A novel ACT-based video game to support mental health through embedded learning: a mixed-methods feasibility study protocol

Darren J Edwards, Andrew H Kemp, Darren J Edwards, Andrew H Kemp

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, serious video games have been used to promote emotional regulation in individuals with mental health issues. Although these therapeutic strategies are innovative, they are limited with respect to scope of treatment, often focusing on specific cognitive skills, to help remediate a specific mental health disorder.

Objective: Here, we propose a protocol for assessing the feasibility of a novel acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)-based video game for young adults.

Methods and analysis: The Medical Research Council (MRC) framework will be used for developing a complex intervention to design and test the feasibility of an ACT-based video game intervention using a mixed-methods approach involving qualitative and quantitative data. The primary outcomes will include feasibility testing of recruitment processes and the acceptability of the intervention through qualitative interviews, attendance and rates of attrition. Secondary outcomes will involve a series of quantitative questionnaires to obtain effect sizes for power analysis, allowing for the ideal sample size for an appropriately powered, randomised controlled trial to be determined.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Psychology Department Research Ethics Committee (2020-4929-3923) at Swansea University in the UK. Dissemination activities will involve publications in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at local and national conferences and promotion through social media.

Trial registration number: NCT04566042.

Keywords: anxiety disorders; depression & mood disorders; impulse control disorders.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: At the time of writing this, DJE is discussing with Agor IP at Swansea University the potential to commercialise the described video game as a mobile application; however, at this time no agreements have been made or signed. AHK has no competing interests.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
First scene in ‘ACTing Mind’, the character, Steve, is depressed and alone.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An example scene, where the character ‘Steve’ is in his own mind, and can see his own memories, through his Mindscape machine.

References

    1. Whiteford H, Ferrari A, Degenhardt L. Global burden of disease studies: implications for mental and substance use disorders. Health Aff 2016;35:1114–20. 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0082
    1. Patel V, Maj M, Flisher AJ, et al. . Reducing the treatment gap for mental disorders: a WPA survey. World Psychiatry 2010;9:169–76. 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00305.x
    1. Wang PS, Berglund PA, Olfson M, et al. . Delays in initial treatment contact after first onset of a mental disorder. Health Serv Res 2004;39:393–416. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00234.x
    1. Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, et al. . The Lancet commission on global mental health and sustainable development. The Lancet 2018;392:1553–98. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X
    1. Kazdin AE, Blase SL. Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness. Perspect Psychol Sci 2011;6:21–37. 10.1177/1745691610393527
    1. ESA 2019 essential facts about the computer and video game industry, 2020. Available:
    1. ISFE ISFE key facts 2019, 2020. Available:
    1. Linehan C, Kirman B, Roche B. Gamification as behavioral psychology. In the gameful world: approaches, issues, applications. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2015.
    1. Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, et al. . From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification". Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, 2011:9–15.
    1. Jon Hobbs L, Yan Z. Cracking the walnut: using a computer game to impact cognition, emotion, and behavior of highly aggressive fifth grade students. Comput Human Behav 2008;24:421–38. 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.031
    1. Jiménez-Murcia S, Fernández-Aranda F, Kalapanidas E, et al. . Playmancer project: a serious videogame as an additional therapy tool for eating and impulse control disorders. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;144:163–6.
    1. Ducharme P, Wharff E, Hutchinson E, et al. . Videogame assisted emotional regulation training: an act with RAGE-Control case illustration. Clin Soc Work J 2012;40:75–84. 10.1007/s10615-011-0363-0
    1. Fernández-Aranda F, Jiménez-Murcia S, Santamaría JJ, et al. . Video games as a complementary therapy tool in mental disorders: PlayMancer, a European multicentre study. J Ment Health 2012;21:364–74. 10.3109/09638237.2012.664302
    1. Santamaria JJ, Antonio S, Fernando F-A, et al. . Serious games as additional psychological support: a review of the literature. J Cyber Ther Reh 2011;4:469–76.
    1. Fagundo AB, Santamaría JJ, Forcano L, et al. . Video game therapy for emotional regulation and impulsivity control in a series of treated cases with Bulimia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2013;21:493–9. 10.1002/erv.2259
    1. Giner-Bartolomé C, Fagundo AB, Sánchez I, et al. . Can an intervention based on a serious videogame prior to cognitive behavioral therapy be helpful in Bulimia nervosa? a clinical case study. Front Psychol 2015;6:982. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00982
    1. Schoenberg PLA, David AS. Biofeedback for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2014;39:109–35. 10.1007/s10484-014-9246-9
    1. Howard R, Schellhorn K, Lumsden J. A biofeedback intervention to control impulsiveness in a severely personality disordered forensic patient. Personal Ment Health 2013;7:168–73. 10.1002/pmh.1231
    1. Pawlow LA, O'Neil PM, Malcolm RJ. Night eating syndrome: effects of brief relaxation training on stress, mood, hunger, and eating patterns. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003;27:970–8. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802320
    1. Dana DA. The Polyvagal theory in therapy: engaging the rhythm of regulation (Norton series on interpersonal neurobiology). New York: WW Norton & Company, 2018.
    1. Lehrer PM. Heart rate variability biofeedback and other psychophysiological procedures as important elements in psychotherapy. Int J Psychophysiol 2018;131:89–95. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.09.012
    1. Tulip C, Fisher Z, Bankhead H, et al. . Building wellbeing in people with chronic conditions: a qualitative evaluation of an 8-week positive psychotherapy intervention for people living with an acquired brain injury. Front Psychol 2020;11:66. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00066
    1. Kemp AH, Koenig J, Thayer JF. From psychological moments to mortality: a multidisciplinary synthesis on heart rate variability spanning the continuum of time. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017;83:547–67. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.006
    1. Mead J, Wilkie L, Gibbs K, et al. . Rethinking wellbeing: toward a more ethical science of wellbeing that considers current and future generations, 2019. Available:
    1. Kemp A. Fisher, social ties, health and wellbeing: a literature review and model, in neuroscience and social science. Berlin: Springer, 2017: 397–427.
    1. Scholten H, Malmberg M, Lobel A, et al. . A randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of an immersive 3D video game for anxiety prevention among adolescents. PLoS One 2016;11:e0147763. 10.1371/journal.pone.0147763
    1. Colder Carras M, Van Rooij AJ, Spruijt-Metz D, et al. . Commercial video games as therapy: a new research agenda to unlock the potential of a global pastime. Front Psychiatry 2017;8:300. 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00300
    1. Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ, de Gortari ABO. Videogames as therapy: an updated selective review of the medical and psychological literature. JPHIM 2017;5:71–96.
    1. Zayeni D, Raynaud J-P, Revet A. Therapeutic and preventive use of video games in child and adolescent psychiatry: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry 2020;11:36. 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00036
    1. Sloan E, Hall K, Moulding R, et al. . Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic treatment construct across anxiety, depression, substance, eating and borderline personality disorders: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2017;57:141–63. 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.002
    1. Hayes S. Acceptance and commitment therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2009.
    1. Hayes Steven C, Kirk D. Acceptance and commitment therapy: the process and practice of mindful change. New York: Guilford Press, 2011.
    1. Dindo L, Van Liew JR, Arch JJ. Acceptance and commitment therapy: a transdiagnostic behavioral intervention for mental health and medical conditions. Neurotherapeutics 2017;14:546–53. 10.1007/s13311-017-0521-3
    1. Kashdan TB, Rottenberg J. Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clin Psychol Rev 2010;30:865–78. 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001
    1. Harris R. Act made simple: an easy-to-read primer on acceptance and commitment therapy. Oakland, California: New Harbinger Publications, 2009.
    1. Öst L-G. The efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Res Ther 2014;61:105–21. 10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.018
    1. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Bunting K, et al. . What is acceptance and commitment therapy?, in a practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy. Berlin: Springer, 2004: 3–29.
    1. Strosahl K, Wilson K. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press, 1999.
    1. Hayes SC. Get out of your mind and into your life: the new acceptance and commitment therapy. Oakland, California: New Harbinger Publications, 2005.
    1. Edwards DJ, Rainey E, Boukouvala V, et al. . Novel ACT-based eHealth psychoeducational intervention for students with mental distress: a study protocol for a mixed-methodology pilot trial. BMJ Open 2019;9:e029411. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029411
    1. Viskovich S, Pakenham KI. Pilot evaluation of a web-based acceptance and commitment therapy program to promote mental health skills in university students. J Clin Psychol 2018;74:2047–69. 10.1002/jclp.22656
    1. Levin ME, Haeger JA, Pierce BG, et al. . Web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for mental health problems in college students: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Modif 2017;41:141–62. 10.1177/0145445516659645
    1. Herbert MS, Afari N, Liu L, et al. . Telehealth versus in-person acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a randomized noninferiority trial. J Pain 2017;18:200–11. 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.10.014
    1. Bricker JB, Mull KE, Kientz JA, et al. . Randomized, controlled pilot trial of a smartphone APP for smoking cessation using acceptance and commitment therapy. Drug Alcohol Depend 2014;143: :87–94. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.006
    1. Levin ME, Haeger J, Pierce B, et al. . Evaluating an adjunctive mobile APP to enhance psychological flexibility in acceptance and commitment therapy. Behav Modif 2017;41:846–67. 10.1177/0145445517719661
    1. Johnson D, Jones C, Scholes L, et al. . Videogames and wellbeing: a comprehensive review. young and well cooperative research centre, Melbourne, 2013. Available:
    1. Vella K, Johnson D, Hides L. Positively playful: when videogames lead to player wellbeing. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications, 2013:99–102.
    1. Villani D, Carissoli C, Triberti S, et al. . Videogames for emotion regulation: a systematic review. Games Health J 2018;7:85–99. 10.1089/g4h.2017.0108
    1. Craig P. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: following considerable development in the field since 2006, MRC and NIHR have jointly commissioned an update of this guidance to be published in 2019, 2019. Available:
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a1655
    1. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. . Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:g1687. 10.1136/bmj.g1687
    1. Billingham SAM, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom clinical research network database. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:104. 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104
    1. Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, et al. . The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;5:63. 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
    1. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2005;44:227–39. 10.1348/014466505X29657
    1. Kok BE, Coffey KA, Cohn MA, et al. . How positive emotions build physical health: perceived positive social connections account for the upward spiral between positive emotions and vagal tone. Psychol Sci 2013;24:1123–32. 10.1177/0956797612470827
    1. Schrag A, Selai C, Jahanshahi M, et al. . The EQ-5D--a generic quality of life measure-is a useful instrument to measure quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:67–73. 10.1136/jnnp.69.1.67
    1. Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, et al. . Preliminary psychometric properties of the acceptance and action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther 2011;42:676–88. 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Saracutu M, Edwards DJ, Davies H, et al. . Protocol for a feasibility and acceptability study using a brief ACT-based intervention for people from Southwest Wales who live with persistent pain. BMJ Open 2018;8:e021866. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021866
    1. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods 2006;5:80–92. 10.1177/160940690600500107
    1. Morgan DL. Focus groups. Annu Rev Sociol 1996;22:129–52. 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren