Post hoc analysis of ellipsoid zone changes beyond the central subfield in symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion patients from the OASIS trial

Swetha Bindu Velaga, Muneeswar Gupta Nittala, Michael S Ip, Luc Duchateau, SriniVas R Sadda, Swetha Bindu Velaga, Muneeswar Gupta Nittala, Michael S Ip, Luc Duchateau, SriniVas R Sadda

Abstract

Background/aims: OASIS is a Phase IIIb trial (NCT01429441) assessing long-term outcomes in subjects with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (VMA). The purpose of this study is to report on the frequency, severity, location and time course of ellipsoid zone (EZ) alterations in ocriplasmin-treated and sham control eyes in the OASIS study.

Methods: 220 patients (146 ocriplasmin, 74 sham) subjects with VMA were enrolled in this masked post hoc analysis phase IIIb, randomised, sham-controlled double-masked multicentre clinical trial. A masked post hoc analysis of OCT images was performed at the Doheny Image Reading Center from subjects enrolled in the OASIS trial. The status of the EZ band was assessed in three different macular regions: the central subfield (CS) (≤1 mm diameter), the parafoveal area (PAA) (>1 to ≤3 mm) and the perifoveal area (PEA) (>3 to ≤6 mm). The EZ band was rated as normal/intact, full thickness macular hole (FTMH), abnormal but continuous, discontinuous/disrupted or absent at visits from baseline (pretreatment) to week 1 (day 7), month 1 (day 28), month 3, month 6, month 12 and the final follow-up at month 24. EZ band status was compared in both study and control eyes.

Results: A total of 208 patients (138 ocriplasmin, 70 sham) were included in this analysis. At baseline, FTMH was present in 48.6%, 8.0%, 0% and 52.8%, 2.9%, 0% in the CS, PAA and PEA of the ocriplasmin and sham groups, respectively. The EZ was graded to be abnormal but continuous, discontinuous/disrupted or absent at Baseline in 21.0%, 4.3%, 2.8% in the CS, PAA and PEA, respectively, of the ocriplasmin group; and 12.9%, 10.0%, 4.3% in the CS, PAA and PEA of the sham group. For the ocriplasmin group in the PAA, this frequency increased to 6.6% at week 1, was 9.8% at month 1, but improved to 3.8% at month 3, and remained stable to 1.6% at month 24. These differences, however, were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Ocriplasmin treatment for symptomatic VMA was associated with EZ abnormalities in a small percentage of patients that was best assessed in regions (PEA) relatively unaffected by the VM interface disease at baseline. The EZ abnormalities were apparent by week 1, persisted at month 1, and appeared to resolve in the majority of cases by month 3.

Trial registration number: NCT01429441.

Keywords: Treatment other; clinical trial; retina; vitreous.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Grading scale for EZ band classification. Normal/intact and four categories of abnormal EZ: presence of full thickness macular hole; abnormal but continuous; discontinuous/disrupted and absent. EZ, ellipsoid zone.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of abnormalities of the EZ in the central subfield at baseline, postinjection day 7, day 28, month 3, month 6 and month 24 in both study cohorts. Only the categories of abnormal EZ with the percentages given relative to the entire cohort (including eyes with normal/intact EZ; O-Ocriplasmin cohort, S-Sham cohort). EZ, ellipsoid zone.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative SD-OCT image of a patient with disrupted EZ at baseline and with subsequent restoration by month 3 following ocriplasmin injection. CS, central ubfield; EZ, ellipsoid zone; SD, spectral domain.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage of abnormalities of the EZ in the parafoveal area at baseline, post injection day 7, day 28, month 3, month 6 and month 24 in both study cohorts. Only the categories of abnormal EZ with the percentages given relative to the entire cohort (including eyes with normal/intact EZ; O-ocriplasmin cohort, S-Sham cohort). EZ, ellipsoid zone.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Percentage of abnormalities of the EZ in the perifoveal area at baseline, postinjection day 1, day 28, month 3, month 6 and month 24 in both study cohorts. Only the categories of abnormal EZ with the percentages given relative to the entire cohort (including eyes with normal/intact EZ; O-Ocriplasmin cohort, S-Sham cohort). EZ, ellipsoid zone.

References

    1. Jackson TL, Regillo CD, Girach A, et al. . Baseline predictors of Vitreomacular Adhesion/Traction resolution following an intravitreal injection of Ocriplasmin. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2016;47:716–23. 10.3928/23258160-20160808-04
    1. Lescrauwaet B, Duchateau L, Verstraeten T, et al. . Visual function response to ocriplasmin for the treatment of vitreomacular traction and macular hole: the OASIS study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017;58:5842–8. 10.1167/iovs.17-22363
    1. Chen W, Mo W, Sun K, et al. . Microplasmin degrades fibronectin and laminin at vitreoretinal interface and outer retina during enzymatic vitrectomy. Curr Eye Res 2009;34:1057–64. 10.3109/02713680903308487
    1. Schumann RG, Langer J, Compera D, et al. . Assessment of intravitreal ocriplasmin treatment for vitreomacular traction in clinical practice. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017;255:2081–9. 10.1007/s00417-017-3747-1
    1. Stalmans P, Benz MS, Gandorfer A, et al. . Enzymatic vitreolysis with ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction and macular holes. N Engl J Med 2012;367:606–15. 10.1056/NEJMoa1110823
    1. Itoh Y, Vasanji A, Ehlers JP. Volumetric ellipsoid zone mapping for enhanced visualisation of outer retinal integrity with optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2016;100:295–9. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307105
    1. Itoh Y, Kaiser PK, Singh RP, et al. . Assessment of retinal alterations after intravitreal ocriplasmin with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2014;121:2506–7. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.044
    1. Singh RP, Li A, Bedi R, et al. . Anatomical and visual outcomes following ocriplasmin treatment for symptomatic vitreomacular traction syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 2014;98:356–60. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304219
    1. Sadda SR, Dugel PU, Gonzalez VH, et al. . The OASIS MP-1 substudy: characterization of the effect of Ocriplasmin on microperimetry parameters. Retina 2019;39:319–30. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001982
    1. Dugel PU, Tolentino M, Feiner L, et al. . Results of the 2-year Ocriplasmin for treatment for symptomatic Vitreomacular adhesion including macular hole (OASIS) randomized trial. Ophthalmology 2016;123:2232–47. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.043
    1. Tibbetts MD, Reichel E, Witkin AJ. Vision loss after intravitreal ocriplasmin: correlation of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and electroretinography. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014;132:487–90. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.8258
    1. Margo JA, Schocket LS, Klima K, et al. . Persistent retinal changes after intravitreal ocriplasmin. Retin Cases Brief Rep 2016;10:48–51. 10.1097/ICB.0000000000000175
    1. Tschuppert S, Gerding H. Transient subfoveal fluid and visual loss after Ocriplasmin. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2016;233:453–5. 10.1055/s-0041-111807
    1. Freund KB, Shah SA, Shah VP. Correlation of transient vision loss with outer retinal disruption following intravitreal ocriplasmin. Eye 2013;27:773–4. 10.1038/eye.2013.94
    1. Cereda MG, Corvi F, Cozzi M, et al. . Optical coherence tomography 2: diagnostic tool to study peripheral vitreoretinal pathologies. Retina 2019;39:415–21. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001953
    1. Hahn P, Chung MM, Flynn HW, et al. . Safety profile of ocriplasmin for symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion: a comprehensive analysis of premarketing and postmarketing experiences. Retina 2015;35:1128–34. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000519

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren