The ANDROMEDA prospective cohort study: predictive value of combined criteria to tailor breast cancer screening and new opportunities from circulating markers: study protocol

Livia Giordano, Federica Gallo, Elisabetta Petracci, Giovanna Chiorino, Nereo Segnan, Andromeda working group, Caterina Anatrone, Franca Artuso, Marcella Beraudi, Denise Casella, Matilde Ceresa, Francesca Di Stefano, Marta Dotti, Simona Feira, Alfonso Frigerio, Francesca Garena, Pamela Giubilato, Maria Piera Mano, Vincenzo Marra, Andrea Menardi, Andrea Ortale, Stefania Pelosin, Andrea Pezzana, Sabina Pitarella, Antonio Ponti, Francesca Saba, Viviana Vergini, Piera Vicari, Salad Heddine Ayoubi, Alessandra Debianchi, Elisabetta Favettini, Ilaria Gregnanin, Lorella Iacazio, Maurizia Mello-Grand, Paola Ostano, Pietro Presti, Livia Giordano, Federica Gallo, Elisabetta Petracci, Giovanna Chiorino, Nereo Segnan, Andromeda working group, Caterina Anatrone, Franca Artuso, Marcella Beraudi, Denise Casella, Matilde Ceresa, Francesca Di Stefano, Marta Dotti, Simona Feira, Alfonso Frigerio, Francesca Garena, Pamela Giubilato, Maria Piera Mano, Vincenzo Marra, Andrea Menardi, Andrea Ortale, Stefania Pelosin, Andrea Pezzana, Sabina Pitarella, Antonio Ponti, Francesca Saba, Viviana Vergini, Piera Vicari, Salad Heddine Ayoubi, Alessandra Debianchi, Elisabetta Favettini, Ilaria Gregnanin, Lorella Iacazio, Maurizia Mello-Grand, Paola Ostano, Pietro Presti

Abstract

Background: In recent years growing interest has been posed on alternative ways to screen women for breast cancer involving different imaging techniques or adjusting screening interval by breast cancer risk estimates. A new research area is studying circulating microRNAs as molecular biomarkers potentially useful for non invasive early detection together with the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The Andromeda study is a prospective cohort study on women attending breast cancer screening in a northern Italian area. The aims of the study are: 1) to define appropriate women risk-based stratifications for personalized screening considering different factors (reproductive, family and biopsy history, breast density, lifestyle habits); 2) to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of selected circulating microRNAs in a case-control study nested within the above mentioned cohort.

Methods: About 21,000 women aged 46-67 years compliant to screening mammography are expected to be enrolled. At enrolment, information on well-known breast cancer risk factors and life-styles habits are collected through self-admistered questionnaires. Information on breast density and anthropometric measurements (height, weight, body composition, and waist circumference) are recorded. In addition, women are requested to provide a blood sample for serum, plasma and buffy-coat storing for subsequent molecular analyses within the nested case-control study. This investigation will be performed on approximately 233 cases (screen-detected) and 699 matched controls to evaluate SNPs and circulating microRNAs. The whole study will last three years and the cohort will be followed up for ten years to observe the onset of new breast cancer cases.

Discussion: Nowadays women undergo the same screening protocol, independently of their breast density and their individual risk to develop breast cancer. New criteria to better stratify women in risk groups could enable the screening strategies to target high-risk women while reducing interventions in those at low-risk. In this frame the present study will contribute in identifying the feasibility and impact of implementing personalized breast cancer screening.

Trial registration: NCT02618538 (retrospectively registered on 27-11-2015.).

Keywords: Breast cancer; Risk prediction models; Tailored screening.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study will be conducted in accordance with the principle of the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of each participating center (Ethical and deontological institutional review board of the A.O.U Città della Salute e della Scienza of Turin and Ethical Committee of Novara). The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with the number NCT02618538, on 27 November 2015.

All participants are requested to sign an informed consent after receiving complete and clear information regarding the nature and purpose of the study. Modifications or amendments that have an impact on the conduct of the study will be documented, resubmitted for the approval to the ethic committees, and reported in further publications. To ensure data privacy, the confidentiality standards are assured by coding each women enrolled in the study through assignment of a unique code identification number. Participants’ information are being stored in locked electronic archives with limited access in all screening sites. Digital files are kept in password-protected applications and folders. Participants’ information will not be released outside the study without the written permission of the participant.

Results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, as soon as available. According to the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors only persons directly involved in the study will be designated as authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Andromeda Study

References

    1. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research . Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington DC: AICR; 2007.
    1. I numeri del cancro in Italia. 2016. . Assessed 22 May 2017.
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer . IARC handbooks of cancer prevention: breast cancer screening. Lyon: IARC Press; 2016.
    1. Ventura L, Giorgi D, Giordano L, Frigerio A, Mantellini P, Zappa M. Italian breast screening survey group. Mammographic breast cancer screening in Italy: 2011-2012 survey. Epidemiol Prev. 2015;39(3 Suppl 1):21–29.
    1. Gøtzsche P, Olsen O. Is screening with mammography for breast cancer justifiable? Lancet. 2000;355:129–134. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06065-1.
    1. Baum M. Harms of breast cancer screening outweigh benefits if deaths caused by treatment are included. BMJ. 2013:346–f385.
    1. EUROSCREEN Working Group Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of benefit and harm balance sheet. J Med Screen. 2012;19(Suppl 1):5–13.
    1. Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, Berry DA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G, et al. Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:738–747. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00010.
    1. Eccles SA, Aboagye EO, Ali S, Anderson AS, Armes J, Berditchevski F, et al. Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(5):R92. doi: 10.1186/bcr3493.
    1. van Ravesteyn NT, Miglioretti DL, Stout NK, Lee SJ, Schechter CB, Buist DS, et al. Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:609–617. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00002.
    1. Schousboe JT, Kerlikowske K, Loh A, Cummings SR. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and costeffectiveness. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:10–20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00003.
    1. Pashayan N, Duffy SW, Chowdhury S, Dent T, Burton H, Neal DE, et al. Polygenic susceptibility to prostate and breast cancer: implications for personalised screening. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:1656–1663. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.118.
    1. Vilaprinyo E, Forné C, Carles M, Sala M, Pla R, Castells X, et al. Cost-effectiveness and harm-effectiveness analyses of risk-based screening strategies for breast cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e86858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086858.
    1. Maas P, Barrdahl M, Joshi AD, Auer PL, Gaudet MM, Milne RL, et al. Breast cancer risk from modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors among white women in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(10):1295–1302. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1025.
    1. Darabi H, Czene K, Zhao W, Liu J, Hall P, Humphreys K. Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(1):R25. doi: 10.1186/bcr3110.
    1. Turnbull C, Ahmed S, Morrison J, Pernet D, Renwick A, Maranian M, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five new breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nat Genet. 2010;42(6):504–507. doi: 10.1038/ng.586.
    1. Michailidou K, Hall P, Gonzalez-Neira A, Ghoussaini M, Dennis J, Milne RL, et al. Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2013;45:353–361. doi: 10.1038/ng.2563.
    1. Mavaddat N, Pharoah PD, Michailidou K, Tyrer J, Brook MN, Bolla MK, et al. Prediction of breast cancer risk based on profiling with common genetic variants. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(5).
    1. Guttery DS, Blighe K, Page K, Marchese SD, Hills A, Coombes RC, et al. Hide and seek: tell-tale signs of breast cancer lurking in the blood. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013;32(1–2):289–302. doi: 10.1007/s10555-012-9414-4.
    1. Ng EK, Li R, Shin VY, Jin HC, Leung CP, Ma ES, et al. Circulating microRNAs as specific biomarkers for breast cancer detection. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053141.
    1. Godfrey AC, Xu Z, Weinberg CR, Getts RC, Wade PA, Deroo LA, et al. Serum microRNA expression as an early marker for breast cancer risk in prospectively collected samples from the sister study cohort. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(3):R42. doi: 10.1186/bcr3428.
    1. Wu Q, Wang C, Lu Z, Guo L, Ge Q. Analysis of serum genome-wide microRNAs for breast cancer detection. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413(13–14):1058–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.02.016.
    1. Hu Z, Dong J, Wang LE, Ma H, Liu J, Zhao Y, et al. Serum microRNA profiling and breast cancer risk: the use of miR-484/191 as endogenous controls. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(4):828–834. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs030.
    1. Caumo F, Bernardi D, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, et al. Incremental effect from integrating 3Dmammography (tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography: increased breast cancer detection evident for screening centres in a population-based trial. Breast. 2014;23(1):76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.11.006.
    1. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. . Assessed 9 Nov 2017.
    1. Brief COPE. . Assessed 9 Nov 2017.
    1. Morra L, Sacchetto D, Durando M, Agliozzo S, Carbonaro LA, Delsanto S, et al. Breast cancer: computer-aided detection with digital breast Tomosynthesis. Radiology. 2015;277(1):56–63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015141959.
    1. Liberman L, Menell JH. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) Radiol Clin N Am. 2002;40(3):409–430. doi: 10.1016/S0033-8389(01)00017-3.
    1. Pepe MS, Feng Z, Janes H, Bossuyt PM, Potter JD. Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1432–1438. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn326.
    1. Hu J, Wang Z, Liao BY, Yu L, Gao X, Lu S, et al. Human miR-1228 as a stable endogenous control for the quantification of circulating microRNAs in cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(5):1187–1194. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28757.
    1. Hamam R, Ali AM, Alsaleh KA, Kassem M, Alfayez M, Aldahmash A, et al. microRNA expression profiling on individual breast cancer patients identifies novel panel of circulating microRNA for early detection. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25997. doi: 10.1038/srep25997.
    1. Petracci E, Decarli A, Schairer C, Pfeiffer RM, Pee D, Masala G, et al. Risk factor modification and projections of absolute breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1037–1048. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr172.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren