Human-origin probiotic cocktail increases short-chain fatty acid production via modulation of mice and human gut microbiome

Ravinder Nagpal, Shaohua Wang, Shokouh Ahmadi, Joshua Hayes, Jason Gagliano, Sargurunathan Subashchandrabose, Dalane W Kitzman, Thomas Becton, Russel Read, Hariom Yadav, Ravinder Nagpal, Shaohua Wang, Shokouh Ahmadi, Joshua Hayes, Jason Gagliano, Sargurunathan Subashchandrabose, Dalane W Kitzman, Thomas Becton, Russel Read, Hariom Yadav

Abstract

The gut bacteria producing metabolites like short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs; e.g., acetate, propionate and butyrate), are frequently reduced in Patients with diabetes, obesity, autoimmune disorders, and cancers. Hence, microbiome modulators such as probiotics may be helpful in maintaining or even restoring normal gut microbiome composition to benefit host health. Herein, we developed a human-origin probiotic cocktail with the ability to modulate gut microbiota to increase native SCFA production. Following a robust protocol of isolation, characterization and safety validation of infant gut-origin Lactobacillus and Enterococcus strains with probiotic attributes (tolerance to simulated gastric and intestinal conditions, adherence to intestinal epithelial cells, absence of potential virulence genes, cell-surface hydrophobicity, and susceptibility to common antibiotics), we select 10 strains (5 from each genera) out of total 321 isolates. A single dose (oral gavage) as well as 5 consecutive doses of this 10-strain probiotic cocktail in mice modulates gut microbiome and increases SCFA production (particularly propionate and butyrate). Inoculation of these probiotics in human feces also increases SCFA production along with microbiome modulation. Results indicate that human-origin probiotic lactobacilli and enterococci could ameliorate gut microbiome dysbiosis and hence may prove to be a potential therapy for diseases involving reduced SCFAs production in the gut.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart depicting the process of isolation, characterization, and screening of human-origin probiotic lactobacilli and enterococci strains used in these experiments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Human-origin probiotics inhibit uropathogenic bacterial growth. (a,b) Probiotic culture supernatant significantly reduced growth of clinical isolate of the human uropathogen E. coli (a) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (b) based on well diffusion assays. (c,d) Anti-microbial activity of probiotics supernatant against E. coli after heat (c) and proteinase K (d) treatments. (e) Neutralizing pH to 6.5 of probiotic supernatant abolished antimicrobial activity against E. coli. (f) Lactate inhibits E. coli in a dose-dependent fashion. (gi) Probiotic produced significant amount of organic acid like lactate (g), acetate (h) and butyrate (i) in the supernatant. All the values plotted are means of 3–6 replicates or independent experiments and standard error of means. All the values are significantly different compared to media only (no-zone) control.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Single-dose feeding of human-origin probiotics causes mild changes in gut microbiome and increases SCFA production in the mouse gut. (a) PCA analysis showing the β-diversity clustering of gut microbiome from mice (n = 6 each group) treated with single-dose of five lactobacilli, five enterococci, and the cocktail containing all 10 strains, before treatment (0 h) and after 8 h, 1d, 3d and 10d of feeding. (b) Shannon index representing the alpha-diversity of gut microbiome at 0 h and after 8 h, 1d, 3d and 10d of lactobacilli, enterococci and cocktail treatments compared to non-treated control groups. (c) Major changes in bacteria phyla after a single dose of probiotics for 10 days. (d) Cladograms of linear discrimination analysis (LDA) showing clustering of gut microbiome after 1d of single-dose treatment of lactobacilli (upper panel), enterococci (middle panel) and cocktail (lower panel) compared to control group. (e) Fecal levels of SCFAs, lactate (upper panel), acetate (upper middle panel), propionate (lower middle panel) and butyrate (lower panel) increase after lactobacilli, enterococci and cocktail treatments. Values are mean ± SEM of n = 6 animals per group. Each dot in PCA analysis represents 2 samples pooled from 2 independent mice from same group, hence gut microbiome data will have this factor in all the data analyses at different time-points. SCFAs data represents duplicates of 5–6 and standard error of means. Values with *<0.05, **0.01 and ***0.001 are significantly different within the same group compared to 0 h time point. Values with ● < 0.05, ●● < 0.01 are significantly different compared to controls at the same time points.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Five-day feeding of selected probiotics significantly increases microbiome diversity and SCFAs production in the mouse gut. (a) PCA analysis showing the β-diversity clustering of gut microbiome in mice after 5 days of once-daily feeding of lactobacilli, enterococci and their combination (cocktail) and non-treated control mice on 0d (before treatment), 5d, 2wks, 3wks and 5wks (after 1, 2 and 4 weeks of treatment). (b) Alpha-diversity (Shannon index) in mice undergoing 5 days of once-daily feeding of lactobacilli, enterococci and cocktail compared to control mice. (c) Major phyla changes upon 5 days of once-daily feeding of probiotic treatments up to 5 weeks. (d) Cladogram showing microbial signatures upon 5 days of once-daily feeding of lactobacilli, enterococci and cocktail compared to control mice. (e) SCFAs including lactate, acetate, propionate and butyrate levels after 5 days of once-daily feeding of probiotics treatment over the time course up to 30 days. Each dot in PCA analysis represents 2 samples pooled from 2 independent mice from same group, hence gut microbiome data will have this factor in all the data analyses at different time-points. SCFA data are duplicates of 5–6 and standard error of means. Values with *<0.05, **0.01 and ***0.001 are significantly different within the same group compared to 0 h time point. Values with ● < 0.05, ●● < 0.01 are significantly different compared to controls at the same time points.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Probiotic inoculation differentially changes the human fecal microbiome ex-vivo with increased production of SCFAs. (a) PCA analysis of human fecal microbiome showing beta-diversity upon treatment with lactobacilli, enterococci and probiotics cocktail after 9 and 24 h of anaerobic incubation in conditioned medium following the probiotic inoculation. (b,c) Shannon index (b) and major phyla changes upon lactobacilli, enterococci and cocktail treatment over the time up to 24 h. (d) Microbial cladogram indicating microbial clustering of human fecal microbiome in lactobacilli, enterococci and cocktail treated specimen compared to control specimen. (e) SCFAs including lactate, acetate, propionate and butyrate levels in human fecal microbiome after lactobacilli, enterococci and cocktail treatment up to 24 h. Values with *< 0.05, **0.01 and ***0.001 are significantly different within the same group compared to 0 h time point. Values with ● < 0.05, ●● < 0.01 are significantly different compared to controls at the same time points.

References

    1. Human Microbiome Project, C. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature486, 207–214 10.1038/nature11234 (2012).
    1. Velasquez-Manoff M. Gut microbiome: the peacekeepers. Nature. 2015;518:S3–11. doi: 10.1038/518S3a.
    1. Hollister EB, Gao C, Versalovic J. Compositional and functional features of the gastrointestinal microbiome and their effects on human health. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1449–1458. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.01.052.
    1. Tremlett H, Bauer KC, Appel-Cresswell S, Finlay BB, Waubant E. The gut microbiome in human neurological disease: A review. Ann Neurol. 2017;81:369–382. doi: 10.1002/ana.24901.
    1. Mazidi M, Rezaie P, Kengne AP, Mobarhan MG, Ferns GA. Gut microbiome and metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2016;10:S150–157. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2016.01.024.
    1. Cani PD, Delzenne NM. The gut microbiome as therapeutic target. Pharmacol Ther. 2011;130:202–212. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.01.012.
    1. Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes. 2016;7:189–200. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1134082.
    1. Sun M, Wu W, Liu Z, Cong Y. Microbiota metabolite short chain fatty acids, GPCR, and inflammatory bowel diseases. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1242-9.
    1. Fellows R, et al. Microbiota derived short chain fatty acids promote histone crotonylation in the colon through histone deacetylases. Nat Commun. 2018;9:105. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02651-5.
    1. Ho RH, et al. In Silico and in Vitro Interactions between Short Chain Fatty Acids and Human Histone Deacetylases. Biochemistry-Us. 2017;56:4871–4878. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00508.
    1. Scheppach W. Effects of short chain fatty acids on gut morphology and function. Gut. 1994;35:S35–38. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.1_Suppl.S35.
    1. Riviere A, Selak M, Lantin D, Leroy F, De Vuyst L. Bifidobacteria and Butyrate-Producing Colon Bacteria: Importance and Strategies for Their Stimulation in the Human Gut. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:979. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00979.
    1. Bhutia YD, Ganapathy V. Short, but Smart: SCFAs Train T Cells in the Gut to Fight Autoimmunity in the Brain. Immunity. 2015;43:629–631. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.09.014.
    1. Hu J, Lin S, Zheng B, Cheung PCK. Short-chain fatty acids in control of energy metabolism. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018;58:1243–1249. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1245650.
    1. Vieira AT, Fukumori C, Ferreira CM. New insights into therapeutic strategies for gut microbiota modulation in inflammatory diseases. Clin Transl Immunology. 2016;5:e87. doi: 10.1038/cti.2016.38.
    1. Hill C, et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11:506–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66.
    1. Ganji-Arjenaki M, Rafieian-Kopaei M. Probiotics are a good choice in remission of inflammatory bowel diseases: A meta analysis and systematic review. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:2091–2103. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25911.
    1. Chang HY, et al. Multiple strains probiotics appear to be the most effective probiotics in the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis and mortality: An updated meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0171579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171579.
    1. Yadav H, Lee JH, Lloyd J, Walter P, Rane SG. Beneficial metabolic effects of a probiotic via butyrate-induced GLP-1 hormone secretion. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:25088–25097. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.452516.
    1. Uusitalo U, et al. Association of Early Exposure of Probiotics and Islet Autoimmunity in the TEDDY Study. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:20–28. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2757.
    1. Collins MD, Gibson GR. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: approaches for modulating the microbial ecology of the gut. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:1052S–1057S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.5.1052s.
    1. Hemarajata P, Versalovic J. Effects of probiotics on gut microbiota: mechanisms of intestinal immunomodulation and neuromodulation. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013;6:39–51. doi: 10.1177/1756283X12459294.
    1. Nikbakht E, et al. Effect of probiotics and synbiotics on blood glucose: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Eur J Nutr. 2018;57:95–106. doi: 10.1007/s00394-016-1300-3.
    1. Pessione E. Lactic acid bacteria contribution to gut microbiota complexity: lights and shadows. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:86. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00086.
    1. Yadav H, Jain S, Sinha PR. Production of free fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid in probiotic dahi containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei during fermentation and storage. International Dairy Journal. 2007;17:1006–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2006.12.003.
    1. Morelli L, Capurso L. FAO/WHO guidelines on probiotics: 10 years later. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46 Suppl:S1–2. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318269fdd5.
    1. Sanders, M. E. Probiotics: definition, sources, selection, and uses. Clin Infect Dis 46 Suppl 2, S58–61; discussionS144–151, 10.1086/523341 (2008).
    1. Chapman CM, Gibson GR, Rowland I. Health benefits of probiotics: are mixtures more effective than single strains? Eur J Nutr. 2011;50:1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00394-010-0166-z.
    1. MacPherson CW, Shastri P, Mathieu O, Tompkins TA, Burguiere P. Genome-Wide Immune Modulation of TLR3-Mediated Inflammation in Intestinal Epithelial Cells Differs between Single and Multi-Strain Probiotic Combination. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169847.
    1. Yatsunenko T, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 2012;486:222–227. doi: 10.1038/nature11053.
    1. Smillie CS, et al. Ecology drives a global network of gene exchange connecting the human microbiome. Nature. 2011;480:241–244. doi: 10.1038/nature10571.
    1. Mobley HL, et al. Pyelonephritogenic Escherichia coli and killing of cultured human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells: role of hemolysin in some strains. Infect Immun. 1990;58:1281–1289.
    1. Broberg, C. A., Wu, W., Cavalcoli, J. D., Miller, V. L. & Bachman, M. A. Complete Genome Sequence of Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain ATCC 43816 KPPR1, a Rifampin-Resistant Mutant Commonly Used in Animal, Genetic, and Molecular Biology Studies. Genome Announc2, 10.1128/genomeA.00924-14 (2014).
    1. Santagati M, Scillato M, Patane F, Aiello C, Stefani S. Bacteriocin-producing oral streptococci and inhibition of respiratory pathogens. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012;65:23–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00928.x.
    1. Gordon DM. The potential of bacteriocin-producing probiotics and associated caveats. Future Microbiol. 2009;4:941–943. doi: 10.2217/fmb.09.78.
    1. Weiss G. Intestinal irony: how probiotic bacteria outcompete bad bugs. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:3–4. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.07.003.
    1. Behnsen J, Deriu E, Sassone-Corsi M, Raffatellu M. Probiotics: properties, examples, and specific applications. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3:a010074. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a010074.
    1. Wang X, Quinn PJ. Endotoxins: lipopolysaccharides of gram-negative bacteria. Subcell Biochem. 2010;53:3–25. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9078-2_1.
    1. Neal-McKinney JM, et al. Production of organic acids by probiotic lactobacilli can be used to reduce pathogen load in poultry. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043928.
    1. McNabney, S. M. & Henagan, T. M. Short Chain Fatty Acids in the Colon and Peripheral Tissues: A Focus on Butyrate, Colon Cancer, Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Nutrients9, 10.3390/nu9121348 (2017).
    1. Roediger WE, Millard S. Selective inhibition of fatty acid oxidation in colonocytes by ibuprofen: a cause of colitis? Gut. 1995;36:55–59. doi: 10.1136/gut.36.1.55.
    1. Binder HJ. Role of colonic short-chain fatty acid transport in diarrhea. Annu Rev Physiol. 2010;72:297–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135817.
    1. Richards JL, Yap YA, McLeod KH, Mackay CR, Marino E. Dietary metabolites and the gut microbiota: an alternative approach to control inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Clin Transl Immunology. 2016;5:e82. doi: 10.1038/cti.2016.29.
    1. Bischoff SC, et al. Intestinal permeability–a new target for disease prevention and therapy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14:189. doi: 10.1186/s12876-014-0189-7.
    1. den Besten G, et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. Journal of lipid research. 2013;54:2325–2340. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R036012.
    1. Priyadarshini M, Wicksteed B, Schiltz GE, Gilchrist A, Layden BT. SCFA Receptors in Pancreatic beta Cells: Novel Diabetes Targets? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2016;27:653–664. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2016.03.011.
    1. Soret R, et al. Short-chain fatty acids regulate the enteric neurons and control gastrointestinal motility in rats. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:1772–1782. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.053.
    1. Eloe-Fadrosh, E. A. et al. Functional dynamics of the gut microbiome in elderly people during probiotic consumption. MBio6, 10.1128/mBio.00231-15 (2015).
    1. Schmidt TSB, Raes J, Bork P. The Human Gut Microbiome: From Association to Modulation. Cell. 2018;172:1198–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.044.
    1. Barcenilla A, et al. Phylogenetic relationships of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human gut. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:1654–1661. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.4.1654-1661.2000.
    1. Louis P, Flint HJ. Formation of propionate and butyrate by the human colonic microbiota. Environmental microbiology. 2017;19:29–41. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13589.
    1. Bartholomew JW, Mittwer T. The Gram stain. Bacteriol Rev. 1952;16:1–29.
    1. Eaton TJ, Gasson MJ. Molecular screening of Enterococcus virulence determinants and potential for genetic exchange between food and medical isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:1628–1635. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.4.1628-1635.2001.
    1. Casarotti SN, et al. In vitro assessment of safety and probiotic potential characteristics of Lactobacillus strains isolated from water buffalo mozzarella cheese. Annals of Microbiology. 2017;67:289–301. doi: 10.1007/s13213-017-1258-2.
    1. Nagpal R, Kumar A, Arora S. In vitro probiotic potential of lactobacilli isolated from indigenous fermented milk products. International Journal of Probiotics & Prebiotics. 2010;5:105–112.
    1. Zarate G, Chaia AP, Gonzalez S, Oliver G. Viability and beta-galactosidase activity of dairy propionibacteria subjected to digestion by artificial gastric and intestinal fluids. J Food Prot. 2000;63:1214–1221. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-63.9.1214.
    1. Jacobsen CN, et al. Screening of probiotic activities of forty-seven strains of Lactobacillus spp. by in vitro techniques and evaluation of the colonization ability of five selected strains in humans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:4949–4956.
    1. Munoz-Quezada S, et al. Isolation, identification and characterisation of three novel probiotic strains (Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-4034, Bifidobacterium breve CNCM I-4035 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-4036) from the faeces of exclusively breast-fed infants. Br J Nutr. 2013;109(Suppl 2):S51–62. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512005211.
    1. Aspri M, et al. Application of bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus faecium isolated from donkey milk, in the bio-control of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh whey cheese. International Dairy Journal. 2017;73:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2017.04.008.
    1. Mao, N., Cubillos-Ruiz, A., Cameron, D. E. & Collins, J. J. Probiotic strains detect and suppress cholera in mice. Sci Transl Med10, 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao2586 (2018).
    1. Preidis GA, et al. Probiotics stimulate enterocyte migration and microbial diversity in the neonatal mouse intestine. Faseb J. 2012;26:1960–1969. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-177980.
    1. Cervantes-Barragan L, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri induces gut intraepithelial CD4(+)CD8alphaalpha(+) T cells. Science. 2017;357:806–810. doi: 10.1126/science.aah5825.
    1. Boler BMV, et al. In Vitro Fermentation Characteristics of Select Nondigestible Oligosaccharides by Infant Fecal Inocula. J Agr Food Chem. 2013;61:2109–2119. doi: 10.1021/jf305056f.
    1. Nagpal R, et al. Gut microbiome composition in non-human primates consuming a western or mediterranean diet. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2018;5:1–9. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00028.
    1. Caporaso JG, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303.
    1. Segata N, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren