One year follow-up after cryoballoon isolation of the pulmonary veins in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Yves Van Belle, Petter Janse, Dominic Theuns, Tamas Szili-Torok, Luc Jordaens, Yves Van Belle, Petter Janse, Dominic Theuns, Tamas Szili-Torok, Luc Jordaens

Abstract

Aims: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryoenergy delivered through a balloon is a new approach in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), but long-term follow-up is lacking. The aim of this study was to provide insight in the success rate and the incidence of recurrences.

Methods and results: Patients with symptomatic AF despite anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) were treated with cryoballoon PVI. Daily transtelephonic ECG monitoring, 24 h Holter-ECG, and an arrhythmia-focused questionnaire were used to document AF. One hundred and forty-one patients completed a follow-up of 457 +/- 252 days. Before ablation, Holter-ECG showed AF in 45%, including 16% continuous AF throughout the recording. Event recording revealed a median AF burden of 26%. The questionnaire showed a median of weekly AF complaints lasting for hours. All but one patient had successful PVI with a single procedure. After ablation, AF (defined as lasting for more than 30 s) was seen in 11% of Holter-ECGs, with 1% continuous AF. The event recording showed an AF burden of 9%. The median patient reported no more AF-related symptoms. Recurrence during the first 3 months was predictive for later recurrence. A second procedure was performed in 24 patients. The freedom of AF was 59% without AADs after 1,2 procedures. Four right phrenic nerve paralyses occurred, all resolving within 6 months. No PV stenoses were observed.

Conclusion: Pulmonary vein isolation with a cryothermal balloon is an effective treatment for paroxysmal AF, resulting in a clinical success rate comparable to studies involving radiofrequency ablation. Temporary right phrenic nerve paralysis is the most important complication.

Keywords: Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Cryoablation; Cryoballoon; Follow-up.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Atrial fibrillation (AF) burden as calculated from transtelephonic ECG recordings sorted ascendingly by the burden before pulmonary vein isolation (before) and burden sorted ascendingly after isolation (after). The area between both curves represents the reduction in AF burden for the entire group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Event-free survival curve for atrial fibrillation (AF) after a single ablation procedure. The two curves represent the same patient population. The upper curve (AF only after 3 months) represents the event-free survival after a 3-month blanking period; the second curve (All AF) represents the event-free survival without the 3-month blanking period. The patient numbers of both groups are represented at the bottom.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Event-free survival curve for atrial fibrillation (AF) after a single ablation procedure, employing 3-month blanking period. The upper curve (no early recurrence) is the patient population that did not have recurrence of AF during the blanking period. The lower curve (with early recurrence) represents the group that experienced recurrence of AF during the 3-month blanking period. Patient numbers of both groups are represented at the bottom.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Graphical representation of the overall 1-year clinical outcome after a mean of 1,2 procedures, presented as patient numbers. AF, recurrence of atrial fibrillation; AAD, anti-arrhythmic drugs.

References

    1. Calkins H, Brugada J, Packer DL, Cappato R, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4:816–61.
    1. Avitall B, Lafontaine D, Rozmus G, Adoni N, Dehnee A, Urbonas A, et al. Ablation of atrial-ventricular junction tissues via the coronary sinus using cryo balloon technology. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005;12:203–11.
    1. Avitall B, Lafontaine D, Rozmus G, Adoni N, Le KM, Dehnee A, et al. The safety and efficacy of multiple consecutive cryo lesions in canine pulmonary veins-left atrial junction. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1:203–9.
    1. Garan A, Al-Ahmad A, Mihalik T, Cartier C, Capuano L, Holtan D, et al. Cryoablation of the pulmonary veins using a novel balloon catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2006;15:79–81.
    1. Sarabanda AV, Bunch TJ, Johnson SB, Mahapatra S, Milton MA, Leite LR, et al. Efficacy and safety of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using a novel cryothermal balloon ablation system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1902–12.
    1. Van Belle Y, Janse P, Rivero-Ayerza MJ, Thornton AS, Jessurun ER, Theuns D, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using an occluding cryoballoon for circumferential ablation: feasibility, complications, and short-term outcome. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2231–7.
    1. Scholten MF, Thornton AS, Mekel JM, Jordaens LJ. Targets and endpoints in ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation in the light of pathophysiological mechanisms. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2006;15:27–33.
    1. Tse HF, Reek S, Timmermans C, Lee KL, Geller JC, Rodriguez LM, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using transvenous catheter cryoablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation without risk of pulmonary vein stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:752–8.
    1. Natale A, Pisano E, Shewchik J, Bash D, Fanelli R, Potenza D, et al. First human experience with pulmonary vein isolation using a through-the-balloon circumferential ultrasound ablation system for recurrent atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000;102:1879–82.
    1. Schmidt B, Antz M, Ernst S, Ouyang F, Falk P, Chun JK, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation by high-intensity focused ultrasound: first-in-man study with a steerable balloon catheter. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4:575–84.
    1. Sacher F, Monahan KH, Thomas SP, Davidson N, Adragao P, Sanders P, et al. Phrenic nerve injury after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: characterization and outcome in a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2498–503.
    1. Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, Davies W, Iesaka Y, Kalman J, et al. Worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005;111:1100–5.
    1. Moreira W, Manusama R, Timmermans C, Ghaye B, Philippens S, Wellens HJ, et al. Long-term follow-up after cryothermic ostial pulmonary vein isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:850–5.
    1. Klein G, Oswald H, Gardiwal A, Lusebrink U, Lissel C, Yu H, et al. Efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation by cryoballoon ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:802–6.
    1. Neumann T, Vogt J, Schumacher B, Dorszewski A, Kuniss M, Neuser H, et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with the cryoballoon technique results from a prospective 3-center study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:273–8.
    1. Callans DJ, Gerstenfeld EP, Dixit S, Zado E, Vanderhoff M, Ren JF, et al. Efficacy of repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedures in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15:1050–5.
    1. Nanthakumar K, Plumb VJ, Epstein AE, Veenhuyzen GD, Link D, Kay GN. Resumption of electrical conduction in previously isolated pulmonary veins: rationale for a different strategy? Circulation. 2004;109:1226–9.
    1. Verma A, Kilicaslan F, Pisano E, Marrouche NF, Fanelli R, Brachmann J, et al. Response of atrial fibrillation to pulmonary vein antrum isolation is directly related to resumption and delay of pulmonary vein conduction. Circulation. 2005;112:627–35.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren