Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan or Chlorthalidone vs. Combined Valsartan and Chlorthalidone in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension: The VACLOR Study

Fernando Manzur, Andrés Rico, Juan Diego Romero, Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez, Fernando Manzur, Andrés Rico, Juan Diego Romero, Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of valsartan (V) or chlorthalidone (C) monotherapy in comparison with a fixed combination of valsartan and chlorthalidone (V + C).

Methods: This 12-week multicenter randomized three-arm open-label study randomly allocated 72 patients to V or C as monotherapy or a combination of V + C. The aim was to measure changes in office systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) from baseline to week 12, in addition to medication tolerability.

Results: The proportion of patients achieving target BP in office at week 12 was not statistically different for the three groups. However, comparisons of daytime and nighttime 24-hour ABPM values from baseline to week 12 revealed significant differences in nighttime mean SBP for the three groups, due to a significantly greater reduction in the values in patients assigned to the V + C group (-14.7 vs. -8.7 vs. -10.7, P = .042, V+C; V; C, respectively). Although patients assigned to the V + C group also had greater nighttime reduction in mean DBP values compared with those in the other groups, this difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly.

Conclusion: In patients with hypertension treated with V, C, and both medications combined, the fixed combination of V + C provided a significantly greater reduction of late night to early morning BP values when interventions were assessed with 24-hour ABPM.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT.01850160, https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01850160.

Keywords: Hypertension; chlorthalidone; combined therapy; monotherapy; valsartan.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr. Juan Romero is a full-time employee of Farma. Dr. Carlos Rodriguez-Martinez has received partial compensation for statistical analysis. Data entry and statistical analyses were supported by Farma. Dr. Manzur and Dr. Rico report no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Drug allocation and time for titration.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Flow chart of the participants, according to treatment group. BP: blood pressure; V: valsartan; C: chlorthalidone.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Changes in mean office SBP and DBP values from baseline to week 12, by study treatment group. SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; V: valsartan; C: chlorthalidone.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Mean change from baseline to week 12 in mean 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure monitoring, by study treatment group. ABPM SBP: 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure monitoring, V: valsartan, C: chlorthalidone.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Mean change from baseline to week 12 in mean 24-h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure monitoring, by study treatment group. ABPM DBP: 24-h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure monitoring; V: valsartan; C: chlorthalidone.

References

    1. Forouzanfar M, Alexander L, Anderson H, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:2287–2323. 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00128-2.
    1. Lawes C, Hoorn S, Rodgers A; International Society of Hypertension. Global burden of blood-pressure-related disease, 2001. Lancet. 2008;371:1513–1518. 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60655-8.
    1. Mills K, Bundy J, Kelly T, et al. Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control: a systematic analysis of population-based studies from 90 countries. Circulation. 2016;134:441–450. 10.1161/circulationaha.115.018912.
    1. Informe técnico: Carga de enfermedad por enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles y discapacidad en Colombia. Instituto Nacional de Salud. 2015. . Consultado September 8, 2017.
    1. Pereira M, Lunet N, Azevedo A, Barros H. Differences in prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension between developing and developed countries. J Hypertens. 2009;27:963–975. doi:10.1097/hjh.0b013e3283282f65.
    1. Heerspink H, Ninomiya T, Zoungas S, et al. Effect of lowering blood pressure on cardiovascular events and mortality in patients on dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2009;373:1009–1015. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60212-9.
    1. Wing L, Reid C, Ryan P, et al. A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:583–592. doi:10.1056/nejmoa021716.
    1. James P, Oparil S, Carter B, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults. JAMA. 2014;311:507–520. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
    1. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1281–1357. doi:10.1097/.
    1. Chobanian A. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–2572. doi:10.1001/jama.289.19.2560.
    1. Paz M, de-La-Sierra A, Sáez M, et al. Treatment efficacy of anti-hypertensive drugs in monotherapy or combination: ATOM systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials according to PRISMA statement. Medicine. 2016;95:e4071. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000004071.
    1. Ernst M, Carter B, Goerdt C, et al. Comparative antihypertensive effects of hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone on ambulatory and office blood pressure. Hypertension. 2006;47:352–358. doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000203309.07140.d3.
    1. Pareek A, Messerli F, Chandurkar N, et al. Efficacy of low-dose chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide as assessed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:379–389. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.083.
    1. The ALLHAT Officers Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002;288:2981–2997. doi:10.1001/jama.288.23.2981.
    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;7:1269–1324. doi:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065.
    1. Summary of 1993 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of mild hypertension. Subcommittee of WHO/ISH Mild Hypertension Liaison Committee. BMJ. 1993;307:1541–1546. doi:10.1136/bmj.307.6918.1541.
    1. Sheppard J, Hodgkinson J, Riley R, Martin U, Bayliss S, McManus R. Prognostic significance of the morning blood pressure surge in clinical practice: a systematic review. Am J Hypertens. 2014;28:30–41. doi:10.1093/ajh/hpu104.
    1. Sica D. Chlorthalidone – a renaissance in use? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009;10:2037–2039. doi:10.1517/14656560903158956.
    1. Kario K. Morning surge in blood pressure as a predictor of silent and clinical cerebrovascular disease in elderly hypertensives: a prospective study. Circulation. 2003;107:1401–1406. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000056521.67546.aa.
    1. Taylor AA, Siragy H, Nesbitt S. Angiotensin receptor blockers: pharmacology, efficacy, and safety. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:677–686. doi:101111j17517176201100518x.
    1. Heran BS, Wong MM, Heran IK, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;4:CD003822.
    1. Carter BL, Ernst ME, Cohen JD. Hydrochlorothiazide versus chlorthalidone: evidence supporting their interchangeability. Hypertension. 2004;43:4–9.
    1. Radauceanu A, Boivin J, Bernaud C, Fay R, Zannad F. Differential time effect profiles of amlodipine, as compared to valsartan, revealed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, self blood pressure measurements and dose omission protocol. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004;18:483–491. doi:10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00269.x.
    1. Madi J, Oigman W, Franco R, Armaganijan D. Valsartan alone and as part of combination therapy in general practice in Brazil. Int J Clin Pract. 2001;55:520–523.
    1. Accetto R, Chazova IY, Sirenko Y, Vincelj J, Widimsky J, Jr, Barbič-Žagar B. The efficacy and safety of valsartan and combination of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension – the VICTORY trial. Kardiol Pol. 2017;75:55–64.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren