Safety and Efficacy of a Sublingual Specific Immunotherapy With an Extract of a Six Grass Pollen Mixture

January 23, 2014 updated by: Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG

A Multicentre, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Perennial Sublingual Specific Immunotherapy With a Liquid Formulation of an Extract of a Six Grass Pollen-mixture in Patients With Clinically Relevant Grass Pollen Sensitivity.

The trial is performed to asses efficacy and safety of a sublingual extract of a six grass pollen mixture

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Reinbek, Germany, 21465
        • Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Rhinitis, Rhinoconjunctivitis, Positive Rast result to grass pollen, Positive skin prick test to grass pollen, Positive specific provocation to grass pollen,

Exclusion Criteria:

Serious chronic diseases, Other perennial allergies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo was given the same way as a sublingual preparation.
Solution for sublingual application containing Placebo. The study solution was applied sublingually, kept under the tongue for 3 minutes, and swallowed thereafter.
Other Names:
  • Specific Immunotherapy
Experimental: Liquid formulation of an extract of a 6 grass pollen mixture

Sublingual application containing allergen extracts of 6 grass pollen species (Holcus lanatus, Dactylus glomerata, Lolium perenne, Phleum pratense, Poa pratensis, Festuca pratensis) pollen allergen extract.

The study solution was applied sublingually, kept under the tongue for 3 minutes, and swallowed thereafter. Initial treatment was applied on the first day of treatment with a starting dose of 25% of the maintenance dose. Increasing doses of 50% were applied with the second and 100% with the third dose to give the maximum (=maintenance) dose. This was followed by a daily patient selfadministered treatment with the maintenance dose.

Solution for sublingual application containing allergen extracts of 6 grass pollen species (Holcus lanatus, Dactylus glomerata, Lolium perenne, Phleum pratense, Poa pratensis, Festuca pratensis) pollen allergen extract.

The study solution was applied sublingually, kept under the tongue for 3 minutes, and swallowed thereafter.

Other Names:
  • specific immunotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom and Medication Score (SMS)
Time Frame: 1.5 years of therapy
The primary endpoint is the change of the area under the curve (AUC, derived from an analysis period of 42 days) of the daily sum of the Symptom and Medication Score (SMS) from the baseline measurement to the measurement after 1.5 years of therapy.
1.5 years of therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Rating Scale
Time Frame: 1.5 years
Patients' Assessment of severity of symptoms at the end of each season on a 10 points visual rating scale (VRS)
1.5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ludger Klimek, M.D.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

December 13, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Grass Pollen Allergy

Clinical Trials on Comparator

3
Subscribe