimed at legitimizing the peer role. Experience, approach, presence, role modeling, collaboration, challenge, and compromise can be seen as the tangible enactments of peers' philosophy of work.

Conclusions: Candidates for positions as peer support workers require more than experience with mental health and/or addiction problems. The job description provided in this article may not be appropriate for all settings, but it will contribute to a better understanding of the peer support worker position, the skills required, and the types of expectations that could define successful fulfillment of the role.

References

    1. Jacobson N. In recovery: The making of mental health policy. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press; 2004.
    1. Clement JA. Managed care and recovery: opportunities and challenges for psychiatric nursing. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1997;11(5):231–237. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9417(97)80013-1.
    1. Davidson L, Chinman M, Sells D, Rowe M. Peer support among adults with serious mental illness: A report from the field. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32:443–450.
    1. Dixon L, Krauss N, Lehman A. Consumers as service providers: the promise and challenge. Community Ment Health J. 1994;30(6)):615–625. discussion 627–634.
    1. Lawn S, Smith A, Hunter K. Mental health peer support for hospital avoidance and early discharge: An Australian example of consumer driven and operated service. J Ment Health. 2008;17:498–508. doi: 10.1080/09638230701530242.
    1. Mowbray CT, Rusilowski-Clover G, Arnold J, Allen C, Harris S, McCrohan N, Greenfield A. Project WINS: integrating vocational services on mental health case management teams. Community Ment Health J. 1994;30(4):347–362. doi: 10.1007/BF02207488.
    1. Swarbrick M, Brice GH. Sharing the message of hope, wellness, and recovery with consumers psychiatric hospitals. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2006;9:101–109. doi: 10.1080/15487760600876196.
    1. Chamberlin J, Rogers ES, Ellison ML. Self-help programs: A description of their characteristics and their members. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1996;19:33–42.
    1. Mead S, Hilton D, Curtis L. Peer support: a theoretical perspective. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001;25(2):134–141.
    1. Mowbray CT, Moxley DP, Thrasher S, Bybee D, McCrohan N, Harris S, Clover G. Consumers as community support providers: issues created by role innovation. Community Ment Health J. 1996;32(1):47–67. doi: 10.1007/BF02249367.
    1. Van Tosh L, del Vecchio P. Consumer-operated self-help programs: A technical report. Rockville, MD: U.S. Center for Mental Health Services; 2001.
    1. Burti L, Amaddeo F, Ambrosi M, Bonetto C, Cristofalo D, Ruggeri M, Tansella M. Does additional care provided by a consumer self-help group improve psychiatric outcome? A study in an Italian community-based psychiatric service. Community Ment Health J. 2005;41(6):705–720. doi: 10.1007/s10597-005-6428-1.
    1. Castelein S, Bruggeman R, van Busschbach JT, van der Gaag M, Stant AD, Knegtering H, Wiersma D. The effectiveness of peer support groups in psychosis: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008;118(1):64–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01216.x.
    1. Corrigan PW. Impact of consumer-operated services on empowerment and recovery of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(10):1493–1496. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.10.1493.
    1. Min SY, Whitecraft J, Rothbard AB, Salzer MS. Peer support for persons with co-occurring disorders and community tenure: a survival analysis. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2007;30(3):207–213.
    1. Nelson G, Ochocka J, Janzen R, Trainor J, Goering P, Lomorey J. A longitudinal study of mental health consumer/survivor initiatives: Part V—outcomes at 3-year follow-up. J Community Psychol. 2007;35:655–665. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20171.
    1. Resnick SG, Rosenheck RA. Integrating peer-provided services: a quasi-experimental study of recovery orientation, confidence, and empowerment. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59(11):1307–1314. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.59.11.1307.
    1. Doughty C, Tse S. The effectiveness of service user-run or service user-led mental health services for people with mental illness: A systematic literature review. Wellington, NZ: Mental Health Commission; 2005.
    1. Rogers ES, Kash M, Brucker D. Systematic review of peer delivered services literature 1989–2009. .
    1. Campbell J. Federal multi-site study finds consumer-operated service programs are evidence-based practices. .
    1. Clay S. In: On our own, together. Clay S, editor. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press; 2005. About us: What we have in common; pp. 3–16.
    1. Rogers ES, Teague GB, Lichenstein C, Campbell J, Lyass A, Chen R, Banks S. Effects of participation in consumer-operated service programs on both personal and organizationally mediated empowerment: results of multisite study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(6):785–799. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2006.10.0125.
    1. Mowbray CT, Moxley DP, Collins ME. Consumers as mental health providers: first-person accounts of benefits and limitations. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998;25(4):397–411. doi: 10.1007/BF02287510.
    1. Salzer MS, Shear SL. Identifying consumer-provider benefits in evaluations of consumer-delivered services. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2002;25(3):281–288.
    1. Coatsworth-Puspoky R, Forchuk C, Ward-Griffin C. Peer support relationships: an unexplored interpersonal process in mental health. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006;13(5):490–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00970.x.
    1. Bassman R. Whose reality is it anyway? Consumer/survivors/ex-patients can speak for themselves. J Humanist Psychol. 2001;41:11–35. doi: 10.1177/0022167801414002.
    1. Campbell J. In: On our own, together. Clay S, editor. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press; 2005. The historical and philosophical development of peer-run support programs; pp. 17–64.
    1. Schwenk EB, Brusilovskiy E, Salzer MS. Results from a national survey of certified peer specialist job titles and job descriptions: Evidence of a versatile behavioral health workforce. Philadelphia, PA: The University of Pennsylvania Collaborative on Community Integration; 2009.
    1. Corrigan PW, Slopen N, Gracia G, Phelan S, Keogh CB, Keck L. Some recovery processes in mutual-help groups for persons with mental illness; II: qualitative analysis of participant interviews. Community Ment Health J. 2005;41(6):721–735. doi: 10.1007/s10597-005-6429-0.
    1. MacNeil C, Mead S. A narrative approach to developing standards for trauma-informed peer support. Am J Eval. 2005;26:231–244. doi: 10.1177/1098214005275633.
    1. Solomon P. Peer support/peer provided services underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004;27(4):392–401.
    1. Silverstein SM, Bellack AS. A scientific agenda for the concept of recovery as it applies to schizophrenia. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28(7):1108–1124. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.03.004.
    1. Gates LB, Akabas SH. Developing strategies to integrate peer providers into the staff of mental health agencies. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007;34(3):293–306. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0109-4.
    1. Moll S, Holmes J, Geronimo J, Sherman D. Work transitions for peer support providers in traditional mental health programs: unique challenges and opportunities. Work. 2009;33(4):449–458.
    1. Manning SS, Suire B. Consumers as employees in mental health: bridges and roadblocks. Psychiatr Serv. 1996;47(9):939–940. 943.
    1. Catano VM, Wiesner WH, Hackett RD, Methot LL. Recruitment and Selection in Canada. 4. Toronto, ON: Nelson; 2010.
    1. Department of Health and Human Services, State of Maine. Intentional Peer support: what makes it unique? .
    1. Leff HS, Campbell J, Gagne C, Woocher LS. In: Consumers as providers in psychiatric rehabilitation. Mowbray CT, Moxley DP, Jasper CA, Howell LL, editor. Columbia, MD: International Association of Psychosocial Rehabilitation Services; 1997. Evaluating peer providers; pp. 488–501.
    1. Strauss A. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren