Attitudes and Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Early Stages of Dementia and Their Caregivers: Cross-Sectional Study

Jose Guzman-Parra, Pilar Barnestein-Fonseca, Gloria Guerrero-Pertiñez, Peter Anderberg, Luis Jimenez-Fernandez, Esperanza Valero-Moreno, Jessica Marian Goodman-Casanova, Antonio Cuesta-Vargas, Maite Garolera, Maria Quintana, Rebeca I García-Betances, Evi Lemmens, Johan Sanmartin Berglund, Fermin Mayoral-Cleries, Jose Guzman-Parra, Pilar Barnestein-Fonseca, Gloria Guerrero-Pertiñez, Peter Anderberg, Luis Jimenez-Fernandez, Esperanza Valero-Moreno, Jessica Marian Goodman-Casanova, Antonio Cuesta-Vargas, Maite Garolera, Maria Quintana, Rebeca I García-Betances, Evi Lemmens, Johan Sanmartin Berglund, Fermin Mayoral-Cleries

Abstract

Background: Information and communication technologies are promising tools to increase the quality of life of people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and that of their caregivers. However, there are barriers to their use associated with sociodemographic factors and negative attitudes, as well as inadequate knowledge about technologies.

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze technophilia (attitudes toward new technologies) and the use of smartphones and tablets along with associated factors in people with dementia/mild cognitive impairment and their caregivers.

Methods: Data from the first visit of the Support Monitoring and Reminder for Mild Dementia (SMART4MD) randomized multicenter clinical trial were used for this analysis. Data were obtained from two European countries, Spain and Sweden, and from three centers: Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (Catalonia, Spain), Servicio Andaluz de Salud (Andalusia, Spain), and the Blekinge Institute of Technology (Sweden). Participants with a score between 20 and 28 in the Mini Mental State Examination, with memory problems (for more than 6 months), and who were over the age of 55 years were included in the study, along with their caregivers. The bivariate Chi square and Mann-Whitney tests, and multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis.

Results: A total of 1086 dyads were included (N=2172). Overall, 299 (27.53%) of people with dementia/mild cognitive impairment had a diagnosis of dementia. In addition, 588 (54.14%) of people with dementia/mild cognitive impairment reported using a smartphone almost every day, and 106 (9.76%) used specific apps or software to support their memory. Among the caregivers, 839 (77.26%) used smartphones and tablets almost every day, and 181 (16.67%) used specific apps or software to support their memory. The people with dementia/mild cognitive impairment showed a lower level of technophilia in comparison to that of their caregivers after adjusting for confounders (B=0.074, P=.02) with differences in technology enthusiasm (B=0.360, P<.001), but not in technology anxiety (B=-0.042, P=.37). Technophilia was associated with lower age (B=-0.009, P=.004), male gender (B=-0.160, P<.001), higher education level (P=.01), living arrangement (living with children vs single; B=-2.538, P=.01), country of residence (Sweden vs Spain; B=0.256, P<.001), lower depression (B=-0.046, P<.001), and better health status (B=0.004, P<.001) in people with dementia/mild cognitive impairment. Among caregivers, technophilia was associated with comparable sociodemographic factors (except for living arrangement), along with a lower caregiver burden (B=-0.005, P=.04) and better quality of life (B=0.348, P<.001).

Conclusions: Technophilia was associated with a better quality of life and sociodemographic variables in people with dementia/mild cognitive impairment and caregivers, suggesting potential barriers for technological interventions. People with dementia/mild cognitive impairment frequently use smartphones and tablets, but the use of specific apps or software to support memory is limited. Interventions using these technologies are needed to overcome barriers in this population related to sociodemographic characteristics and the lack of enthusiasm for new technologies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03325699; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03325699.

Keywords: aging; dementia eHealth; information and communication technology; mild cognitive impairment; technophilia.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Jose Guzman-Parra, Pilar Barnestein-Fonseca, Gloria Guerrero-Pertiñez, Peter Anderberg, Luis Jimenez-Fernandez, Esperanza Valero-Moreno, Jessica Marian Goodman-Casanova, Antonio Cuesta-Vargas, Maite Garolera, Maria Quintana, Rebeca I García-Betances, Evi Lemmens, Johan Sanmartin Berglund, Fermin Mayoral-Cleries. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 01.06.2020.

References

    1. World Health Organization and Alzheimer’s Disease International. 2012. [2019-11-01]. Dementia: a public health priority Internet
    1. Forrester SN, Gallo JJ, Smith GS, Leoutsakos JS. Patterns of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Risk of Dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;24(2):117–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2015.05.007.
    1. Cerejeira J, Lagarto L, Mukaetova-Ladinska EB. Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Front Neurol. 2012;3:73. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2012.00073.
    1. Szeto JYY, Lewis SJG. Current Treatment Options for Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease Dementia. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2016;14(4):326–338. doi: 10.2174/1570159x14666151208112754.
    1. Khosravi P, Ghapanchi AH. Investigating the effectiveness of technologies applied to assist seniors: A systematic literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jan;85(1):17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.014.
    1. Tyack C, Camic PM. Touchscreen interventions and the well-being of people with dementia and caregivers: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Aug;29(8):1261–1280. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000667.
    1. Berner J, Comijs H, Elmståhl S, Welmer A, Sanmartin Berglund J, Anderberg P, Deeg D. Maintaining cognitive function with internet use: a two-country, six-year longitudinal study. Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Aug 9;31(07):929–936. doi: 10.1017/s1041610219000668.
    1. Koo BM, Vizer LM. Examining Mobile Technologies to Support Older Adults With Dementia Through the Lens of Personhood and Human Needs: Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Nov 11;7(11):e15122. doi: 10.2196/15122.
    1. Grossman MR, Zak DK, Zelinski EM. Mobile Apps for Caregivers of Older Adults: Quantitative Content Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jul 30;6(7):e162. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9345.
    1. Klimova B. Mobile Phone Apps in the Management and Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment and/or Mild-to-Moderate Dementia: An Opinion Article on Recent Findings. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:461. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00461.
    1. Klimova B, Simonova I, Poulova P, Truhlarova Z, Kuca K. Older people and their attitude to the use of information and communication technologies ? A review study with special focus on the Czech Republic (older people and their attitude to ICT) Educ Gerontol. 2016;42(5):361–369. doi: 10.1080/03601277.2015.1122447.
    1. Joe J, Demiris G. Older adults and mobile phones for health: a review. J Biomed Inform. 2013 Oct;46(5):947–954. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.06.008.
    1. Hitch D, Swan J, Pattison R, Stefaniak R. Use of touchscreen tablet technology by people with dementia in homes: A scoping review. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2017;4:2055668317733382. doi: 10.1177/2055668317733382.
    1. Zhang MWB, Chan S, Wynne O, Jeong S, Hunter S, Wilson A, Ho RCM. Conceptualization of an evidence-based smartphone innovation for caregivers and persons living with dementia. Technol Health Care. 2016 Sep 14;24(5):769–773. doi: 10.3233/THC-161165.
    1. Selwyn N, Gorard S, Furlong J, Madden L. Older adults' use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Age Soc. 2003 Sep 02;23(5):561–582. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X03001302.
    1. O'Connor S, Bouamrane M, O'Donnell CA, Mair FS. Barriers to Co-Designing Mobile Technology with Persons with Dementia and Their Carers. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:1028–1029.
    1. Osiceanu M. Psychological Implications of Modern Technologies: “Technofobia” versus “Technophilia”. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015 May;180:1137–1144. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.229.
    1. Anderberg P, Barnestein-Fonseca P, Guzman-Parra J, Garolera M, Quintana M, Mayoral-Cleries F, Lemmens E, Sanmartin Berglund J. The Effects of the Digital Platform Support Monitoring and Reminder Technology for Mild Dementia (SMART4MD) for People With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Informal Carers: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jun 21;8(6):e13711. doi: 10.2196/13711.
    1. Anderberg P, Eivazzadeh S, Berglund JS. A Novel Instrument for Measuring Older People's Attitudes Toward Technology (TechPH): Development and Validation. J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 23;21(5):e13951. doi: 10.2196/13951.
    1. Logsdon Rebecca G, Gibbons Laura E, McCurry Susan M, Teri Linda. Quality of life in Alzheimer's disease: Patient and caregiver reports. Journal of Mental Health and Aging. 1999;5(1):21–32.
    1. van Reenen M, Oppe M. EQ-5D. 2015. [2020-05-10]. EQ-5D-3L user guide
    1. König H, Bernert S, Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H, Martinez M, Vilagut G, Haro JM, de Girolamo G, de Graaf R, Kovess V, Alonso J, ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 Investigators Comparison of population health status in six european countries: results of a representative survey using the EQ-5D questionnaire. Med Care. 2009 Feb;47(2):255–261. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318184759e.
    1. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–186.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
    1. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17(1):37–49. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4.
    1. World Health Organization. 2004. [2020-05-10]. ICD-10 : international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems : tenth revision, 2nd ed .
    1. Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980 Dec;20(6):649–655. doi: 10.1093/geront/20.6.649.
    1. Bédard M, Molloy DW, Squire L, Dubois S, Lever JA, O'Donnell M. The Zarit Burden Interview: a new short version and screening version. Gerontologist. 2001 Oct;41(5):652–657. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.5.652.
    1. LaMonica HM, English A, Hickie IB, Ip J, Ireland C, West S, Shaw T, Mowszowski L, Glozier N, Duffy S, Gibson AA, Naismith SL. Examining Internet and eHealth Practices and Preferences: Survey Study of Australian Older Adults With Subjective Memory Complaints, Mild Cognitive Impairment, or Dementia. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 25;19(10):e358. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7981.
    1. Heart T, Kalderon E. Older adults: are they ready to adopt health-related ICT? Int J Med Inform. 2013 Nov;82(11):e209–e231. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.002.
    1. Halmdienst N, Radhuber M, Winter-Ebmer R. Attitudes of elderly Austrians towards new technologies: communication and entertainment versus health and support use. Eur J Ageing. 2019 Dec;16(4):513–523. doi: 10.1007/s10433-019-00508-y.
    1. Fischer SH, David D, Crotty BH, Dierks M, Safran C. Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders. Int J Med Inform. 2014 Sep;83(9):624–635. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.005.
    1. Gell NM, Rosenberg DE, Demiris G, LaCroix AZ, Patel KV. Patterns of technology use among older adults with and without disabilities. Gerontologist. 2015 Jun;55(3):412–421. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt166.
    1. Tacken M, Marcellini F, Mollenkopf H, Ruoppila I, Széman Z. Use and acceptance of new technology by older people. Findings of the international MOBILATE survey: 'Enhancing mobility in later life.'. Gerontechnology. 2005;3(3):126–137. doi: 10.4017/gt.2005.03.03.002.00.
    1. Conrad AM, Munro D. Relationships between Computer Self-Efficacy, Technology, Attitudes and Anxiety: Development of the Computer Technology Use Scale (CTUS) J Educ Comput Res. 2008 Oct 20;39(1):51–73. doi: 10.2190/ec.39.1.d.
    1. König R, Seifert A, Doh M. Internet use among older Europeans: an analysis based on SHARE data. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2018 Jan 19;17(3):621–633. doi: 10.1007/s10209-018-0609-5.
    1. Rasche P, Wille M, Bröhl C, Theis S, Schäfer K, Knobe M, Mertens A. Prevalence of Health App Use Among Older Adults in Germany: National Survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 23;6(1):e26. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8619.
    1. Hedman A, Nygård L, Almkvist O, Kottorp A. Amount and type of everyday technology use over time in older adults with cognitive impairment. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015 May;22(3):196–206. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2014.982172.
    1. Xie Z, Nacioglu A, Or C. Prevalence, Demographic Correlates, and Perceived Impacts of Mobile Health App Use Amongst Chinese Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Dec 26;6(4):e103. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9002.
    1. Rosenberg L, Kottorp A, Winblad B, Nygård L. Perceived difficulty in everyday technology use among older adults with or without cognitive deficits. Scand J Occup Ther. 2009;16(4):216–226. doi: 10.3109/11038120802684299.
    1. Sherman C, Liu CS, Herrmann N, Lanctôt KL. Prevalence, neurobiology, and treatments for apathy in prodromal dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Feb;30(2):177–184. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000527.
    1. van der Linde RM, Matthews FE, Dening T, Brayne C. Patterns and persistence of behavioural and psychological symptoms in those with cognitive impairment: the importance of apathy. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;32(3):306–315. doi: 10.1002/gps.4464.
    1. Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:112–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.004.
    1. Cotten SR, Ford G, Ford S, Hale TM. Internet use and depression among retired older adults in the United States: a longitudinal analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Sep;69(5):763–771. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu018.
    1. Khalaila R, Vitman-Schorr A. Internet use, social networks, loneliness, and quality of life among adults aged 50 and older: mediating and moderating effects. Qual Life Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):479–489. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1749-4.
    1. Lee HY, Kim J, Sharratt M. Technology use and its association with health and depressive symptoms in older cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):467–477. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1734-y.
    1. Hill NTM, Mowszowski L, Naismith SL, Chadwick VL, Valenzuela M, Lampit A. Computerized Cognitive Training in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 01;174(4):329–340. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030360.
    1. Coyle H, Traynor V, Solowij N. Computerized and virtual reality cognitive training for individuals at high risk of cognitive decline: systematic review of the literature. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;23(4):335–359. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.04.009.
    1. Butler M, McCreedy E, Nelson VA, Desai P, Ratner E, Fink HA, Hemmy LS, McCarten JR, Barclay TR, Brasure M, Davila H, Kane RL. Does Cognitive Training Prevent Cognitive Decline?: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jan 02;168(1):63–68. doi: 10.7326/M17-1531.
    1. Ge S, Zhu Z, Wu B, McConnell ES. Technology-based cognitive training and rehabilitation interventions for individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Sep 15;18(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0893-1.

Source: PubMed

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

3
Abonnieren