Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Treatment-Naïve Diabetic Macular Edema: A Prospective, Uncontrolled Pilot Study

Ryan B Rush, Sloan W Rush, Ryan B Rush, Sloan W Rush

Abstract

Purpose: To report the outcomes in subjects undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for the management of treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods: Ten treatment-naïve subjects with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy prospectively underwent PPV with ILM peeling for the treatment of DME at a single university-affiliated institution. The preoperative features, intraoperative details and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed.

Results: All 10 subjects underwent PPV with ILM peeling without significant intraoperative or postoperative complications at 6 months follow-up. Visual acuity improved from a baseline of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.48-1.0) logMAR (Snellen 20/110) to 0.46 (95% CI: 0.3-0.62) logMAR (Snellen 20/58) at 6 months follow-up (p=0.045). Optical coherence tomography central macular thickness reduced from a baseline of 456 (95% CI: 394.7-516.4) microns to 316.8 (95% CI: 275.9-357.7) microns at 6 months follow-up (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that PPV with ILM peeling may be a viable treatment option for the management of treatment naïve DME in subjects with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Development of a randomized controlled trial may be justified to validate the results of this study.

Clinicaltrialsgov identifier #: NCT03660345.

Keywords: diabetic macular edema; internal limiting membrane peeling; vitrectomy.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

© 2021 Rush and Rush.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 68-year female with severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy presented with treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema with subjective vision loss for 9 months. (A) The preoperative (baseline) optical coherence tomography image displays substantial diabetic macular edema with a central macular thickness of 521 microns. The patient’s Snellen visual acuity was 20/125. (B) The 6-month postoperative optical coherence tomography image demonstrates resolution of the diabetic macular edema with a central macular thickness reduction to 245 microns following vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. The Snellen visual acuity improved to 20/50.

References

    1. Varma R, Bressler NM, Doan QV, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for diabetic macular edema in the United States. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(11):1334–1340. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.2854
    1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(12):1796–1806. doi:10.1001/archopht.1985.01050120030015
    1. Lam DS, Chan CK, Mohamed S, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone plus sequential grid laser versus triamcinolone or laser alone for treating diabetic macular edema: six-month outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(12):2162–2167. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.02.006
    1. Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, et al.; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1193–1203.
    1. Nakajima T, Roggia MF, Noda Y, et al. Effect of internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema: systematic Review and meta-analysis. Retina. 2015;35(9):1719–1725. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000622
    1. Simunovic MP, Hunyor AP, Ho IV. Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Ophthalmol. 2014;49(2):188–195. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.11.012
    1. Lewis H, Abrams GW, Blumenkranz MS, et al. Vitrectomy for diabetic macular traction and edema associated with posterior hyaloidal traction. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(5):753–759. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31901-3
    1. Yamamoto T, Akabane N, Takeuchi S. Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema: the role of posterior vitreous detachment and epimacular membrane. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132(3):369–377. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01050-9
    1. Haller JA, Qin H, Flaxel CJ, et al. Diabetic retinopathy clinical research network writing committee. Vitrectomy outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema and vitreomacular traction. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1087–1093.
    1. Kumagai K, Furukawa M, Ogino N, et al. Long-term follow-up of vitrectomy for diffuse nontractional diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2009;29(4):464–472. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e31819c632f
    1. Harbour JW, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW Jr, et al. Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema associated with a thickened and taut posterior hyaloid membrane. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;121(4):405–413. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70437-4
    1. Nasrallah FP, Jalkh AE, Van Coppenolle F, et al. The role of the vitreous in diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1988;95(10):1335–1339. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(88)33004-6
    1. Laidlaw DA. Vitrectomy for diabetic macular oedema. Eye (Lond). 2008;22(10):1337–1341. doi:10.1038/eye.2008.84
    1. Hoerauf H, Bruggemann A, Muecke M, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema. Internal limiting membrane delamination vs posterior hyaloid removal. A prospective randomized trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(7):997–1008. doi:10.1007/s00417-010-1610-8
    1. Nguyen QD, Brown DM, Marcus DM, et al. Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 Phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(4):789–801. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.039
    1. Korobelnik JF, Do DV, Schmidt-Erfurth U, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2247–2254. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.006
    1. Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, et al. Diabetic retinopathy clinical research network. Aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1193–1203.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren