Diagnostic accuracy of evaluation of suspected syncope in the emergency department: usual practice vs. ESC guidelines

Veera K van Wijnen, Reinold O B Gans, Wouter Wieling, Jan C Ter Maaten, Mark P M Harms, Veera K van Wijnen, Reinold O B Gans, Wouter Wieling, Jan C Ter Maaten, Mark P M Harms

Abstract

Background: Syncope is a frequent reason for referral to the emergency department. After excluding a potentially life-threatening condition, the second objective is to find the cause of syncope. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the treating physician in usual practice and to compare this to the diagnostic accuracy of a standardised evaluation, consisting of thorough history taking and physical examination by a research physician.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included suspected (pre) syncope patients without an identified serious underlying condition who were assessed in the emergency department. Patients were initially seen by the initial treating physician and the usual evaluation was performed. A research physician, blinded to the findings of the initial treating physician, then performed a standardised evaluation according to the ESC syncope guidelines. Diagnostic accuracy (proportion of correct diagnoses) was determined by expert consensus after long-term follow-up.

Results: One hundred and one suspected (pre) syncope patients were included (mean age 59 ± 20 years). The usual practice of the initial treating physicians did not in most cases follow ESC syncope guidelines, with orthostatic blood pressure measurements made in only 40% of the patients. Diagnostic accuracy by the initial treating physicians was 65% (95% CI 56-74%), while standardised evaluation resulted in a diagnostic accuracy of 80% (95% CI 71-87%; p = 0.009). No life-threatening causes were missed.

Conclusions: Usual practice of the initial treating physician resulted in a diagnostic accuracy of 65%, while standardised practice, with an emphasis on thorough history taking, increased diagnostic accuracy to 80%. Results suggest that the availability of additional resources does not result in a higher diagnostic accuracy than standardised evaluation, and that history taking is the most important diagnostic test in suspected syncope patients. Netherlands Trial Registration: NTR5651. Registered 29 January 2016, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5532.

Keywords: Diagnostic accuracy; Emergency department; Guidelines; History taking; Syncope.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagnostic accuracy of the initial treating physicians and research physician against the reference standard. The bar with slashes represents the total misdiagnoses by the initial treating physicians and research physician. Vasovagal and situational syncope were grouped together under reflex syncope

References

    1. Writing Committee Members, Shen WK, Sheldon RS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society, Heart Rhythm 2017;14:e155–e217.
    1. Mechanic OJ, Pascheles CY, Lopez GJ, Winans AM, Shapiro NI, Tibbles C, et al. Using the Boston Syncope observation management pathway to reduce hospital admission and adverse outcomes. West J Emerg Med. 2019;20(2):250–255. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.11.39657.
    1. Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange FJ, et al. 2018 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:1883–1948. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy037.
    1. Linzer M, Yang EH, Estes NA, 3rd, et al. Diagnosing syncope. Part 1: value of history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Clinical efficacy assessment project of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:989–996. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-12-199706150-00012.
    1. Huff JS, Decker WW, Quinn JV, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:431–444. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.02.001.
    1. Disertori M, Brignole M, Menozzi C, et al. Management of patients with syncope referred urgently to general hospitals. Europace. 2003;5:283–291. doi: 10.1016/S1099-5129(03)00049-7.
    1. van Dijk N, Boer KR, Colman N, et al. High diagnostic yield and accuracy of history, physical examination, and ECG in patients with transient loss of consciousness in FAST: the fainting assessment study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19:48–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01215.x.
    1. Sarasin FP, Louis-Simonet M, Carballo D, et al. Prospective evaluation of patients with syncope: a population-based study. Am J Med. 2001;111:177–184. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(01)00797-5.
    1. Brignole M, Ungar A, Bartoletti A, et al. Standardized-care pathway vs. usual management of syncope patients presenting as emergencies at general hospitals. Europace. 2006;8:644–650. doi: 10.1093/europace/eul071.
    1. Olde Nordkamp LR, van Dijk N, Ganzeboom KS, et al. Syncope prevalence in the ED compared to general practice and population: a strong selection process. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27:271–279. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.02.022.
    1. Blanc JJ, L’Her C, Touiza A, et al. Prospective evaluation and outcome of patients admitted for syncope over a 1 year period. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:815–820. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2975.
    1. Grossman SA, Babineau M, Burke L, et al. Do outcomes of near syncope parallel syncope? Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:203–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.11.001.
    1. Wieling W, van Dijk N, de Lange FJ, et al. History taking as a diagnostic test in patients with syncope: developing expertise in syncope. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:277–280. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu478.
    1. Sutton R, van Dijk N, Wieling W. Clinical history in management of suspected syncope: a powerful diagnostic tool. Cardiol J. 2014;21:651–657. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2014.0097.
    1. Wieling W, Thijs RD, Linzer M, et al. Great expectations: what patients with unexplained syncope desire. J Intern Med. 2016;279:259–264. doi: 10.1111/joim.12450.
    1. van Dijk JG, Thijs RD, Benditt DG, et al. A guide to disorders causing transient loss of consciousness: focus on syncope. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009;5:438–448. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.99.
    1. Krediet CT, Jardine DL, Wieling W. Dissection of carotid sinus hypersensitivity: the timing of vagal and vasodepressor effects and the effect of body position. Clin Sci (Lond) 2011;121:389–396. doi: 10.1042/CS20100607.
    1. Benditt DG. Syncope risk assessment in the emergency department and clinic. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;55:376–381. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.10.010.
    1. Shin TG, Kim JS, Song HG, et al. Standardized approaches to syncope evaluation for reducing hospital admissions and costs in overcrowded emergency departments, Yonsei. Med J. 2013;54:1110–1118.
    1. Cannom DS. History of syncope in the cardiac literature. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;55:334–338. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.11.013.
    1. Wieling W, Thijs RD, van Dijk N, et al. Symptoms and signs of syncope: a review of the link between physiology and clinical clues. Brain. 2009;132:2630–2642. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp179.
    1. de Jong JSY, de Lange FJ, van Dijk N, et al. Syncopedia: training a new generation of syncope specialists. Clin Auton Res. 2018;28:173–6.
    1. Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG, et al. Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:878–885. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012407.
    1. Toarta C, Mukarram M, Arcot K, et al. Syncope prognosis based on emergency department diagnosis: a prospective cohort study. Acad Emerg Med. 2018;25:388–396. doi: 10.1111/acem.13346.
    1. Ricci F, De Caterina R, Fedorowski A. Orthostatic hypotension: epidemiology, prognosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:848–860. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1084.
    1. Romme JJ, Reitsma JB, Go-Schon IK, et al. Prospective evaluation of non-pharmacological treatment in vasovagal syncope. Europace. 2010;12:567–573. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup414.
    1. van Wijnen VK, Harms MP, Go-Schon IK, et al. Initial orthostatic hypotension in teenagers and young adults. Clin Auton Res. 2016;26:441–449. doi: 10.1007/s10286-016-0382-6.
    1. van Wijnen VK, Finucane C, Harms MPM, et al. Noninvasive beat-to-beat finger arterial pressure monitoring during orthostasis: a comprehensive review of normal and abnormal responses at different ages. J Intern Med. 2017;282:468–483. doi: 10.1111/joim.12636.
    1. Kenny RA, Brignole M, Dan GA, et al. Syncope unit: rationale and requirement--the European heart rhythm association position statement endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace. 2015;17:1325–1340. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv115.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren