Treatment with exenatide once weekly or twice daily for 30 weeks is associated with changes in several cardiovascular risk markers

Elaine Chiquette, Peter P Toth, Gilbert Ramirez, Michael Cobble, Robert Chilton, Elaine Chiquette, Peter P Toth, Gilbert Ramirez, Michael Cobble, Robert Chilton

Abstract

Background: Cyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes are two of the most significant risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease. Measurement of lipoprotein subclasses provides important information about derangements in lipid metabolism and helps refine cardiovascular risk assessment. Exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, improved glycemic control, obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes in clinical trials.

Methods: In the DURATION-1 trial, patients with type 2 diabetes were treated with exenatide once weekly or twice daily for 30 weeks. This post hoc analysis evaluated the impact of exenatide on lipoprotein subclasses in 211 DURATION-1 patients using vertical auto profile methodology and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences general linear model adjusted for glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and weight.

Results: Baseline lipids and high sensitivity C-reactive protein were normal overall based on the standard lipid panel. Once-weekly exenatide reduced apolipoprotein B and the apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A1 ratio (P < 0.05), independent of glycemic improvement and weight loss. A significant shift in lipoprotein pattern away from small, dense low-density lipoprotein-4 cholesterol was also observed (P < 0.05). Exenatide once weekly increased high-density lipoprotein-2 cholesterol, even after adjustment for changes in HbA(1c) and weight (P < 0.05). Triglycerides, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high sensitivity C-reactive protein were reduced with both the once-weekly and twice-daily exenatide regimens (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: In this post hoc analysis, exenatide significantly improved a number of cardiovascular risk markers. Continuous exenatide exposure with exenatide once weekly elicited a greater response than did immediate-release exenatide twice daily, generally independent of glycemic improvement and weight loss. Thus, in addition to improving glycemic control, exenatide induced favorable changes in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism and decreased systemic inflammation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00308139.

Keywords: dyslipidemia; glucagon-like protein-1 receptor agonist; incretin mimetic; type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of exenatide on glycosylated hemoglobin, body weight, apolipoproteins, and lipoproteins in the total analysis cohort with an overall normal lipid profile at baseline. Week 30 change data are independent of glycemic improvement and weight loss. (A) Glycosylated hemoglobin. (B) Body weight. (C) Apolipoprotein B. (D) Percentage of apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1. (E) Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and its subclasses. (F) Triglycerides, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. (G) High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and its subclasses. (H) Percentage changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and its subclasses. (Panels A and B) Least squares mean + 95% confidence intervals. *Change from baseline P < 0.0001. (PanelsCG) Adjusted mean + standard error of the mean. Notes: *Week 30 change from baseline P< 0.05. Once weekly, n = 106, twice daily, n = 105. Abbreviations: A1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; ApoA1, apolipoprotein A1; BID, twice daily; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL-C, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; QW, once weekly.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of exenatide on apolipoproteins, lipoproteins, and high sensitivity C-reactive protein in the subgroup of patients with abnormal lipid values– at baseline. (A) Apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, and the ratio of these apolipoproteins; once weekly, n = 85, n = 9, and n = 22, respectively; twice daily, n = 78, 18, and 29, respectively. (B) Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and subclass ratios; once weekly, n = 28, 28, and 28, respectively; twice daily, n = 36, 36, and 36, respectively. (C) Triglycerides, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, VLDL3 cholesterol, ratio of VLDL cholesterol/VLDL3 cholesterol, and intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol; once weekly, n = 55, 18, 77, 106, and 7, respectively; twice daily, n = 52, 20, 75, 104, and 6, respectively. (D) Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and remnant lipoproteins; once weekly, n = 26 and n = 13, respectively; and twice daily, n = 34 and n = 21, respectively. (E) Total high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and its subclasses stratified by gender and overall subclass ratio; once weekly, n = 51, 39, 57, 22, 47, and 95, respectively; twice daily, n = 46, 39, 55, 17, 44, and 96, respectively. (F) High sensitivity C-reactive protein in the total cohort; once weekly, n = 104; twice daily, n = 103. Notes: High sensitivity C-reactive protein in the subgroup with baseline > 3 mg/L and <10 mg/L; once weekly, n = 41; twice daily, n = 32. Adjusted mean + standard error of the mean. *Week 30 change from baseline P < 0.05. Abbreviations: BL, baseline; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; ApoA1, apolipoprotein A1; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BID, twice daily; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL-C, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IDL-C, intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol; RLPs, remnant lipoproteins; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; QW, once weekly.

References

    1. NCEP Expert Panel. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106(25):3143–3421.
    1. Brunzell JD, Davidson M, Furberg CD, et al. Lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic risk: consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(4):811–822.
    1. Catapano AL, Reiner Z, De Backer G, et al. ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Atherosclerosis. 2011;217S:S1–S44.
    1. Contois JH, McConnell JP, Sethi AA, et al. Apolipoprotein B and cardiovascular disease risk: position statement from the AACC Lipoproteins and Vascular Diseases Division Working Group on Best Practices. Clin Chem. 2009;55(3):407–419.
    1. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):937–952.
    1. St-Pierre AC, Cantin B, Dagenais GR, et al. Low-density lipoprotein subfractions and the long-term risk of ischemic heart disease in men: 13-year follow-up data from the Quebec Cardiovascular Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25(3):553–559.
    1. Holme I, Aastveit AH, Hammar N, Jungner I, Walldius G. Inflammatory markers, lipoprotein components and risk of major cardiovascular events in 65,005 men and women in the Apolipoprotein MOrtality RISk study (AMORIS) Atherosclerosis. 2010;213(1):299–305.
    1. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, et al. Statin therapy, LDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(1):29–38.
    1. Drucker DJ, Sherman SI, Gorelick FS, Bergenstal RM, Sherwin RS, Buse JB. Incretin-based therapies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: evaluation of the risks and benefits. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(2):428–433.
    1. Bhushan R, Elkind-Hirsch KE, Bhushan M, Butler WJ, Duncan K, Marrioneaux O. Improved glycemic control and reduction of cardiometabolic risk factors in subjects with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome treated with exenatide in a clinical practice setting. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11(6):353–359.
    1. Bunck MC, Cornér A, Eliasson B, et al. One-year treatment with exenatide vs insulin glargine: effects on postprandial glycemia, lipid profiles, and oxidative stress. Atherosclerosis. 2010;212(1):223–229.
    1. Koska J, Schwartz EA, Mullin MP, Schwenke DC, Reaven PD. Improvement of postprandial endothelial function after a single dose of exenatide in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and recent-onset type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(5):1028–1030.
    1. Okerson T, Yan P, Stonehouse A, Brodows R. Effects of exenatide on systolic blood pressure in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Am J Hypertens. 2010;23(3):334–339.
    1. Nauck MA, Duran S, Kim D, et al. A comparison of twice-daily exenatide and biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled with sulfonylurea and metformin: a non-inferiority study. Diabetologia. 2007;50(2):259–267.
    1. Kapitza C, Nauck M, Trautmann M, et al. Long-term treatment with exenatide was associated with improved post-prandial glycaemic control and a shift from small to large HDL and LDL particles. Diabet Med. 2006;23(Suppl 4):S4.
    1. Drucker DJ, Buse JB, Taylor K, et al. Exenatide once weekly versus twice daily for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study. Lancet. 2008;372(9645):1240–1250.
    1. Kulkarni KR. Cholesterol profile measurement by vertical auto profile method. Clin Lab Med. 2006;2694:787–802.
    1. Kulkarni KR, Garber DW, Marcovina SM, Segrest JP. Quantification of cholesterol in all lipoprotein classes by the VAP-II method. J Lipid Res. 1994;35(1):159–168.
    1. Atherotech Diagnostics Lab. The VAP cholesterol test. 2012. [Accessed October 14, 2011]. Available from: .
    1. Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(Suppl 1):S11–S63. [No authors listed]
    1. Superko HR. Advanced lipoprotein testing and subfractionation are clinically useful. Circulation. 2009;119(17):2383–2395.
    1. Sniderman AD, Williams K, Contois JH, et al. A meta-analysis of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B as markers of cardiovascular risk. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4(3):337–345.
    1. Franceschini G, Bondioli A, Granata D, et al. Reduced HDL2 levels in myocardial infarction patients without risk factors for atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1987;68(3):213–219.
    1. Miller M, Stone NJ, Ballantyne C, et al. Triglycerides and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(20):2292–2333.
    1. Blonde L, Klein EJ, Han J, et al. Interim analysis of the effects of exenatide treatment on A1c, weight and cardiovascular risk factors over 82 weeks in 314 overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006;8(4):436–447.
    1. Klonoff DC, Buse JB, Nielsen LL, et al. Exenatide effects on diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and hepatic biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes treated for at least 3 years. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(1):275–286.
    1. Schwartz EA, Koska J, Mullin MP, Syoufi I, Schwenke DC, Reaven PD. Exenatide suppresses postprandial elevations in lipids and lipoproteins in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and recent onset type 2 diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis. 2010;212(1):217–222.
    1. Bergenstal RM, Wysham C, Macconell L, et al. Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9739):431–439.
    1. Wysham C, Bergenstal R, Malloy J, et al. DURATION-2: efficacy and safety of switching from maximum daily sitagliptin or pioglitazone to once-weekly exenatide. Diabet Med. 2011;28(6):705–714.
    1. Xiao C, Bandsma RH, Dash S, Szeto L, Lewis GF. Exenatide, a glucagon- like peptide receptor agonist, acutely inhibits intestinal lipoprotein production in healthy humans. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32(6):1513–1519.
    1. Bays H, Mandarino L, DeFronzo RA. Role of the adipocyte, free fatty acids, and ectopic fat in pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus: peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor agonists provide a rational therapeutic approach. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(2):463–478.
    1. Soinio M, Marniemi J, Laakso M, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 7-year follow-up study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(2):329–333.
    1. Wu JD, Xu XH, Zhu J, et al. Effect of exenatide on inflammatory and oxidative stress markers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(2):143–148.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren