Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Efficacy and Safety of Peginesatide Injection for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Peritoneal Dialysis Participants Previously Treated With Epoetin.

13 de agosto de 2012 actualizado por: Takeda

A Phase 2 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Hematide Injection for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Peritoneal Dialysis Subjects Previously Treated With Epoetin

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of peginesatide injection for maintenance treatment of anemia in participants on peritoneal dialysis.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

According to the International Federation of Renal Registries, in 1999 the prevalence of peritoneal dialysis in the United States as approximately 9.5% of patients receiving dialysis (2005 United States Renal Data Systems data indicates a prevalence of around 7.5%). Data from Europe in 1999 to 2000 (not including the United Kingdom, France or Germany) indicated peritoneal dialysis was the mode of dialysis in approximately 11.1% of dialysis patients. 2006 data from the United Kingdom indicates that more than 20% of patients on dialysis are receiving peritoneal dialysis while French and German data indicate rates of 8.1% and 4.8% respectively. More than 90% of patients with chronic renal failure/chronic kidney disease Stage 5 (End Stage Renal Disease) are anemic. The vast majority of patients receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis receive erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy to treat their anemia.

Anemia of chronic renal failure is due to several factors, primarily the inability of the diseased kidneys to produce adequate amounts of endogenous erythropoietin. Ancillary factors also include the shortened lifespan of red blood cells, iron and other nutritional deficiencies, infection, and inflammation. The prevalence of anemia increases with progressive deterioration of renal function, and affects more than 90% of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage 5 (End Stage Renal Disease). Anemia is associated with increased mortality, increased likelihood of hospitalization, reduced cognitive function and exercise capacity, increased left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure. Treatment of anemia reduces morbidity and mortality risks and may improve quality of life.

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents have been established as a treatment for anemia in chronic renal failure participants, and have improved the management of anemia over alternatives such as transfusion. Peginesatide (hematide) is a parenteral formulation being developed for the correction of anemia in patients with chronic renal failure, and binds to and activates the human erythropoietin receptor and stimulates erythropoiesis in human red cell precursors in a manner similar to other known erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Participants in this study received variable doses of peginesatide injection once every four weeks. Total commitment time for this study was about 29 weeks.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

59

Fase

  • Fase 2

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • New South Wales
      • New Lambtom, New South Wales, Australia
    • California
      • Azusa, California, Estados Unidos
      • Los Angeles, California, Estados Unidos
      • Whittier, California, Estados Unidos
    • Florida
      • Naples, Florida, Estados Unidos
    • Georgia
      • Decatur, Georgia, Estados Unidos
    • Illinois
      • Evergreen Park, Illinois, Estados Unidos
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, Estados Unidos
    • Louisiana
      • Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Estados Unidos
      • New Iberia, Louisiana, Estados Unidos
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, Estados Unidos
    • Mississippi
      • Columbus, Mississippi, Estados Unidos
      • Tupelo, Mississippi, Estados Unidos
    • New York
      • New York, New York, Estados Unidos
      • Williamsville, New York, Estados Unidos
    • Ohio
      • Canton, Ohio, Estados Unidos
    • Texas
      • Arlington, Texas, Estados Unidos
      • Tyler, Texas, Estados Unidos
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, Estados Unidos
      • Mechanicsville, Virginia, Estados Unidos
      • Modena, Italia
      • Dunedin, Nueva Zelanda
    • England
      • London, England, Reino Unido

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 90 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient was a man or woman and 18 to 90 years of age, inclusive.
  2. The patient had CKD and had been on peritoneal dialysis for ≥3 months before enrollment.
  3. The patient was on stable SC epoetin (alfa or beta) maintenance therapy continuously prescribed for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to enrollment.
  4. The patient had 4 consecutive Hb values with a mean ≥10.0 and ≤12.0 g/dL during the screening period, with the difference between the mean of the first confirmed (2 consecutive) Hb values and the mean of the last confirmed (2 consecutive) Hb values being ≤1.0 g/dL.
  5. The patient had 1 ferritin level ≥100 ng/mL within 4 weeks before enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient had known bleeding or coagulation disorder.
  2. The patient had known hematologic disease or cause of anemia other than renal disease (e.g., pure red cell aplasia, homozygous sickle-cell disease, thalassemia, multiple myeloma, hemolytic anemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome).
  3. The patient had received a recent course of intensive iron replacement (i.e., more than 500 mg IV in the 28 days before enrollment).
  4. The patient had advanced chronic congestive heart failure defined by New York Heart Association Class III or IV.
  5. The patient had a known history of seizure disorder or received antiepileptic medication for a seizure disorder within 6 months before enrollment.
  6. The patient had a scheduled kidney transplant. (Note: patients who were currently on a transplant waiting list were not excluded unless there was an identified donor).

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Peginesatida
Peginesatide 0.04 to 0.16 mg/kg, subcutaneous injection, once every 4 weeks for up to 25 weeks. Initial dose based on patient's previous total weekly Epoetin dose, and thereafter could be adjusted to maintain hemoglobin values in the target range of 10 to 12 g/dL and ±1.5 g/dL from Baseline.
Otros nombres:
  • Omontys
  • Hematide
  • AF37702

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Mean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation Period
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and Week 20 to Week 25.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in Hemoglobin between Baseline (the mean of the 4 most recent hemoglobin values prior to Enrollment and the hemoglobin on the day of Enrollment) and the Evaluation Period (mean hemoglobin from Weeks 20 to 25).
Baseline and Week 20 to Week 25.

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Within the Target Range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL During the Evaluation Period
Periodo de tiempo: Week 20 to Week 25.

Mean hemoglobin was calculated from measurements taken during the Evaluation Period (Week 20 to Week 25). The target hemoglobin range was 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL.

The 95% confidence interval was calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.

Week 20 to Week 25.
Percentage of Participants With a Change in Hemoglobin From Baseline to the Evaluation Period Within 1 g/dL
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and Week 20 to Week 25.
Percentage of participants with a mean change in Hemoglobin between Baseline (the mean of the 4 most recent hemoglobin values prior to enrollment and the hemoglobin on the day of enrollment) and the Evaluation Period (mean hemoglobin from measured at Weeks 20 to 25) of less than or equal ± 1 g/dL. The 95% confidence interval was calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Baseline and Week 20 to Week 25.
Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusions
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 25 weeks.
The percentage of participants who received one or more red blood cell transfusions, including packed red blood cells and whole blood transfusions, during the Titration Period (Weeks 1 - 19) and Evaluation Period (Weeks 20 -25). 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction. One patient had the last study visit during the titration period and the transfusion after the titration period. This patient is excluded from the summary of evaluation period.
Up to 25 weeks.
Mean Hemoglobin During 4-week Intervals
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 25 weeks.
Hemoglobin was measured every 2 weeks during the Titration Period (Weeks 1-19) and weekly during the Evaluation Period (Weeks 20-25). One patient did not have central lab hemoglobin value during a regularly scheduled visit during weeks 2-5.
Up to 25 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With Target Hemoglobin of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL by 4-week Intervals
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 25 weeks.
Percentage of participants with mean hemoglobin levels falling between the target level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during 4-week study intervals. Hemoglobin was measured every 2 weeks during the Titration Period (Weeks 1-19) and weekly during the Evaluation Period (Weeks 20-25). 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Up to 25 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With Dose Adjustments During the Study
Periodo de tiempo: From Week 4 to Week 25
The peginesatide dose was adjusted to maintain hemoglobin values in the target range of 10 to 12 g/dL and ±1.5 g/dL from Baseline during the Titration Period (Weeks 1-19) and Evaluation Period (Weeks 20-25). A dose was classified as adjusted if it was not within 20% of the previous dose. A dose was classified as increased or decreased if it was >20% higher or >20% lower respectively, than the previous dose.
From Week 4 to Week 25

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Colaboradores

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de octubre de 2008

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2010

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2010

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

11 de septiembre de 2008

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

12 de septiembre de 2008

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

15 de septiembre de 2008

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

15 de agosto de 2012

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de agosto de 2012

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2012

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • AFX01_201
  • 2008-003458-13 (Número EudraCT)
  • U1111-1114-0301 (Identificador de registro: WHO)

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

3
Suscribir