Step Number and Aerobic Minute Exercise Prescription and Progression in Stroke: A Roadmap
Sue Peters, Tara Klassen, Amy Schneeberg, Sean Dukelow, Mark Bayley, Michael Hill, Sepideh Pooyania, Jennifer Yao, Janice Eng, Sue Peters, Tara Klassen, Amy Schneeberg, Sean Dukelow, Mark Bayley, Michael Hill, Sepideh Pooyania, Jennifer Yao, Janice Eng
Abstract
Background: While higher therapeutic intensity improves motor recovery after stroke, translating findings from successful studies is challenging without clear exercise intensity targets. We show in the DOSE trial1 more than double the steps and aerobic minutes within a session can be achieved compared with usual care and translates to improved long-term walking outcomes.
Objective: We modeled data from this successful higher intensity multi-site RCT to develop targets for prescribing and progressing exercise for varying levels of walking impairment after stroke.
Methods: In twenty-five individuals in inpatient rehabilitation, twenty sessions were monitored for a total of 500 one-hour physical therapy sessions. For the 500 sessions, step number and aerobic minute progression were modeled using linear mixed effects regression. Using formulas from the linear mixed effects regression, targets were calculated.
Results: The model for step number included session number and baseline walking speed, and for aerobic minutes, session number and age. For steps, there was an increase of 73 steps per session. With baseline walking speed, for every 0.1 m/s increase, a corresponding increase of 302 steps was predicted. For aerobic minutes, there was an increase of .56 minutes of aerobic activity (ie, 34 seconds) per session. For every year increase in age, a decrease of .39 minutes (ie, 23 seconds) was predicted.
Conclusions: Using data associated with better walking outcomes, we provide step number and aerobic minute targets that future studies can cross-validate. As walking speed and age are collected at admission, these models allow for uptake of routine measurement of therapeutic intensity.Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01915368.
Keywords: Rehabilitation; exercise; gait; outcomes; stroke.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
- Klassen TD, Dukelow SP, Bayley MT, Benavente O, Hill MD, Krassioukov A, et al. Higher doses improve walking recovery during stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Stroke. 2020. Sep;51(9):2639-2648.
- Billinger SA, Boyne P, Coughenour E, Dunning K, Mattlage A. Does aerobic exercise and the FITT principle fit into stroke recovery? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2015;15(2):519.
- Sun J, Ke Z, Yip SP, Hu XL, Zheng XX, Tong KY. Gradually increased training intensity benefits rehabilitation outcome after stroke by BDNF upregulation and stress suppression. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:925762.
- Prout EC, Mansfield A, McIlroy WE, Brooks D. Physiotherapists' perspectives on aerobic exercise early after stroke: A preliminary study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016. Aug;32(6):452-460.
- Marzolini S, Robertson AD, Oh P, Goodman JM, Corbett D, Du X, et al. Aerobic Training and Mobilization Early Post-stroke: Cautions and Considerations. Front Neurol. 2019;10:1187.
- Klassen TD, Dukelow SP, Bayley MT, Benavente O, Hill MD, Krassioukov A, et al. Determining optimal poststroke exercise: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating therapeutic intensity and dose on functional recovery during stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Int J Stroke. 2019. Jan;14(1):80-86.
- Klassen TD, Semrau JA, Dukelow SP, Bayley MT, Hill MD, Eng JJ. Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitor as a Practical Way to Measure Walking Intensity During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation. Stroke. 2017. Sep;48(9):2614-2617.
- Stahl SE, An H-S, Dinkel DM, Noble JM, Lee JM. How accurate are the wrist-based heart rate monitors during walking and running activities? Are they accurate enough? BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 2016;2(1):e000106.
- Mercer VS, Freburger JK, Yin Z, Preisser JS. Recovery of paretic lower extremity loading ability and physical function in the first six months after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014. Aug;95(8):1547-1555.
- Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S, Lai SM, Richards L, Perera S, et al. Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful. Stroke. 2007. Jul;38(7):2096-2100.
- Scrivener K, Sherrington C, Schurr K. Exercise dose and mobility outcome in a comprehensive stroke unit: description and prediction from a prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2012. Oct;44(10):824-829.
- Abe T, Kitamura A, Taniguchi Y, Amano H, Seino S, Yokoyama Y, et al. Pathway from gait speed to incidence of disability and mortality in older adults: A mediating role of physical activity. Maturitas. 2019. May;123:32-36.
- Shimizu N, Hashidate H, Ota T, Suzuki T, Yatsunami M. Characteristics of intensity-based physical activity according to gait ability in people hospitalized with subacute stroke: a cross-sectional study. Physical Therapy Research. 2019;22(1):17-25.
- Taylor-Piliae RE, Latt LD, Hepworth JT, Coull BM. Predictors of gait velocity among community-dwelling stroke survivors. Gait Posture. 2012. Mar;35(3):395-399.
Source: PubMed