The use of dynamic O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET in the diagnosis of patients with progressive and recurrent glioma

Norbert Galldiks, Gabriele Stoffels, Christian Filss, Marion Rapp, Tobias Blau, Caroline Tscherpel, Garry Ceccon, Veronika Dunkl, Martin Weinzierl, Michael Stoffel, Michael Sabel, Gereon R Fink, Nadim J Shah, Karl-Josef Langen, Norbert Galldiks, Gabriele Stoffels, Christian Filss, Marion Rapp, Tobias Blau, Caroline Tscherpel, Garry Ceccon, Veronika Dunkl, Martin Weinzierl, Michael Stoffel, Michael Sabel, Gereon R Fink, Nadim J Shah, Karl-Josef Langen

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the diagnostic value of static and dynamic O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) PET parameters in patients with progressive or recurrent glioma.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 132 dynamic (18)F-FET PET and conventional MRI scans of 124 glioma patients (primary World Health Organization grade II, n = 55; grade III, n = 19; grade IV, n = 50; mean age, 52 ± 14 y). Patients had been referred for PET assessment with clinical signs and/or MRI findings suggestive of tumor progression or recurrence based on Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Maximum and mean tumor/brain ratios of (18)F-FET uptake were determined (20-40 min post-injection) as well as tracer uptake kinetics (ie, time to peak and patterns of the time-activity curves). Diagnoses were confirmed histologically (95%) or by clinical follow-up (5%). Diagnostic accuracies of PET and MR parameters for the detection of tumor progression or recurrence were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analyses/chi-square test.

Results: Tumor progression or recurrence could be diagnosed in 121 of 132 cases (92%). MRI and (18)F-FET PET findings were concordant in 84% and discordant in 16%. Compared with the diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI to diagnose tumor progression or recurrence (85%), a higher accuracy (93%) was achieved by (18)F-FET PET when a mean tumor/brain ratio ≥2.0 or time to peak <45 min was present (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 100%; accuracy, 93%; positive predictive value, 100%; P < .001).

Conclusion: Static and dynamic (18)F-FET PET parameters differentiate progressive or recurrent glioma from treatment-related nonneoplastic changes with higher accuracy than conventional MRI.

Keywords: FET PET; malignant glioma; progressive disease; tumor recurrence.

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
A 70-year-old patient with an anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III). (Top row, left) Contrast-enhanced MRI 31 months after radiation therapy suggests tumor progression. (Top row, middle) In contrast, 18F-FET shows only slight metabolic activity (TBRmax, 1.4), and (top row, right) the time–activity curve shows a constantly increasing 18F-FET uptake, consistent with treatment-related changes. (Bottom row, right) After a stereotactic-guided biopsy, histological examination yielded signs of radiation-induced necrosis (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] staining, original magnification ×200; scale bar, 50 µm). (Bottom row, left) Brain parenchyma shows reactive changes and blood vessels with thickened hyalinized walls (arrows; H&E staining, original magnification ×100; scale bar, 1.000 µm).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
A 35-year-old patient with initial diagnosis of a diffuse astrocytoma (WHO grade II). Follow-up MRI 86 months after initial diagnosis shows a slight progression of the hyperintensity in the T2-weighted MRI, but no clear contrast enhancement in the right temporal. In contrast, 18F-FET shows highly increased metabolic activity (TBRmax, 3.9) in the right temporal, and the time–activity curve shows an early 18F-FET uptake (<20 min) followed by a descent (pattern III), consistent with tumor recurrence. After a stereotactic-guided biopsy of the metabolically active tumor, histological examination was consistent with a malignant progression to an anaplastic oligoastrocytoma (WHO grade III).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren