A placebo-controlled trial of folic acid and betaine in identical twins with Angelman syndrome

Julia Han, Terry Jo Bichell, Stephanie Golden, Irina Anselm, Susan Waisbren, Carlos A Bacino, Sarika U Peters, Lynne M Bird, Virginia Kimonis, Julia Han, Terry Jo Bichell, Stephanie Golden, Irina Anselm, Susan Waisbren, Carlos A Bacino, Sarika U Peters, Lynne M Bird, Virginia Kimonis

Abstract

Background: Angelman syndrome (AS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that is caused by maternal genetic deficiency of a gene that encodes E6-AP ubiquitin-protein ligase (gene symbol UBE3A) mapping to chromosome 15q11-q13. AS leads to stiff and jerky gait, excess laughter, seizures, and severe intellectual disability. In some parts of the brain, the paternally inherited UBE3A gene is subject to genomic imprinting by the action of the UBE3A-antisense transcript (UBE3A-ATS) on the paternally inherited allele. Consequently, only the maternally inherited UBE3A gene is expressed in mature neurons. AS occurs due to deletions of the maternal 15q11 - 13 region, paternal uniparental disomy (UPD), imprinting center defects, mutations in the maternal UBE3A gene, or other unknown genetic malfunctions that result in a silenced maternal UBE3A gene in the specific imprinted regions of the brain.

Results: A potential treatment strategy for AS is to increase methylation of UBE3A-ATS to promote expression of the paternal UBE3A gene and thus ameliorate the clinical phenotypes of AS. We treated two sets of male identical twins with class I deletions with a 1 year treatment trial of either betaine and folic acid versus placebo. We found no statistically significant changes in the clinical parameters tested at the end of the 1 year trial, nor did we find any significant adverse events.

Conclusions: This study tested the hypothesis that by increasing the methylation of the UBE3A-antisense transcript in Angelman syndrome to promote expression of the silenced paternal UBE3A gene we may ameliorate the clinical phenotypes of AS. We treated two sets of identical twins with placebo versus betaine and folic acid. Although this study represented a novel approach to treating Angelman syndrome, the differences in the developmental testing results was not significant. This paper also discusses the value of monozygotic twin studies in minimizing confounding variables and its utility in conducting small treatment studies.

Trial registration: NCT00348933 . Registered 6 July 2006.

Keywords: Angelman syndrome; Betaine; Deletion; Folic acid; Methyl donors; Methylation; Silencing.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests of this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Graphs of total score differences in Bayley, Preschool Language, Vineland, and MacArthur tests across twin A, B, C, and D. *P-values calculated through Student’s t-test were not statistically significant (all p-values>0.05)

References

    1. Clayton-Smith J, Laan L. Angelman syndrome: a review of the clinical and genetic aspects. J Med Genet. 2003;40:87–95. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.2.87.
    1. Lossie AC, Whitney MM, Amidon D, Dong HJ, Chen P, Theriaque D, Hutson A, Nicholls RD, Zori RT, Williams CA, Driscoll DJ. Distinct phenotypes distinguish the molecular classes of Angelman syndrome. J Med Genet. 2001;38:834–845. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.12.834.
    1. Margolis SS, Sell GL, Zbinden MA, Bird LM. Angelman Syndrome. Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12(3):641–650. doi: 10.1007/s13311-015-0361-y.
    1. Judson MC, Sosa-Pagan JO, Del Cid WA, Han JE, Philpot BD. Allelic specificity of UBE3A expression in the mouse brain during postnatal development. J Comp Neuol. 2014;522:1874–1896. doi: 10.1002/cne.23507.
    1. Bi X, Sun J, Ji AX, Baudry M. Potential therapeutic approaches for Angelman syndrome. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2016;20:601–613. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2016.1115837.
    1. Bird LM, Tan WH, Bacino CA, Peters SU, Skinner SA, Anselm I, Barbieri-Welge R, Bauer-Carlin A, Gentile JK, Glaze DG, Horowitz LT, Mohan KN, Nespeca MP, Sahoo T, Serco D, Waisbren S, Beaudet AL. A therapeutic trial of pro-methylation dietary supplements in Angelman syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 2011;155:2956–2963. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34297.
    1. Peters SU, Bird LM, Kimonis V, Glaze DG, Shinawi LM, Bichell TJ, Barbieri-Welge R, Nespeca M, Anselm I, Waisbren S, Sanborn E, Sun Q, O’Brien WE, Beaudet AL, Bacino CA. Double-blind therapeutic trial in Angelman syndrome using betaine and folic acid. Am J Med Genet. 2010;152:1994–2001. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33509.
    1. Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant development. 2. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1993.
    1. Sparrow SS, Balla DA, Cicchetti DV. Vineland adaptive behavior scales. Interview edition: survey form manual. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service; 1984.
    1. Volden J. Using the preschool language scale, fourth edition to characterize language in preschoolers with autism Spectrum disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;20:200–208. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0035).
    1. Heilmann J. Utility of the MacArthur—bates communicative development inventory in identifying language abilities of late-talking and typically developing toddlers. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2001;14:40–51. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2005/006).
    1. LaSalle JM, Reiter LT, Chamberlain SJ. Epigenetic regulation of UBE3A and roles in human neurodevelopmental disorders. Epigenomics. 2015;7:1213–1228. doi: 10.2217/epi.15.70.
    1. Tan WH, Bird LM. Angelman syndrome: current and emerging therapies in 2016. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2016;172:384–401. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31536.
    1. Knight LS, Quinn P, Lambie I, Perkins C, Yancey PH. Betaine in the brain: characterization of betaine uptake, its influence on other Osmolytes and its potential role in neuroprotection from osmotic stress. Neurochem Res. 2017;42:3490–3503. doi: 10.1007/s11064-017-2397-3.
    1. Akshoomoff N, Corsello C, Schmidt H. The role of the autism diagnostic observation schedule in the assessment of autism spectrum disorders in school and community settings. Calif Sch Psychol. 2006;11:7–19. doi: 10.1007/BF03341111.
    1. van Dongen J, Slagboom PE, Draisma HHM, Martin NG, Boomsma DI. The continuing value of twin studies in the omics era. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:640–653. doi: 10.1038/nrg3243.
    1. Oberfield SE, Levine LS, Wellner D, Novogroder M, Laino P, New MI. Ascorbic acid treatment in nephropathic cystinosis in identical twins. Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1981;2:80–90. doi: 10.1159/000481034.
    1. Hunter D, Major P, Arden N, Swaminathan R, Andrew T, MacGregor AJ, Keen R, Snieder H, Spector TD. A randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation on preventing postmenopausal bone loss and modifying bone metabolism using identical twin pairs. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:2276–2283. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.11.2276.
    1. Ferraresi C, Betrucci D, Schiavinato J, Reiff R, Araujo A, Panepucci R, Matheucci E, Cunha AF, Arakelian VM, Hamblin M, Parizotto N, Bagnato V. Effects of light-emitting diode therapy on muscle hypertrophy, gene expression, performance, damage, and delayed-onset muscle soreness: case-control study with a pair of identical twins. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;10:746–757. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000490.
    1. Ring J. Successful hyposensitization treatment in atopic eczema: results of a trial in monozygotic twins. Br J Dermatol. 1982;107:597–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1982.tb00412.x.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren