Bosutinib Versus Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results From the Randomized BFORE Trial

Jorge E Cortes, Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini, Michael W Deininger, Michael J Mauro, Charles Chuah, Dong-Wook Kim, Irina Dyagil, Nataliia Glushko, Dragana Milojkovic, Philipp le Coutre, Valentin Garcia-Gutierrez, Laurence Reilly, Allison Jeynes-Ellis, Eric Leip, Nathalie Bardy-Bouxin, Andreas Hochhaus, Tim H Brümmendorf, Jorge E Cortes, Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini, Michael W Deininger, Michael J Mauro, Charles Chuah, Dong-Wook Kim, Irina Dyagil, Nataliia Glushko, Dragana Milojkovic, Philipp le Coutre, Valentin Garcia-Gutierrez, Laurence Reilly, Allison Jeynes-Ellis, Eric Leip, Nathalie Bardy-Bouxin, Andreas Hochhaus, Tim H Brümmendorf

Abstract

Purpose Bosutinib is a potent dual SRC/ABL kinase inhibitor approved for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant and /or intolerant to prior therapy. We assessed the efficacy and safety of bosutinib versus imatinib for first-line treatment of chronic-phase CML. Methods In this ongoing, multinational, phase III study, 536 patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 400 mg of bosutinib once daily (n = 268) or imatinib (n = 268). Per protocol, efficacy was assessed in patients who were Philadelphia chromosome-positive with typical (e13a2/e14a2) transcripts (bosutinib, n = 246; imatinib, n = 241). Patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative-/ BCR-ABL1-positive status and those with unknown Philadelphia chromosome status and/or atypical BCR-ABL1 transcript type were excluded from this population. Results The major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months (primary end point) was significantly higher with bosutinib versus imatinib (47.2% v 36.9%, respectively; P = .02), as was complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate by 12 months (77.2% v 66.4%, respectively; P = .0075). Cumulative incidence was favorable with bosutinib (MMR: hazard ratio, 1.34; P = .0173; CCyR: hazard ratio, 1.38; P < .001), with earlier response times. Four patients (1.6%) receiving bosutinib and six patients (2.5%) receiving imatinib experienced disease progression to accelerated/blast phase. Among treated patients, 22.0% of patients receiving bosutinib and 26.8% of patients receiving imatinib discontinued treatment, most commonly for drug-related toxicity (12.7% and 8.7%, respectively). Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea (7.8% v 0.8%) and increased ALT (19.0% v 1.5%) and AST (9.7% v 1.9%) levels were more common with bosutinib. Cardiac and vascular toxicities were uncommon. Conclusion Patients who received bosutinib had significantly higher rates of MMR and CCyR and achieved responses faster than those who received imatinib. Consistent with the known safety profile, GI events and transaminase elevations were more common with bosutinib. Results indicate bosutinib may be an effective first-line treatment for chronic-phase CML.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02130557.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Molecular response rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (modified intent-to-treat population). Major molecular response (MMR; defined as ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL1 transcripts on the international scale with ≥ 3,000 ABL1 assessed), MR4 (defined as ≤ 0.01% BCR-ABL1 transcripts on the international scale with ≥ 9,800 ABL1 assessed), and MR4.5 (defined as ≤ 0.0032% BCR-ABL1 transcripts on the international scale with ≥ 30,990 ABL1 assessed) were compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, stratified by Sokal risk group and geographic region. Two-sided P values from analyses other than the primary end point and 12-month secondary end points are for descriptive purposes only, without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Percentages are based on number of Philadelphia chromosome–positive patients with typical (e13a2 and/or e14a2) BCR-ABL1 transcript types (ie, modified intent-to-treat population) in each arm.

References

    1. Cortes JE, Saglio G, Kantarjian HM, et al. : Final 5-year study results of DASISION: The dasatinib versus imatinib study in treatment-naïve chronic myeloid leukemia patients trial. J Clin Oncol 34:2333-2340, 2016
    1. Hochhaus A, Saglio G, Hughes TP, et al. : Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial. Leukemia 30:1044-1054, 2016
    1. Hochhaus A, Larson RA, Guilhot F, et al. : Long-term outcomes of imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 376:917-927, 2017
    1. Gambacorti-Passerini C, Antolini L, Mahon FX, et al. : Multicenter independent assessment of outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:553-561, 2011
    1. Sasaki K, Strom SS, O’Brien S, et al. : Relative survival in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia in the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor era: Analysis of patient data from six prospective clinical trials. Lancet Haematol 2:e186-e193, 2015
    1. Bower H, Björkholm M, Dickman PW, et al. : Life expectancy of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia approaches the life expectancy of the general population. J Clin Oncol 34:2851-2857, 2016
    1. Cross NC, White HE, Colomer D, et al. : Laboratory recommendations for scoring deep molecular responses following treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 29:999-1003, 2015
    1. Redaelli S, Piazza R, Rostagno R, et al. : Activity of bosutinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib against 18 imatinib-resistant BCR/ABL mutants. J Clin Oncol 27:469-471, 2009
    1. Gambacorti-Passerini C, Brümmendorf TH, Kim DW, et al. : Bosutinib efficacy and safety in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib resistance or intolerance: Minimum 24-month follow-up. Am J Hematol 89:732-742, 2014
    1. Brümmendorf TH, Cortes JE, Khoury HJ, et al. : Factors influencing long-term efficacy and tolerability of bosutinib in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Br J Haematol 172:97-110, 2016
    1. Gambacorti-Passerini C, Kantarjian HM, Kim DW, et al. : Long-term efficacy and safety of bosutinib in patients with advanced leukemia following resistance/intolerance to imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Am J Hematol 90:755-768, 2015
    1. Cortes JE, Khoury HJ, Kantarjian HM, et al. : Long-term bosutinib for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of imatinib plus dasatinib and/or nilotinib. Am J Hematol 91:1206-1214, 2016
    1. Brümmendorf TH, Cortes JE, de Souza CA, et al. : Bosutinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia: Results from the 24-month follow-up of the BELA trial. Br J Haematol 168:69-81, 2015
    1. Cortes JE, Kim DW, Kantarjian HM, et al. : Bosutinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: Results from the BELA trial. J Clin Oncol 30:3486-3492, 2012
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: NCCN Evidence Blocks: chronic myelogenous leukemia version 2.2017.
    1. Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, et al. : European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013. Blood 122:872-884, 2013
    1. Cortes JE, Jean Khoury H, Kantarjian H, et al. : Long-term evaluation of cardiac and vascular toxicity in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias treated with bosutinib. Am J Hematol 91:606-616, 2016
    1. Hughes TP, Ross DM: Moving treatment-free remission into mainstream clinical practice in CML. Blood 128:17-23, 2016
    1. Saußele S, Richter J, Hochhaus A, et al. : The concept of treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 30:1638-1647, 2016
    1. Cortes JE, Kantarjian HM, Brümmendorf TH, et al. : Safety and efficacy of bosutinib (SKI-606) in chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients with resistance or intolerance to imatinib. Blood 118:4567-4576, 2011
    1. Data on file. Pfizer Inc, 2017

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren