Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-response Relationship of Golimumab in Patients with Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results from Phase 2/3 PURSUIT Induction and Maintenance Studies

Omoniyi J Adedokun, Zhenhua Xu, Colleen W Marano, Richard Strauss, Hongyan Zhang, Jewel Johanns, Honghui Zhou, Hugh M Davis, Walter Reinisch, Brian G Feagan, Paul Rutgeerts, William J Sandborn, Omoniyi J Adedokun, Zhenhua Xu, Colleen W Marano, Richard Strauss, Hongyan Zhang, Jewel Johanns, Honghui Zhou, Hugh M Davis, Walter Reinisch, Brian G Feagan, Paul Rutgeerts, William J Sandborn

Abstract

Background and aims: To assess golimumab pharmacokinetics [PK] and exposure-response [ER] in adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis [UC] from the Program of Ulcerative Colitis Research Studies Utilizing an Investigational Treatment [PURSUIT] studies.

Methods: We analysed golimumab PK and ER data of patients with moderate-to-severe UC from the PURSUIT-subcutaneous induction [N = 1064] and maintenance [N = 464] studies. Induction analyses evaluated serum golimumab concentration [SGC] and efficacy data through Week [wk] 6 following subcutaneous doses at wk0 and wk2; maintenance analyses assessed data through wk54 following 4-weekly dosing. ER relationships were assessed using trend, logistic regression, and receiver-operating-characteristic curve analyses.

Results: Median SGCs peaked at induction wk2 for golimumab 100/50mg, 200/100mg, and 400/200mg. Wk6 median SGCs were 0.78, 1.78, and 4.01 μg/ml, respectively. SGCs were sustained, reaching steady state approximately 8wks after golimumab maintenance commenced [wk14 of golimumab] regardless of induction dose. Median trough SGCs from maintenance wks8-44 ranged from 0.69 to 0.83 µg/ml [50 mg] and 1.33-1.58 µg/ml [100 mg]. SGCs were approximately dose proportional, and higher SGCs were associated with higher efficacy response rates during induction and maintenance. Factors associated with golimumab exposure were body weight, antibody-to-golimumab status, serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase, faecal markers, C-reactive protein, and pancolitis. SGCs of 2.5 µg/ml [induction wk6] and 1.4 µg/ml [maintenance steady-state trough] are potential target concentrations. Immunomodulators had no apparent impact on SGC with golimumab 100mg, whereas drug levels were slightly higher with golimumab 50mg with vs without immunomodulators.

Conclusions: SGCs are approximately dose proportional, and a positive SGC-efficacy relationship exists during induction/maintenance golimumab treatment of adult UC patients. Optimal SGC targets require validation in prospective studies.

Keywords: Ulcerative colitis; anti-tumour necrosis factor; pharmacokinetics.

© European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) 2016.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient disposition throughout the Program of Ulcerative Colitis Research Studies Utilizing an Investigational Treatment [PURSUIT] among 1064 patients who had serum golimumab concentration and efficacy outcome data suitable for analysis. IV, intravenous; M, maintenance; PK, pharmacokinetic; SC, subcutaneous.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Median serum golimumab concentrations illustrating dose proportionality over time during the induction phase of PURSUIT. IQR, interquartile range; PURSUIT, the Program of Ulcerative Colitis Research Studies Utilizing an Investigational Treatment.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Proportions of patients achieving clinical response, mucosal healing, and clinical remission during induction by SGC quartile at Week 6 [A], and during maintenance by SGC quartile at Week 44 [B], in PURSUIT. PURSUIT, Program of Ulcerative Colitis Research Studies Utilizing an Investigational Treatment; SGC, serum golimumab concentration.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis of optimal SGC thresholds associated with clinical response at Week 6 [A] and clinical remission at Weeks 30 and 54 [B] of the PURSUIT studies. CPW2/4/6/28/30/44/54, concentration at Week 2/4/6/28/30/44/54; PURSUIT, Program of Ulcerative Colitis Research Studies Utilizing an Investigational Treatment; SGC, serum golimumab concentration.

References

    1. Seow CH, Newman A, Irwin SP, et al. Trough serum infliximab: a predictive factor of clinical outcome for infliximab treatment in acute ulcerative colitis. Gut 2010;59:49–54.
    1. Murthy S, Kevans D, Seow CH, et al. Association of serum infliximab and antibodies to infliximab to long-term clinical outcome in acute ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2012;142 [Suppl 1]:S-388.
    1. Adedokun OJ, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, et al. Association between serum concentration of infliximab and efficacy in adult patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2014;147:1296–307.
    1. Roblin X, Marotte H, Rinaudo M, et al. Association between pharmacokinetics of adalimumab and mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:80–4.
    1. Paul S, Moreau AC, Del Tedesco E, et al. Pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014;20:1288–95.
    1. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Marano C, et al. ; for the PURSUIT-SC Study Group. Subcutaneous golimumab induces clinical response and remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2014;146:85–95.
    1. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Marano C, et al. ; for the PURSUIT-Maintenance Study Group. Subcutaneous golimumab maintains clinical response in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2014; 146: 96–109.
    1. Detrez I, Dreesen E, VanStappen T, et al. Variability in golimumab exposure: a ‘real-life’ observational study in active ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2016;10:575–81.
    1. Zhuang Y, Xu Z, Frederick B, et al. Golimumab pharmacokinetics after repeated subcutaneous and intravenous administrations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and the effect of concomitant methotrexate: an open label, randomised study. Clin Ther 2012;34:77–90.
    1. Schroeder KW, Tremaine WJ, Ilstrup DM. Coated oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. a randomised study. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1625–9.
    1. D’Haens G, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, et al. A review of activity indices and efficacy end points for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:763–86.
    1. Rutgeerts P, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, et al. Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2462–76.
    1. Ternant D, Ducourau E, Perdriger A, et al. Relationship between inflammation and infliximab pharmacokinetics in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2014;78:118–28.
    1. Xu Z, Davis HM, Zhou H. Clinical impact of concomitant immunomodulators on biologic therapy: Pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, efficacy and safety. J Clin Pharmacol 2015;55 [Suppl 3]:S60–74.
    1. Fasanmade AA, Adedokun OJ, Blank M, et al. Pharmacokinetic properties of infliximab in children and adults with Crohn’s disease: a retrospective analysis of data from 2 phase III clinical trials. Clin Ther 2011;33:946–64.
    1. Fasanmade AA, Adedokun OJ, Ford J, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of infliximab in patients with ulcerative colitis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2009;65:1211–28.
    1. Cornillie F, Hanauer SB, Diamond RH, et al. Postinduction serum infliximab trough level and decrease of C-reactive protein level are associated with durable sustained response to infliximab: a retrospective analysis of the ACCENT I trial. Gut 2014;63:1721–7.
    1. Maser EA, Villela R, Silverberg MS, et al. Association of trough serum infliximab to clinical outcome after scheduled maintenance treatment for Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:1248–54.
    1. Chiu YL, Rubin DT, Vermeire S, et al. Serum adalimumab concentration and clinical remission in patients with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013;19:1112–22.
    1. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Allez M, et al. Association between plasma concentrations of certolizumab pegol and endoscopic outcomes of patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:423–31.
    1. Marini J, Sendecki J, Cornillie F, et al. Comparison of commercially available assays for infliximab concentrations and antibodies to infliximab with assays developed at Janssen and used in clinical studies of Remicade® [infliximab] in IBD patients. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2015;3[5S]:A421.
    1. Steenholdt C, Brynskov J, Thomsen OO, et al. Individualised therapy is more cost-effective than dose intensification in patients with Crohn’s disease who lose response to anti-TNF treatment: a randomised, controlled trial. Gut 2014;63:919–27.
    1. vande Casteele N, Gils A, Ballet V, et al. Randomised controlled trial of drug level versus clinically based dosing of infliximab maintenance therapy in IBD: final results of the TAXIT study. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2013;1[1S]:A1–A134.
    1. Vaughn BP, Martinez-Vazquez M, Patwardhan VR, et al. Proactive therapeutic concentration monitoring of infliximab may improve outcomes for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: results from a pilot observational study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014;20:1996–2003.
    1. Paul S, Del Tedesco E, Marotte H, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab and mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 2013;144:S-92.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren