Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Oliver Sartor, Johann de Bono, Kim N Chi, Karim Fizazi, Ken Herrmann, Kambiz Rahbar, Scott T Tagawa, Luke T Nordquist, Nitin Vaishampayan, Ghassan El-Haddad, Chandler H Park, Tomasz M Beer, Alison Armour, Wendy J Pérez-Contreras, Michelle DeSilvio, Euloge Kpamegan, Germo Gericke, Richard A Messmann, Michael J Morris, Bernd J Krause, VISION Investigators, Carlos Artigas Guix, Benoit Beuselinck, Renaud Lhommel, Jean-Mathieu Beauregard, Kim Chi, Urban Emmenegger, Cristiano Ferrario, David Laidley, Michael Ong, Fred Saad, Simon Buus, Mette Moe Kempel, Peter Petersen, Anne Cazeau, Frederic Courbon, Karim Fizazi, Aude Flechon, Mathieu Gauthe, Hakim Mahammedi, Matthias Eiber, Ken Herrmann, Bernd Joachim Krause, Kambiz Rahbar, Bart de Keizer, Marcel Janssen, Jules Lavalaye, James Nagarajah, Wouter Vogel, Irma Molina-Vicenty, Enrique Castellanos, Silvia Johansson, Jon Kindblom, Anna Sundlov, Anders Widmark, Amit Bahl, Simon Crabb, Johann de Bono, Deborah Enting, Robert Jones, Heather Payne, Carla Perna, Nabil Adra, Andrew Armstrong, Hani Babiker, Charles Bane, Tomasz Beer, Gholam Reza Berenji, Glenn Bubley, Brian Chang, Bennett Chin, Johannes Czernin, Ebrahim Delpassand, Robert Den, Robert Dreicer, Ghassan El-Haddad, David Elliott, Bruno Fang, Irfan Farukhi, Gregg Franklin, Rohan Garje, Michael Gordon, Arif Hussain, Ayse Kendi, Vadim Koshkin, Frank Liu, Jeff Michalski, Alicia Morgans, Michael Morris, Luke Nordquist, Medhat Osman, Chandler Park, Daniel Petrylak, Morand Piert, Daniella Pinho, Oliver Sartor, Satish Shah, Neal Shore, Sandhya Srinivas, Scott Tagawa, Ronald Tutrone Jr, Nitin Vaishampayan, Nicholas Vogelzang, Xiao Wei, Song Zhao, Oliver Sartor, Johann de Bono, Kim N Chi, Karim Fizazi, Ken Herrmann, Kambiz Rahbar, Scott T Tagawa, Luke T Nordquist, Nitin Vaishampayan, Ghassan El-Haddad, Chandler H Park, Tomasz M Beer, Alison Armour, Wendy J Pérez-Contreras, Michelle DeSilvio, Euloge Kpamegan, Germo Gericke, Richard A Messmann, Michael J Morris, Bernd J Krause, VISION Investigators, Carlos Artigas Guix, Benoit Beuselinck, Renaud Lhommel, Jean-Mathieu Beauregard, Kim Chi, Urban Emmenegger, Cristiano Ferrario, David Laidley, Michael Ong, Fred Saad, Simon Buus, Mette Moe Kempel, Peter Petersen, Anne Cazeau, Frederic Courbon, Karim Fizazi, Aude Flechon, Mathieu Gauthe, Hakim Mahammedi, Matthias Eiber, Ken Herrmann, Bernd Joachim Krause, Kambiz Rahbar, Bart de Keizer, Marcel Janssen, Jules Lavalaye, James Nagarajah, Wouter Vogel, Irma Molina-Vicenty, Enrique Castellanos, Silvia Johansson, Jon Kindblom, Anna Sundlov, Anders Widmark, Amit Bahl, Simon Crabb, Johann de Bono, Deborah Enting, Robert Jones, Heather Payne, Carla Perna, Nabil Adra, Andrew Armstrong, Hani Babiker, Charles Bane, Tomasz Beer, Gholam Reza Berenji, Glenn Bubley, Brian Chang, Bennett Chin, Johannes Czernin, Ebrahim Delpassand, Robert Den, Robert Dreicer, Ghassan El-Haddad, David Elliott, Bruno Fang, Irfan Farukhi, Gregg Franklin, Rohan Garje, Michael Gordon, Arif Hussain, Ayse Kendi, Vadim Koshkin, Frank Liu, Jeff Michalski, Alicia Morgans, Michael Morris, Luke Nordquist, Medhat Osman, Chandler Park, Daniel Petrylak, Morand Piert, Daniella Pinho, Oliver Sartor, Satish Shah, Neal Shore, Sandhya Srinivas, Scott Tagawa, Ronald Tutrone Jr, Nitin Vaishampayan, Nicholas Vogelzang, Xiao Wei, Song Zhao

Abstract

Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer remains fatal despite recent advances. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-PSMA-617 is a radioligand therapy that delivers beta-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and the surrounding microenvironment.

Methods: We conducted an international, open-label, phase 3 trial evaluating 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients who had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with at least one androgen-receptor-pathway inhibitor and one or two taxane regimens and who had PSMA-positive gallium-68 (68Ga)-labeled PSMA-11 positron-emission tomographic-computed tomographic scans. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either 177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks for four to six cycles) plus protocol-permitted standard care or standard care alone. Protocol-permitted standard care excluded chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radium-223 (223Ra), and investigational drugs. The alternate primary end points were imaging-based progression-free survival and overall survival, which were powered for hazard ratios of 0.67 and 0.73, respectively. Key secondary end points were objective response, disease control, and time to symptomatic skeletal events. Adverse events during treatment were those occurring no more than 30 days after the last dose and before subsequent anticancer treatment.

Results: From June 2018 to mid-October 2019, a total of 831 of 1179 screened patients underwent randomization. The baseline characteristics of the patients were balanced between the groups. The median follow-up was 20.9 months. 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard care significantly prolonged, as compared with standard care, both imaging-based progression-free survival (median, 8.7 vs. 3.4 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.40; 99.2% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.57; P<0.001) and overall survival (median, 15.3 vs. 11.3 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.74; P<0.001). All the key secondary end points significantly favored 177Lu-PSMA-617. The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or above was higher with 177Lu-PSMA-617 than without (52.7% vs. 38.0%), but quality of life was not adversely affected.

Conclusions: Radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-617 prolonged imaging-based progression-free survival and overall survival when added to standard care in patients with advanced PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. (Funded by Endocyte, a Novartis company; VISION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03511664.).

Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Figures

Figure 1. Screening, Randomization, and Follow-up of…
Figure 1. Screening, Randomization, and Follow-up of the Patients.
The numbers in parentheses indicate the numbers of patients who underwent randomization on or after March 5, 2019, which was the date on which trial‑site education measures were implemented to reduce the incidence of withdrawal from the trial in the control group (see the Supplementary Methods section). In the 177Lu‑PSMA‑617 group, the reasons for withdrawal of consent to receive 177Lu‑PSMA‑617 were the following: noted as “no reason given” on the case‑report form (in 1 patient), unknown (in 1), and treatment “fatigue” due to travel or protocol procedures (in 1). In the same group, the reasons for withdrawal of consent to receive standard care were the following: noted as “no reason given” on the case‑report form (in 1) and treatment “fatigue” due to travel or protocol procedures (in 1). In the control group, the reasons that patients withdrew consent to treatment were the following: an assessment that the patient was receiving best care without 177Lu‑PSMA‑617 (in 31), noted as “no reason given” on the case‑report form (in 7), a decision to pursue treatment outside the trial (in 5), treatment “fatigue” due to travel or protocol procedures (in 2), and a perceived lack of benefit (in 1). CT denotes computed tomography, PET positron‑emission tomography, and PSMA prostate‑specific membrane antigen.
Figure 2. Imaging-based Progression-free Survival and Overall…
Figure 2. Imaging-based Progression-free Survival and Overall Survival (Primary Efficacy Outcomes) and Time to the First Symptomatic Skeletal Event (Key Secondary Outcome).
Panel A shows imaging‑based progression‑free survival among the 581 patients who had been randomly assigned to receive either 177Lu‑PSMA‑617 plus standard care or standard care alone after the implementation of enhanced trial‑site education measures. Imaging‑based progression‑free survival, defined as the time to imaging‑documented disease progression according to criteria of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 or death, was independently centrally reviewed. Panel B shows overall survival among all 831 patients who had undergone randomization. Panel C shows the time to first symptomatic skeletal event or death in the same population as was used in the analysis of imaging‑based progression‑free survival. Plus signs and circles indicate censored data in the 177Lu‑PSMA‑617 group and control group, respectively; information on data censoring is provided in Table S5.

References

    1. Sartor O, de Bono JS. Metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;378:645–57.
    1. Nuhn P, De Bono JS, Fizazi K, et al.Update on systemic prostate cancer therapies: management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the era of precision oncology. Eur Urol 2019;75:88–99.
    1. de Bono J, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al.Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:2091–102.
    1. Hussain M, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al.Survival with olaparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;383:2345–57.
    1. Antonarakis ES, Piulats JM, Gross-Goupil M, et al.Pembrolizumab for treatment-refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: multicohort, open-label phase II KEYNOTE-199 study. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:395–405.
    1. Abida W, Patnaik A, Campbell D, et al.Rucaparib in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harboring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene alteration. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:3763–72.
    1. Rowe SP, Gorin MA, Pomper MG. Imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen with small-molecule PET radiotracers: from the bench to advanced clinical applications. Annu Rev Med 2019;70:461–77.
    1. Israeli RS, Powell CT, Fair WR, Heston WD. Molecular cloning of a complementary DNA encoding a prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res 1993; 53:227–30.
    1. Horoszewicz JS, Kawinski E, Murphy GP. Monoclonal antibodies to a new antigenic marker in epithelial prostatic cells and serum of prostatic cancer patients. Anticancer Res 1987;7:927–35.
    1. Hupe MC, Philippi C, Roth D, et al.Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) on biopsies is an independent risk stratifier of prostate cancer patients at time of initial diagnosis. Front Oncol 2018;8:623.
    1. Bostwick DG, Pacelli A, Blute M, Roche P, Murphy GP. Prostate specific membrane antigen expression in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma: a study of 184 cases. Cancer 1998;82:2256–61.
    1. Minner S, Wittmer C, Graefen M, et al.High level PSMA expression is associated with early PSA recurrence in surgically treated prostate cancer. Prostate 2011;71:281–8.
    1. Sweat SD, Pacelli A, Murphy GP, Bostwick DG. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression is greatest in prostate adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. Urology 1998;52:637–40.
    1. Paschalis A, Sheehan B, Riisnaes R, et al.Prostate-specific membrane antigen heterogeneity and DNA repair defects in prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2019;76:469–78.
    1. Vlachostergios PJ, Niaz MJ, Sun M, et al.Prostate-specific membrane antigen uptake and survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2021;11:630589.
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, Hetzheim H, Kratochwil C, et al.The theranostic PSMA ligand PSMA-617 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer by PET/CT: biodistribution in humans, radiation dosimetry, and first evaluation of tumor lesions. J Nucl Med 2015;56:1697–705.
    1. Violet J, Jackson P, Ferdinandus J, et al.Dosimetry of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in meta-static castration-resistant prostate cancer: correlations between pretherapeutic imaging and whole-body tumor dosimetry with treatment outcomes. J Nucl Med 2019;60:517–23.
    1. Banerjee S, Pillai MRA, Knapp FFR. Lutetium-177 therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals: linking chemistry, radiochemistry, and practical applications. Chem Rev 2015;115:2934–74.
    1. Rahbar K, Ahmadzadehfar H, Kratochwil C, et al.German multicenter study investigating 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in advanced prostate cancer patients. J Nucl Med 2017;58:85–90.
    1. Yadav MP, Ballal S, Sahoo RK, Dwivedi SN, Bal C. Radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019;213:275–85.
    1. Kim YJ, Kim Y-I. Therapeutic responses and survival effects of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med 2018;43:728–34.
    1. von Eyben FE, Roviello G, Kiljunen T, et al.Third-line treatment and 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:496–508.
    1. Hofman MS, Violet J, Hicks RJ, et al.[177Lu]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:825–33.
    1. Violet J, Sandhu S, Iravani A, et al.Long-term follow-up and outcomes of retreatment in an expanded 50-patient single-center phase II prospective trial of 177Lu-PSMA-617 theranostics in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 2020;61:857–65.
    1. Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, et al.[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2021;397:797–804.
    1. Rahbar K, Bodei L, Morris MJ. Is the vision of radioligand therapy for prostate cancer becoming a reality? An overview of the phase III VISION trial and its importance for the future of theranostics. J Nucl Med 2019;60:1504–6.
    1. Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, et al.68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;44:1014–24.
    1. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al.Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982;5:649–55.
    1. Scher HI, Morris MJ, Stadler WM, et al.Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: updated recommendations from the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:1402–18.
    1. Parker C, Nilsson S, Heinrich D, et al.Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2013;369:213–23.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al.New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228–47.
    1. Hochberg Y, Tamhane A. Multiple comparison procedures New York: John Wiley, 1987.
    1. Lu K, Li D, Koch GG. Comparison between two controlled multiple imputation methods for sensitivity analyses of time-to-event data with possibly informative censoring. Stat Biopharm Res 2015;7:199–213.
    1. Atkinson A, Kenward MG, Clayton T, Carpenter JR. Reference-based sensitivity analysis for time-to-event data. Pharm Stat 2019;18:645–58.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren