Early experience with unsedated ultrathin 4.9 mm transnasal gastroscopy: a pilot study

Justin Cheung, Robert Bailey, Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten, Ross McLean, Richard N Fedorak, John Morse, Mario Millan, Tom Guzowski, Karen J Goodman, CANHelp working group, Karen Goodman, Justin Cheung, Richard Fedorak, Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten, Mario Millan, Robert Bailey, John Morse, Tom Guzowski, Justin Cheung, Robert Bailey, Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten, Ross McLean, Richard N Fedorak, John Morse, Mario Millan, Tom Guzowski, Karen J Goodman, CANHelp working group, Karen Goodman, Justin Cheung, Richard Fedorak, Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten, Mario Millan, Robert Bailey, John Morse, Tom Guzowski

Abstract

Background: Unsedated transnasal gastroscopy is a technique with unverified clinical advantages.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and procedure times with transnasal gastroscopy by physicians with no previous experience in transnasal endoscopy.

Methods: Unsedated transnasal gastroscopy using 4.9 mm ultrathin transnasal gastroscopes with randomization to two different biopsy forceps was prospectively evaluated during a single day in January 2008. The outcomes included patient tolerance (scale: 1, no discomfort; 10, severe discomfort), physician technical assessment (1, excellent; 10, very poor), gastric biopsy quality, adverse events and procedure times.

Results: Twenty patients underwent transnasal gastroscopy. Nineteen patients (95%) successfully completed transnasal gastroscopy. The patient-reported mean (+/- SD) overall discomfort level during the procedure was 4.0+/-1.9 compared with a physician-estimated level of 3.2+/-1.7 (P=0.04). Only 10% (n=2) reported they would have preferred sedated over unsedated gastroscopy. Mean total encounter time from anesthesia to discharge was 33.5+/-9.3 min. The time from anesthesia to insertion was 7.0+/-5.3 min and from room exit to discharge 6.2+/-2.9 min. No patients who had gastric biopsies taken (zero of 14) had any of unacceptable quality. The only adverse event was distressing sensations (dyspnea, dizziness) in one patient that started during pre-endoscopy anesthetic application, persisting postendoscopy, but without any abnormalities in vital signs.

Conclusion: Assuming the adverse event was a rare reaction, early experience with unsedated ultrathin transnasal gastroscopy was an efficient, effective and well-tolerated procedure for evaluation of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Figures

Figure 1)
Figure 1)
The completion rate for unsedated transnasal gastroscopy (n=20)
Figure 2)
Figure 2)
Postendoscopy survey of patient preference of unsedated versus sedated gastroscopy (n=20)
Figure 3)
Figure 3)
Overall discomfort score during unsedated endoscopy reported by physician versus patient (n=20)

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren