Variants of WNT7A and GPR124 are associated with hemorrhagic transformation following intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke

Song Ta, Xianfang Rong, Zhen-Ni Guo, Hang Jin, Peng Zhang, Fenge Li, Zhihuan Li, Lilong Lin, Chenqing Zheng, Qingquan Gu, Yuan Zhang, Wenlan Liu, Yi Yang, Junlei Chang, Song Ta, Xianfang Rong, Zhen-Ni Guo, Hang Jin, Peng Zhang, Fenge Li, Zhihuan Li, Lilong Lin, Chenqing Zheng, Qingquan Gu, Yuan Zhang, Wenlan Liu, Yi Yang, Junlei Chang

Abstract

Aims: The canonical Wnt signaling pathway plays an essential role in blood-brain barrier integrity and intracerebral hemorrhage in preclinical stroke models. Here, we sought to explore the association between canonical Wnt signaling and hemorrhagic transformation (HT) following intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients as well as to determine the underlying cellular mechanisms.

Methods: 355 consecutive AIS patients receiving IVT were included. Blood samples were collected on admission, and HT was detected at 24 hours after IVT. 117 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of 28 Wnt signaling genes and exon sequences of 4 core cerebrovascular Wnt signaling components (GPR124, RECK, FZD4, and CTNNB1) were determined using a customized sequencing chip. The impact of identified genetic variants was further studied in HEK 293T cells using cellular and biochemical assays.

Results: During the study period, 80 patients experienced HT with 27 parenchymal hematoma (PH). Compared to the non-PH patients, WNT7A SNPs (rs2163910, P = .001, OR 2.727; rs1124480, P = .002, OR 2.404) and GPR124 SNPs (rs61738775, P = .012, OR 4.883; rs146016051, P < .001, OR 7.607; rs75336000, P = .044, OR 2.503) were selectively enriched in the PH patients. Interestingly, a missense variant of GPR124 (rs75336000, c.3587G>A) identified in the PH patients resulted in a single amino acid alteration (p.Cys1196Tyr) in the intracellular domain of GPR124. This variant substantially reduced the activity of WNT7B-induced canonical Wnt signaling by decreasing the ability of GPR124 to recruit cytoplasmic DVL1 to the cellular membrane.

Conclusion: Variants of WNT7A and GPR124 are associated with increased risk of PH in patients with AIS after intravenous thrombolysis, likely through regulating the activity of canonical Wnt signaling.

Keywords: blood-brain barrier; intracerebral hemorrhage; ischemic stroke; signaling pathway; single-nucleotide polymorphism.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

© 2020 The Authors. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the study design. A, Schematic illustration of the canonical Wnt signaling in brain endothelium. B, Summary of Wnt signaling‐related genes assessed in this study. Either both exon sequence variations and known SNPs (left column) or only known SNPs (right column) were determined and analyzed
Figure 2
Figure 2
Shift distribution of patient numbers by GPR124 c.3587G>A mutation or by the top five Wnt signaling genetic variants. Number of patients (%) in each group with GPR124 c.3587G>A mutation (A) or with alleles of the top five Wnt signaling genetic variants enriched in the PH patients (WNT7A rs2163910 and rs1124480, GPR124 rs61738775, rs146016051, and rs75336000; 2 alleles/variant, 10 alleles totally) (B) was calculated
Figure 3
Figure 3
The GPR124 C1196Y mutation reduces Wnt signaling activity. A, Schematic illustration of the C1196Y alteration in the intracellular domain (ICD) of GPR124. B, Wild‐type (WT) GPR124 and GPR124 C1196Y were cloned into pcDNA3.1‐3xFLAG construct and overexpressed in HEK 293T cells. Protein subcellular location was determined by confocal immunofluorescence staining. C, Expression levels of GPR124 WT, GPR124 C1196Y, and GPR124 with ICD deletion (GPR124 △ICD) were determined by Western blotting. D‐E, Wnt signaling activity was measured by AXIN2 qRT‐PCR (D) and β‐catenin‐dependent transcription assay TOP‐Flash (E) after transfecting HEK 293T cells with the indicated plasmids. Data are presented as mean ± SE. *< .05, **< .01. NS, not significant, Student's t test
Figure 4
Figure 4
The GPR124 C1196Y mutation decreases the interaction between DVL1 and GPR124. A, 3xFLAG‐GPR124 WT or 3xFLAG‐GPR124 C1196Y was co‐expressed with DVL1‐His in HEK 293T cells. GPR124 was precipitated with anti‐FLAG antibody, and DVL1 protein bound to GPR124 was detected with anti‐6xHis antibody. This experiment was repeated three times and quantified in (B). Data are presented as mean ± SE. ***< .01, Student's t test. C, Interaction between GPR124 (WT or C1196Y) and DVL1 was determined by co‐immunofluorescence staining (co‐IF) in HEK 293T cells. D‐F, A series of truncated DVL1 mutants were constructed, and co‐IP was performed to map the binding sites of DVL1 with GPR124 protein. Experiments were repeated three times, and representative results were presented. G, Proposed working model

References

    1. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics‐2017 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146‐e603.
    1. Wu S, Wu BO, Liu M, et al. Stroke in china: advances and challenges in epidemiology, prevention, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(4):394‐405.
    1. National Institute of Neurological D, Stroke rt PASSG . Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581‐1587.
    1. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317‐1329.
    1. Zhou Z, Lu J, Liu WW, et al. Advances in stroke pharmacology. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;19123‐19142.
    1. Rocha M, Jadhav AP, Jovin TG. Endovascular therapy for large vessel occlusion stroke: An update on the most recent clinical trials. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019;39(9):1661‐1663.
    1. Jickling GC, Liu DaZhi, Stamova B, et al. Hemorrhagic transformation after ischemic stroke in animals and humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34(2):185‐199.
    1. Khatri P, Wechsler LR, Broderick JP. Intracranial hemorrhage associated with revascularization therapies. Stroke. 2007;38(2):431‐440.
    1. Shi L, Rocha M, Leak RK, et al. A new era for stroke therapy: Integrating neurovascular protection with optimal reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018271678X18798162. 2018;38(12):2073–2091.
    1. Pang J, Zhang JH, Jiang Y. Delayed recanalization in acute ischemic stroke patients: Late is better than never? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019;39(12):2536‐2538.
    1. Fiorelli M, Bastianello S, von Kummer R, et al. Hemorrhagic transformation within 36 hours of a cerebral infarct: relationships with early clinical deterioration and 3‐month outcome in the European cooperative acute stroke study i (ecass i) cohort. Stroke. 1999;30(11):2280‐2284.
    1. Zhao Z, Nelson AR, Betsholtz C, Zlokovic BV. Establishment and dysfunction of the blood‐brain barrier. Cell. 2015;163(5):1064‐1078.
    1. Liebner S, Dijkhuizen RM, Reiss Y, et al. Functional morphology of the blood‐brain barrier in health and disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;135(3):311‐336.
    1. Zheng Z, Chopp M, Chen J. Multifaceted roles of pericytes in central nervous system homeostasis and disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020;40(7):1381‐1401.
    1. Yao Y. Basement membrane and stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019;39(1):3‐19.
    1. Chow BW, Gu C. The molecular constituents of the blood‐brain barrier. Trends Neurosci. 2015;38(10):598‐608.
    1. Desilles J‐P, Rouchaud A, Labreuche J, et al. Blood‐brain barrier disruption is associated with increased mortality after endovascular therapy. Neurology. 2013;80(9):844‐851.
    1. Yepes M, Sandkvist M, Moore EG, et al. Tissue‐type plasminogen activator induces opening of the blood‐brain barrier via the ldl receptor‐related protein. J Clin Invest. 2003;112(10):1533‐1540.
    1. Latour LL, Kang DW, Ezzeddine MA, Chalela JA, Warach S. Early blood‐brain barrier disruption in human focal brain ischemia. Ann Neurol. 2004;56(4):468‐477.
    1. Warach S, Latour LL. Evidence of reperfusion injury, exacerbated by thrombolytic therapy, in human focal brain ischemia using a novel imaging marker of early blood‐brain barrier disruption. Stroke. 2004;35(11 Suppl 1):2659‐2661.
    1. Chang J, Mancuso MR, Maier C, et al. Gpr124 is essential for blood‐brain barrier integrity in central nervous system disease. Nat Med. 2017;23(4):450‐460.
    1. Sandoval KE, Witt KA. Blood‐brain barrier tight junction permeability and ischemic stroke. Neurobiol Dis. 2008;32(2):200‐219.
    1. Suzuki Y, Nagai N, Umemura K. A review of the mechanisms of blood‐brain barrier permeability by tissue‐type plasminogen activator treatment for cerebral ischemia. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;102.
    1. Savitz SI, Baron JC, Yenari MA, Sanossian N, Fisher M. Reconsidering neuroprotection in the reperfusion era. Stroke. 2017;48(12):3413‐3419.
    1. Filchenko I, Blochet C, Buscemi L, et al. Caveolin‐1 regulates perivascular aquaporin‐4 expression after cerebral ischemia. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8371.
    1. Shen J, Xu G, Zhu R, et al. Pdgfr‐beta restores blood‐brain barrier functions in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019;39(8):1501‐1515.
    1. Cheng T, Petraglia AL, Li Z, et al. Activated protein c inhibits tissue plasminogen activator‐induced brain hemorrhage. Nat Med. 2006;12(11):1278‐1285.
    1. Su EJ, Fredriksson L, Geyer M, et al. Activation of pdgf‐cc by tissue plasminogen activator impairs blood‐brain barrier integrity during ischemic stroke. Nat Med. 2008;14(7):731‐737.
    1. Cuadrado E, Ortega L, Hernández‐Guillamon M, et al. Tissue plasminogen activator (t‐pa) promotes neutrophil degranulation and mmp‐9 release. J Leukoc Biol. 2008;84(1):207‐214.
    1. Stenman JM, Rajagopal J, Carroll TJ, et al. Canonical wnt signaling regulates organ‐specific assembly and differentiation of cns vasculature. Science. 2008;322(5905):1247‐1250.
    1. Wang Y, Rattner A, Zhou Y, et al. Norrin/frizzled4 signaling in retinal vascular development and blood brain barrier plasticity. Cell. 2012;151(6):1332‐1344.
    1. Wang Y, Cho C, Williams J, et al. Interplay of the norrin and wnt7a/wnt7b signaling systems in blood‐brain barrier and blood‐retina barrier development and maintenance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(50):E11827‐E11836.
    1. Daneman R, Agalliu D, Zhou L, et al. Wnt/beta‐catenin signaling is required for cns, but not non‐cns, angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(2):641‐646.
    1. Kuhnert F, Mancuso MR, Shamloo A, et al. Essential regulation of cns angiogenesis by the orphan g protein‐coupled receptor gpr124. Science. 2010;330(6006):985‐989.
    1. Cullen M, Elzarrad MK, Seaman S, et al. Gpr124, an orphan g protein‐coupled receptor, is required for cns‐specific vascularization and establishment of the blood‐brain barrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(14):5759‐5764.
    1. Anderson KD, Pan L, Yang X‐M, et al. Angiogenic sprouting into neural tissue requires gpr124, an orphan g protein‐coupled receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(7):2807‐2812.
    1. Zhou Y, Nathans J. Gpr124 controls cns angiogenesis and blood‐brain barrier integrity by promoting ligand‐specific canonical wnt signaling. Dev Cell. 2014;31(2):248‐256.
    1. Posokhova E, Shukla A, Seaman S, et al. Gpr124 functions as a wnt7‐specific coactivator of canonical beta‐catenin signaling. Cell Rep. 2015;10(2):123‐130.
    1. Zhou Y, Wang Y, Tischfield M, et al. Canonical wnt signaling components in vascular development and barrier formation. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(9):3825‐3846.
    1. Vanhollebeke B, Stone OA, Bostaille N, et al. Tip cell‐specific requirement for an atypical gpr124‐ and reck‐dependent wnt/beta‐catenin pathway during brain angiogenesis. Elife. 2015;4:e06489.
    1. Cho C, Smallwood PM, Nathans J. Reck and gpr124 are essential receptor cofactors for wnt7a/wnt7b‐specific signaling in mammalian cns angiogenesis and blood‐brain barrier regulation. Neuron. 2017;95(5):1056‐1073e1055.
    1. Tran KA, Zhang X, Predescu D, et al. Endothelial beta‐catenin signaling is required for maintaining adult blood‐brain barrier integrity and central nervous system homeostasis. Circulation. 2016;133(2):177‐186.
    1. Liebner S, Corada M, Bangsow T, et al. Wnt/beta‐catenin signaling controls development of the blood‐brain barrier. J Cell Biol. 2008;183(3):409‐417.
    1. Wang T, Duan YM, Fu Q, et al. Im‐12 activates the wnt‐beta‐catenin signaling pathway and attenuates rtpa‐induced hemorrhagic transformation in rats after acute ischemic stroke. Biochem Cell Biol. 2019;97(6):702‐708.
    1. Jean LeBlanc N, Menet R, Picard K, et al. Canonical wnt pathway maintains blood‐brain barrier integrity upon ischemic stroke and its activation ameliorates tissue plasminogen activator therapy. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(9):6521‐6538.
    1. Wang W, Li M, Wang Y, et al. Gsk‐3beta inhibitor tws119 attenuates rtpa‐induced hemorrhagic transformation and activates the wnt/beta‐catenin signaling pathway after acute ischemic stroke in rats. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53(10):7028‐7036.
    1. Eubelen M, Bostaille N, Cabochette P, et al. A molecular mechanism for wnt ligand‐specific signaling. Science. 2018;361(6403):1‐13.
    1. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large‐vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta‐analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1723‐1731.
    1. Anfray A, Drieu A, Hingot V, et al. Circulating tpa contributes to neurovascular coupling by a mechanism involving the endothelial nmda receptors. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019. 10.1177/0271678X19883599
    1. Reis M, Czupalla CJ, Ziegler N, et al. Endothelial wnt/beta‐catenin signaling inhibits glioma angiogenesis and normalizes tumor blood vessels by inducing pdgf‐b expression. J Exp Med. 2012;209(9):1611‐1627.
    1. Vallon M, Yuki K, Nguyen TD, et al. A reck‐wnt7 receptor‐ligand interaction enables isoform‐specific regulation of wnt bioavailability. Cell Rep. 2018;25(2):339‐349 e339.
    1. Mayr C. What are 3' utrs doing? Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019;11(10).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren