WHO global rotavirus surveillance network: a strategic review of the first 5 years, 2008-2012

Mary M Agócs, Fatima Serhan, Catherine Yen, Jason M Mwenda, Lúcia H de Oliveira, Nadia Teleb, Annemarie Wasley, Pushpa R Wijesinghe, Kimberley Fox, Jacqueline E Tate, Jon R Gentsch, Umesh D Parashar, Gagandeep Kang, Department of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Mary M Agócs, Fatima Serhan, Catherine Yen, Jason M Mwenda, Lúcia H de Oliveira, Nadia Teleb, Annemarie Wasley, Pushpa R Wijesinghe, Kimberley Fox, Jacqueline E Tate, Jon R Gentsch, Umesh D Parashar, Gagandeep Kang, Department of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

Abstract

Since 2008, the World Health Organization (WHO) has coordinated the Global Rotavirus Surveillance Network, a network of sentinel surveillance hospitals and laboratories that report to ministries of health (MoHs) and WHO clinical features and rotavirus testing data for children aged <5 years hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis. In 2013, WHO conducted a strategic review to assess surveillance network performance, provide recommendations for strengthening the network, and assess the network's utility as a platform for other vaccine-preventable disease surveillance. The strategic review team determined that during 2011 and 2012, a total of 79 sites in 37 countries met reporting and testing inclusion criteria for data analysis. Of the 37 countries with sites meeting inclusion criteria, 13 (35%) had introduced rotavirus vaccine nationwide. All 79 sites included in the analysis were meeting 2008 network objectives of documenting presence of disease and describing disease epidemiology, and all countries were using the rotavirus surveillance data for vaccine introduction decisions, disease burden estimates, and advocacy; countries were in the process of assessing the use of this surveillance platform for other vaccine-preventable diseases. However, the review also indicated that the network would benefit from enhanced management, standardized data formats, linkage of clinical data with laboratory data, and additional resources to support network functions. In November 2013, WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) endorsed the findings and recommendations made by the review team and noted potential opportunities for using the network as a platform for other vaccine-preventable disease surveillance. WHO will work to implement the recommendations to improve the network's functions and to provide higher quality surveillance data for use in decisions related to vaccine introduction and vaccination program sustainability.

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
Reporting countries and countries with sentinel sites meeting inclusion criteria — World Health Organization, Global Rotavirus Surveillance Network, 2011–2012

References

    1. World Health Organization. Rotavirus vaccines. WHO position paper—January 2013. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2013;88:49–64.
    1. World Health Organization. Rotavirus vaccines: an update. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2009;84:533–40.
    1. International Vaccine Access Center. VIMS report: global vaccine introduction. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, International Vaccine Access Center; 2014. Available at .
    1. PATH. Rotavirus vaccine introductions: worldwide. Seattle, WA: PATH; 2014. Available at .
    1. World Health Organization. Principles and considerations for adding a vaccine to a national immunization programme: from decision to implementation and monitoring. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014. Available at .
    1. World Health Organization. Global vaccine action plan 2011–2020. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013. Available at .
    1. World Health Organization. Meeting of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on immunization, November 2013—conclusions and recommendations. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2014;89:1–20.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren