Global Provisioning of Red Meat for Flexitarian Diets

Talia M Hicks, Scott O Knowles, Mustafa M Farouk, Talia M Hicks, Scott O Knowles, Mustafa M Farouk

Abstract

Although not always labeled as such, flexitarianism is the default lifestyle for much of the world, whereby meals based on plant materials provide the bulk of people's calories. The rich nutrition of meat and animal products is often the lynchpin of these diets, even when only consumed occasionally. It provides forms and concentrations of essential proteins, lipids, and micronutrients that are otherwise scarce. However, the production of this meat is resource intensive. It requires large quantities of arable land and water, and typically has lower conversion efficiency of farm inputs to edible outputs compared with crops, poultry, aquaculture, dairy, and eggs. An additional complication is that the quantity of ancillary products produced during slaughterhouse operations is large and underutilized. Each year, approximately 190 million metric tons (MMT) of red meat, including pork, lamb, sheep, veal, beef, and goats are produced globally, half of which will be consumed by less than 25% of the population living in developed countries. With demand for meat expected to exceed 376 MMT by 2030, an increase in the adoption of plant-based diets presents an opportunity for the world to re-evaluate how meat can be sustainably produced, with greater emphasis on animal welfare, nutritional value, product safety, better utilization, and distribution channels. In this article we consider the role meat plays in the modern diet, its production and consumption, opportunities to improve utilization of the animal, the benefits of incorporating a diverse range of red meat into diets, and the strategies that the meat industry should consider in response to flexitarianism.

Keywords: flexitarian; food security; nutrition; offal; production; red meat; waste.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Global production statistics for various meats and offal in million metric tons (MMT), from 1990 to 2013 (18). Total meat does not include seafood or shellfish.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of meat lost and wasted from various stages of the food supply chain for different regions (62).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Typical content of key nutrients in lean muscle meat, heart and liver, shown here as the averaged values of lamb, beef, and pork sources (78) and expressed as a proportion of the adult male RDA (66) that would be provided by a 100 g raw serving. Items within nutrient classes are ordered by their increasing dietary requirement: amino acids 5–42 mg/kg bodyweight/day, minerals 55 μg−1,200 mg/day, vitamins 2.4 μg−14 mg/day. Calculations were based on the materials' raw native state, therefore water content is higher and nutrient concentrations are concomitantly lower than would be expected in the cooked versions of these foods.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Typical content of key nutrients in grains, legumes and tree nuts, shown here as the averaged values of 7–8 sources (78) and expressed as a proportion of the adult male RDA (66) that would be provided by a 100 g raw serving. Items within nutrient classes are ordered by their increasing dietary requirement: amino acids 5–42 mg/kg bodyweight/day, minerals 55 μg−1,200 mg/day, vitamins 2.4 μg−14 mg/day. Calculations were based on the materials' raw native state, therefore water content is much lower and nutrient concentrations are concomitantly higher than would be expected in the cooked versions of these foods.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Organ meats on display in a retail cabinet in a market in Izmir Turkey. Almost all parts of the carcass are being utilized for human consumption. Small quantities of these nutrient-dense organ meats can significantly contribute to a flexitarian diet.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forms of organ meat cooking and utilization. (Left) Shows sheep intestines being roasted for slicing and incorporating into fast-food meals in Izmir Turkey. (Right) Shows lamb meat and testicles barbecued side by side, demonstrating a possible combination of muscle and organ meats in a meal.

References

    1. Gupta S. Brain food: Clever eating. Nature (2016) 531:S12. 10.1038/531S12a
    1. Aiello LC, Wheeler P. The expensive-tissue hypothesis: the brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. Curr Anthropol. (1995) 36:199–21. 10.1086/204350
    1. Foley R. The evolutionary consequences of increased carnivory in hominids. In: Stanford CB, Bunn HT. editors. Meat-Eating and Human Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; (2001). p. 305–31.
    1. Leonard WR, Snodgrass JJ, Robertson ML. Effects of brain evolution on human nutrition and metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. (2007) 27:311–27. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093659
    1. Antón SC, Leonard WR, Robertson ML. An ecomorphological model of the initial hominid dispersal from Africa. J Hum Evol. (2002) 43:773–85. 10.1006/jhev.2002.0602
    1. Milton K. The critical role played by animal source foods in human (homo) evolution. J Nutr. (2003) 133:3886S−92S. 10.1093/jn/133.11.3886S
    1. Leitzmann C. Vegetarian nutrition: past, present, future. Am J Clin Nutr. (2014) 100(Suppl 1):496s−502s. 10.3945/ajcn.113.071365
    1. Pereira PMdCC, Vicente AFdRB. Meat nutritional composition and nutritive role in the human diet. Meat Sci. (2013) 93:586–92. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.09.018
    1. Speth JD. Early hominid hunting and scavenging: the role of meat as an energy source. J Hum Evol. (1989) 18:329–43. 10.1016/0047-2484(89)90035-3
    1. Mann N. Meat in the human diet: an anthropological perspective. Nutr Diet. (2007) 64:S102–107. 10.1111/j.1747-0080.2007.00194.x
    1. Solomons NW. Plant-based diets are traditional in developing countries: 21st century challenges for better nutrition and health. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. (2000) 9(Suppl 1):S41–54. 10.1046/j.1440-6047.2000.00165.x
    1. Harris DR, Fuller DQ. Agriculture: definition and overview. In: Smith C. editor. Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. New York, NY: Springer New York; (2014). p. 104–13.
    1. Hueston W, McLeod A. Overview of the global food system: changes over time/space and lessons for the future of food safety. In: Choffnes ER, Relman DA, Olsen L, Hutton R, Mack A. editors. Improving Food Safety Through a One Health Approach: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press; (2012). p. 189–98.
    1. Kremer M. Population growth and technological change: one million B.C. to 1990* Q J Econ (1993) 108:681–716. 10.2307/2118405
    1. Nekola JC, Allen CD, Brown JH, Burger JR, Davidson AD, Fristoe TS, et al. . The Malthusian–Darwinian dynamic and the trajectory of civilization. Trends Ecol Evol (2013) 28:127–30. 10.1016/j.tree.2012.12.001
    1. Hazell P, Wood S. Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc Biol Sci. (2008) 363:495–515. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2166
    1. Pretty J. Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci (2008) 363:447–65. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2163
    1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAOSTAT Database: Food Balance Sheets. Rome: (2018).
    1. International Food Policy Research Institute Global Nutrition Report 2017: Nourishing the SDGs. Washington, DC: (2017).
    1. Horrigan L, Lawrence RS, Walker P. How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environ Health Perspect. (2002) 110:445–56. 10.1289/ehp.02110445
    1. Thornton PK. Livestock Production: Recent Trends, Future Prospects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. (2010) 365:2853–67. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0134
    1. Foley JA. Can we feed the world and sustain the planet? A five-step global plan could double food production by 2050 while greatly reducing environmental damage. Sci Am. (2011) 305:60–5. 10.1038/scientificamerican1111-60
    1. Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, et al. . Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature (2011) 478:337. 10.1038/nature10452
    1. Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, et al. . Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science (2010) 327:812–8. 10.1126/science.1185383
    1. McNeill S, Van Elswyk ME. Red meat in global nutrition. Meat Sci. (2012) 92:166–73. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.03.014
    1. Herrero M, Thornton PK, Notenbaert AM, Wood S, Msangi S, Freeman HA, et al. . Smart investments in sustainable food production: revisiting mixed crop-livestock systems. Science (2010) 327:822–5. 10.1126/science.1183725
    1. Cawthorn D-M, Hoffman LC. The role of traditional and non-traditional meat animals in feeding a growing and evolving world. Anim Front. (2014) 4:6–12. 10.2527/af.2014-0027
    1. Hyland JJ, Henchion M, McCarthy M, McCarthy SN. The role of meat in strategies to achieve a sustainable diet lower in greenhouse gas emissions: a review. Meat Sci. (2017) 132:189–95. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.014
    1. Nijdam D, Rood T, Westhoek H. The price of protein: review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes. Food Policy (2012) 37:760–70. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002
    1. Stoll-Kleemann S, Schmidt UJ. Reducing meat consumption in developed and transition countries to counter climate change and biodiversity loss: a review of influence factors. Region Environ Change (2017) 17:1261–77. 10.1007/s10113-016-1057-5
    1. Garnett T. Livestock and climate change. In: D'Silva J, Webster J. editors. The Meat Crisis: Developing More Sustainable and Ethical Production and Consumption. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis; (2017).
    1. Domingo JL, Nadal M. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red meat and processed meat: a review of scientific news since the IARC decision. Food Chem Toxicol. (2017) 105:256–61. 10.1016/j.fct.2017.04.028
    1. Jeyakumar A, Dissabandara L, Gopalan V. A critical overview on the biological and molecular features of red and processed meat in colorectal carcinogenesis. J Gastroenterol. (2017) 52:407–18. 10.1007/s00535-016-1294-x
    1. Boada LD, Henriquez-Hernandez LA, Luzardo OP. The impact of red and processed meat consumption on cancer and other health outcomes: Epidemiological evidences. Food Chem Toxicol. (2016) 92:236–44. 10.1016/j.fct.2016.04.008
    1. Carr PR, Walter V, Brenner H, Hoffmeister M. Meat subtypes and their association with colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer (2016) 138:293–302. 10.1002/ijc.29423
    1. Demeyer D, Mertens B, De Smet S, Ulens M. Mechanisms linking colorectal cancer to the consumption of (processed) red meat: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2016) 56:2747–66. 10.1080/10408398.2013.873886
    1. Wolk A. Potential health hazards of eating red meat. J Intern Med. (2017) 281:106–22. 10.1111/joim.12543
    1. Ekmekcioglu C, Wallner P, Kundi M, Weisz U, Haas W, Hutter H-P. Red meat, diseases, and healthy alternatives: a critical review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2016) 58:247–61. 10.1080/10408398.2016.1158148
    1. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C, Cervellin G. Meat consumption and cancer risk: a critical review of published meta-analyses. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol. (2016) 97:1–14. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.11.008
    1. Derbyshire EJ. Flexitarian diets and health: a review of the evidence-based literature. Front Nutr. (2017) 3:55. 10.3389/fnut.2016.00055
    1. McNeill SH, Belk KE, Campbell WW, Gifford CL. Coming to terms: meat's role in a healthful diet. Anim Front. (2017) 7:34–42. 10.2527/af.2017.0441
    1. American Meat Science Association Lexicon for Meat Science and Technology Allied Fields. [26 November 2017]. (2017) Available from:
    1. Marti DL, Johnson RJ, Mathews KH. Where's the (Not) Meat? Byproducts From Beef and Pork Production. (2011) LDP-M-209-01: United states department of Agriculture.
    1. Ockerman HW, Basu L. By-products edible, for human consumption. In: Dikeman M, Devine C. editors. Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences. 2nd ed: London: Elsevier; (2014). p. 104–11.
    1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations World Livestock 2011: Livestock in Food Security. (2011).
    1. Wolmarans P. Background paper on global trends in food production, intake and composition. Ann Nutr Metab. (2009) 55:244–72. 10.1159/000229005
    1. Smith J, Sones K, Grace D, MacMillan S, Tarawali S, Herrero M. Beyond milk, meat, and eggs: role of livestock in food and nutrition security. Anim Front. (2013) 3:6–13. 10.2527/af.2013-0002
    1. Simeon E, Hugo L-P, Victor M, Barry S. The role of livestock in food security and environmental protection. Outlook Agric. (1998) 27:81–7. 10.1177/003072709802700204
    1. Herrero M, Thornton PK, Notenbaert A, Msangi S, Wood S, Kruska R, et al. Drivers of Change in Crop–livestock systems and their potential impacts on agro-ecosystems services and human wellbeing to 2030: A study commissioned by the CGIAR Systemwide Livestock Programme. Nairobi: ILRI Project Report; (2012)
    1. Henchion M, McCarthy M, Resconi VC, Troy D. Meat consumption: trends and quality matters. Meat Sci. (2014) 98:561–8. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.007
    1. Wyness L, Weichselbaum E, O'Connor A, Williams EB, Benelam B, Riley H, et al. Red meat in the diet: an update. Nutr Bull. (2011) 36:34–77. 10.1111/j.1467-3010.2010.01871.x
    1. Fitt E, Mak TN, Stephen AM, Prynne C, Roberts C, Swan G, et al. . Disaggregating composite food codes in the UK national diet and nutrition survey food composition databank. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2010) 64(Suppl. 3):S32–6. 10.1038/ejcn.2010.207
    1. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DERFA) Family Food datasets. London, UK: Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs; (2017).
    1. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DERFA) Family Food 2015 Report Tables Dataset. London, UK: Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs; (2017).
    1. American Institute of Cancer Research Recommendations for Cancer Prevention. Washington, DC: American Institute of Cancer Research; (2007).
    1. National Health and Medical Research Council Australian Dietary Guidelines Summary. Canberra: (2013).
    1. National Health Service Red Meat The Risk of Bowel Cancer. (2015) [updated 04/03/2015; cited 2018 09/01/2018]; Available online at:
    1. Ministry of Health Eating and Activity Guidelines for New Zealand Adults. Wellington: (2015).
    1. World Cancer Research Fund A Closer Look at Red Meat. London: World Cancer Research Fund; (2016).
    1. McMichael AJ, Powles JW, Butler CD, Uauy R. Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. Lancet (2007) 370:1253–63. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61256-2
    1. Hodges RJ, Buzby JC, Bennett B. Postharvest losses and waste in developed and less developed countries: opportunities to improve resource use. J Agric Sci (2010) 149:37–45. 10.1017/S0021859610000936
    1. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations Global Food Losses and Food Waste: Extent, Causes and Prevention. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations; (2011).
    1. Quested T, Murphy L. Household Food and Drink Waste: A Product Focus. Banbury: CFP204; (2014).
    1. Keller C, Siegrist M. Does personality influence eating styles and food choices? Direct and indirect effects. Appetite (2015) 84:128–38. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.003
    1. Babicz-Zielinska E. Role of psychological factors in food choice - a review. Polish J Food Nutr Sci (2006) 15:379–84.
    1. Institute of Medicine Dietary reference intakes: the essential guide to nutrient requirements. In: Otten JJ, Hellwig JP, Meyers LD, editors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; (2006). p. 529–42.
    1. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition Dietary Reference Values for Energy. London: (2011).
    1. European Food Safety Authority Dietary Reference Values for Nutrients: Summary Report. Parma: (2017).
    1. McEvoy CT, Temple N, Woodside JV. Vegetarian diets, low-meat diets and health: a review. Public Health Nutr. (2012) 15:2287–94. 10.1017/S1368980012000936
    1. Willett W, Skerrett PJ. Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy: The Harvard Medical School Guide to Healthy Eating. New York, NY: Free Press; (2017).
    1. Food Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations Meat Meat Products. (2016) [updated 26 April 2016; cited 2017 26 November 2017]; Available from:
    1. Bouvard V, Loomis D, Guyton KZ, Grosse Y, Ghissassi FE, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, et al. . Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet Oncol. (2015) 16:1599–600. 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00444-1
    1. Schaafsma G. The protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS): a concept for describing protein quality in foods and food ingredients: a critical review. J AOAC Int. (2005) 88:988–94.
    1. Schaafsma G. Advantages and limitations of the protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) as a method for evaluating protein quality in human diets. Br J Nutr. (2012) 108:S333-S6. 10.1017/S0007114512002541
    1. Binnie MA, Barlow K, Johnson V, Harrison C. Red meats: Time for a paradigm shift in dietary advice. Meat Sci. (2014) 98:445–51. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.024
    1. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations Dietary Protein Quality Evalutation in Human Nutrition. Auckland. 2011 Paper 92.
    1. Phillips SM, Fulgoni VL, Heaney RP, Nicklas TA, Slavin JL, Weaver CM. Commonly consumed protein foods contribute to nutrient intake, diet quality, and nutrient adequacy. Am J Clin Nutr. (2015) 101:1346S−52S. 10.3945/ajcn.114.084079
    1. United States Department of Agriculture ARS USDA Food Composition Databases. Software developed by the National Agricultural Library v.3.8.6.4 2017-10-02 ed2017.
    1. Toldrá F, Mora L, Reig M. New insights into meat by-product utilization. Meat Sci. (2016) 120:54–9. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.021
    1. Suman SP, McMillin KW. From the editors: contributions of non-traditional meat animals to global food security and agricultural economy. Anim Front. (2014) 4:4–5.
    1. Smil V. Eating meat: evolution, patterns, and consequences. Popul Dev Rev. (2002) 28:599–639. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00599.x
    1. Dawood AA, Alkanhal MA. Nutrient composition of Najdi-camel meat. Meat Sci. (1995) 39:71–8. 10.1016/0309-1740(95)80008-5
    1. Farouk MM, Regenstein JM, Pirie MR, Najm R, Bekhit AED, Knowles SO. Spiritual aspects of meat and nutritional security: perspectives and responsibilities of the Abrahamic faiths. Food Res Int. (2015) 76:882–95. 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.05.028
    1. Schaefer D, Arp T. Importance of variety meat utilization to the meat industry. Anim Front. (2017) 7:25–8. 10.2527/af.2017.0439
    1. Farouk MM, Yoo MJY, Hamid NSA, Staincliffe M, Davies B, Knowles SO. Novel meat-enriched foods for older consumers. Food Res Int. (2017) 104:134–42. 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.033
    1. Farouk MM, Knowles SO, Maqbool N. More than a balanced diet: combifoods for enhanced nutrient functionality. NZ Food Technol. (2009) 44:29.
    1. Mullen AM, Álvarez C, Zeugolis DI, Henchion M, O'Neill E, Drummond L. Alternative uses for co-products: harnessing the potential of valuable compounds from meat processing chains. Meat Sci. (2017) 132:90–8. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.243
    1. Baiano A. Recovery of biomolecules from food wastes — a review. Molecules (2014) 19. 10.3390/molecules190914821
    1. Sabarez H. Powdered Desiccated Liver Preparation. Sydney: Meat and Livestock Australia Ltd; (2015).
    1. Prakash F.C.G, Bhandari S.B. Review of 3D Printing and Potential Red Meat Applications. Project V.RMH.0034 (2015)
    1. Farouk MM. Futuristic Meat-Based Products for the Ageing Population. NZ Food Technology (2014).
    1. Parfitt J, Barthel M, Macnaughton S. Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci. (2010) 365:3065–81. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0126
    1. Caldwell W, Pinkney D, Robson D, Chalel I. Mobile processing: opportunities in the local meat sector (2014).
    1. The Economist Intelligence Unit Global Food Security Index 2014 Special Report: Food Loss and its Intersection with Food Security. (2014).
    1. TNS BMRB. Food Waste PR Survey Summary Findings June 2016. Belfast: Food Standards Agency; (2016).
    1. Food Standards Agency FSA urges public to 'face freezer fears' in a bid to tackle food waste. Food Standards Agency, (2016) [updated 4 July 2016; cited 2018 14 January]; Available from:
    1. Garnett T, Mathewson S, Angelides P, Borthwick F. Policies and Actions to Shift Eating Patterns: What Works? A Review of the Evidence of the Effectiveness of Interventions Aimed at Shifting Diets in More Sustainable and Healthy Directions. Oxford: Food Climate Research Network; (2015).
    1. Verbeke W. Impact of communication on consumers' food choices. Proc Nutr Soc. (2008) 67:281–8. 10.1017/S0029665108007179
    1. Ursin L. The ethics of the meat paradox. Environ Ethics (2013) 38:131–44. 10.5840/enviroethics201638212
    1. Dagevos H, Voordouw J. Sustainability and meat consumption: is reduction realistic? Sustainability Sci Pract Policy (2013) 9:60–9. 10.1080/15487733.2013.11908115
    1. de Boer J, Schösler H, Aiking H. “Meatless days” or “less but better”? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges. Appetite (2014) 76:120–8. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.002
    1. Forestell CA, Spaeth AM, Kane SA. To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females. Appetite (2012) 58:319–25. 10.1016/j.appet.2011.10.015

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren