Towards the measurement of food literacy with respect to healthy eating: the development and validation of the self perceived food literacy scale among an adult sample in the Netherlands

Maartje P Poelman, S Coosje Dijkstra, Hanne Sponselee, Carlijn B M Kamphuis, Marieke C E Battjes-Fries, Marleen Gillebaart, Jacob C Seidell, Maartje P Poelman, S Coosje Dijkstra, Hanne Sponselee, Carlijn B M Kamphuis, Marieke C E Battjes-Fries, Marleen Gillebaart, Jacob C Seidell

Abstract

Background: Food literacy refers to the capability to make healthy food choices in different contexts, settings and situations. The aim of this study is to develop and validate the self-perceived food literacy (SPFL) scale, to assess individuals' level of food literacy, including a knowledge, skills and behavior to plan, manage, select, prepare and eat food healthfully.

Methods: An initial set of 50 items for the SPFL scale were generated based on expert insights and literature. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among a sample of Dutch adults (n = 755) in order to determine convergent, divergent and criterion validation against psychosocial variables that were expected to correlate with food literacy (self-control, impulsiveness) and against the expected outcome of high food literacy, namely healthy food consumption. Principal Component Analyses (PCA), Pearson correlation tests and linear regression analyses were conducted. The capacity to distinguish of the SPFL scale was determined by comparing SPFL scores of the general population with that of a sample of dieticians (n = 207).

Results: The participants in the general sample had an average age of 44.8 (SD:16.1), the majority were women (90.7%), they had a healthy weight (61.4%) and were highly educated (59.1%). Of the initial 50 items, 29 items remained after PCA and reflected eight domains of food literacy. SPFL was positively correlated with self-control (r = 0.51, p = <.001) and negatively with impulsiveness (r = - 0.31, p = <.01). Participants with higher levels of food literacy reported a significantly higher frequency of fruit consumption (≥5 times/week), vegetable consumption (≥5times/week) and fish consumption (≥1times/week) and consumed larger portions of fruit (≥2pieces/day) and vegetables ≥200 g/day) in comparison with participants who had lower levels of food literacy. Dieticians had slightly higher scores on SPFL than general adults (B = 0.08, SE = 0.03, t = 2.83, 95%-CI = 0.03 to 0.14).

Conclusions: The 29 item SPFL scale is a validated, expert-based and theory-driven tool for measuring self-perceived food literacy with respect to healthy eating among adults. Higher levels of food literacy were associated with more self-control, less impulsiveness and healthier food consumption. Additional research is needed to validate the SPFL scale in different populations (different age groups, socioeconomic groups, male populations) and in different contexts.

Keywords: Eating behavior; Food consumption; Food literacy; Health; Impulsiveness; Questionnaire; Self-control.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow in sub analyses to develop and validate the Self-Perceived Food Literacy scale. Footnote: of the initial 911 participants of the general population (that participated in the scale structure and reliability analyses), 755 participants completed the whole questionnaire and were included in the analyses required for validation. In total 207 dieticians also completed the questionnaire

References

    1. Popkin BM. Global nutrition dynamics: the world is shifting rapidly toward a diet linked with noncommunicable diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:289–298.
    1. Sotos-Prieto M, Bhupathiraju SN, Mattei J, Fung TT, Li Y, Pan A, et al. Association of Changes in diet quality with Total and cause-specific mortality. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:143–153. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613502.
    1. Shiftn cvba. Obesity System Influence Diagram. 2008. . Accessed 2 Nov 2017.
    1. Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, McPherson K, Finegood DT, Moodie ML, et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet (London, England) 2011;378:804–814. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60813-1.
    1. Chaput J-P. Sleep patterns, diet quality and energy balance. Physiol Behav. 2014;134:86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.09.006.
    1. Jabs J, Devine CM. Time scarcity and food choices: an overview. Appetite. 2006;47:196–204. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.02.014.
    1. Zellner DA, Loaiza S, Gonzalez Z, Pita J, Morales J, Pecora D, et al. Food selection changes under stress. Physiol Behav. 2006;87:789–793. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.01.014.
    1. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. VCP 2012–2016, 1–79 jaar - RIVM. 2016. . Accessed 2 Nov 2017.
    1. Velardo S. The nuances of health literacy, nutrition literacy, and food literacy. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015;47:385–389. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.04.328.
    1. Sørensen K, Van Den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80.
    1. Azevedo Perry E, Thomas H, Samra HR, Edmonstone S, Davidson L, Faulkner A, et al. Identifying attributes of food literacy: a scoping review. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20:2406–2415. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001276.
    1. Colatruglio S, Slater J. Food Literacy: Bridging the Gap between Food, Nutrtition and Well-being. In: Deer F, Falkenberg T, Mcmillan B, Sims L, editors. Sustainable well-being: concepts, issues, and educational practices. p. 37–55.
    1. Truman E, Lane D, Elliott C. Defining food literacy: a scoping review. Appetite. 2017;116:365–371. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.007.
    1. Vidgen HA, Gallegos D. Defining food literacy and its components. Appetite. 2014;76:50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.010.
    1. werkgroep voedselvaardigheden (workinggroup food literacy). No Title. 2015. .
    1. Palumbo R. Sustainability of well-being through literacy. The effects of food literacy on sustainability of well-being. Agric Agric Sci. PRO. 2016;8:99–106.
    1. Pendergast D, Dewhurst Y. Home economics and food literacy : an international investigation. Int J Home Econ. 2012;5:245–263.
    1. Kolasa KM, Peery A, Harris NG, Shovelin K. Food literacy partners program: a strategy to increase community food literacy. Top Clin Nutr. 2001;16:1-10.
    1. Nowak AJ, Kolouch G, Schneyer L, Roberts KH. Building food literacy and positive relationships with healthy food in children through school gardens. Child Obes. 2012;8:392–395. doi: 10.1089/chi.2012.0084.
    1. Krause C, Sommerhalder K, Beer-Borst S, Abel T. Just a subtle difference? Findings from a systematic review on definitions of nutrition literacy and food literacy. Health Promot Int. 2016:daw084. 10.1093/heapro/daw084.
    1. Bellotti B. Food Literacy: Reconnecting the City with the country. Agric Sci. 2010;22(3):29-34. . ISSN: 1030-4614. [cited 2 Nov 17].
    1. Rawl R, Kolasa KM, Lee J, Whetstone LM. A learn and serve nutrition program: the food literacy partners program. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008;40:49–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2007.04.372.
    1. Thomas HMC, Irwin JD, Figueroa-Colon R, Franklin FA, Lee JY, Aldridge R, et al. Cook it up! A community-based cooking program for at-risk youth: overview of a food literacy intervention. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:495. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-495.
    1. Brooks N, Begley A. Adolescent food literacy programmes: a review of the literature. Nutr Diet. 2014;71:158–171. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12096.
    1. Lohse B, Satter E, Horacek T, Gebreselassie T, Oakland MJ. Measuring eating competence: psychometric properties and validity of the ecSatter inventory. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39(5 Suppl):S154–S166. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2007.04.371.
    1. Gréa Krause C, Beer-Borst S, Sommerhalder K, Hayoz S, Abel T. A short food literacy questionnaire (SFLQ) for adults: findings from a Swiss validation study. Appetite. 2018;120:275–280. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.039.
    1. Liao L-L, Lai I-J. Construction of nutrition literacy indicators for college students in Taiwan: a Delphi consensus study. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017;49:734–742. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.05.351.
    1. Vidgen HA. Food Literacy: Key Concepts for Health and Education - Google Boeken. 1st ed. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd,; 2016.
    1. Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Pelikan JM, Fullam J, Doyle G, Slonska Z, et al. Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the European health literacy survey questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q) BMC Public Health. 2013;13:948. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-948.
    1. Bell R, Marshall DW. The construct of food involvement in behavioral research: scale development and validation. Appetite. 2003;40:235–244. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00009-6.
    1. Parmenter K, Wardle J. Development of a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire for adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999;53:298–308. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600726.
    1. Poelman MP, De Vet E, Velema E, Seidell JC, Steenhuis IHM. Behavioral strategies to control the amount of food selected and consumed. Appetite. 2014;72:156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.09.015.
    1. Kamphuis CBM, Jansen T, Mackenbach JP, Van Lenthe FJ. Bourdieu’s cultural capital in relation to food choices: a systematic review of cultural capital indicators and an empirical proof of concept. PLoS One. 2015;10 10.1371/journal.pone.0130695.
    1. Burton M, Reid M, Worsley A, Mavondo F. Food skills confidence and household gatekeepers’ dietary practices. Appetite. 2017;108:183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.033.
    1. Wrieden WL, Anderson AS, Longbottom PJ, Valentine K, Stead M, Caraher M, et al. The impact of a community-based food skills intervention on cooking confidence, food preparation methods and dietary choices – an exploratory trial. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10:203–211. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007246658.
    1. Anderson AS, Bell A, Adamson A, Moynihan P. A questionnaire assessment of nutrition knowledge – validity and reliability issues. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:497–503. doi: 10.1079/PHNPHN2001307.
    1. De Vet E, De Wit JBF, Luszczynska A, Stok FM, Gaspar T, Pratt M, et al. Access to excess: how do adolescents deal with unhealthy foods in their environment? Eur J Pub Health. 2013;23:752–756. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks185.
    1. Kemps E, Herman CP, Hollitt S, Polivy J, Prichard I, Tiggemann M. Contextual cue exposure effects on food intake in restrained eaters. Physiol Behav. 2016;167:71–75. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.09.004.
    1. Ferriday D, Brunstrom JM. ‘I just can’t help myself’: effects of food-cue exposure in overweight and lean individuals. Int J Obes. 2011;35:142–149. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2010.117.
    1. Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol. 1989;44:1175–1184. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175.
    1. Rothbaum F, Weisz JR, Snyder SS. Changing the world and changing the self: a two-process model of perceived control. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982;42:5–37. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.5.
    1. Carver CS, Scheier MF. Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior. 1981.
    1. Metcalfe J, Mischel W. A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower. Psychol Rev. 1999;106:3–19. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3.
    1. Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers. 2004;72:271–324. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x.
    1. De Ridder DTD, Lensvelt-Mulders G, Finkenauer C, Stok FM, Baumeister RF. Taking stock of self-control: a meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;16:76–99. doi: 10.1177/1088868311418749.
    1. Barlow DH, Durand VM. Abnormal psychology: an integrative approach. Belmont: Cengage Learning; 2012.
    1. Guerrieri R, Nederkoorn C, Jansen A. Disinhibition is easier learned than inhibition. The effects of (dis)inhibition training on food intake. Appetite. 2012;59:96–99. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.04.006.
    1. Nederkoorn C, Guerrieri R, Havermans RC, Roefs A, Jansen A. The interactive effect of hunger and impulsivity on food intake and purchase in a virtual supermarket. Int J Obes. 2009;33:905–912. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.98.
    1. Youn S, Faber RJ. Impulse buying: its relation to personality traits and cues. Adv Consum Res. 2000;27:179–185. doi: 10.1086/314319.
    1. Jasinska AJ, Yasuda M, Burant CF, Gregor N, Khatri S, Sweet M, et al. Impulsivity and inhibitory control deficits are associated with unhealthy eating in young adults. Appetite. 2012;59:738–747. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.08.001.
    1. Coutlee CG, Politzer CS, Hoyle RH, Huettel SA. An abbreviated impulsiveness scale constructed through confirmatory factor analysis of the Barratt impulsiveness scale version 11. Arch Sci Psychol. 2014;2:1–12.
    1. Block G, Gillespie C, Rosenbaum EH, Jenson C. A rapid food screener to assess fat and fruit and vegetable intake. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:284–288. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00119-7.
    1. Kim Daniel J, Holowaty Eric J. Brief, validated survey instruments for the measurement of fruit and vegetable intakes in adults: a review. Prev Med (Baltim) 2003;36:440–447. doi: 10.1016/S0091-7435(02)00040-3.
    1. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology: Oxford University Press; 1998.
    1. Nutbeam D. Defining and measuring health literacy: what can we learn from literacy studies? Int J Public Health. 2009;54:303–305. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-0050-x.
    1. Frisch AL, Camerini L, Diviani N, Schulz PJ. Defining and measuring health literacy: how can we profit from other literacy domains? Health Promot Int. 2012;27:117–126. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar043.
    1. Braun E, Woodley A, Richardson JTE, Leidner B. Self-rated competences questionnaires from a design perspective. Educ Res Rev. 2012;7:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.005.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren