An Observational Study on RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Clinical Practice in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (TRUST)
30 de abril de 2016 actualizado por: Hoffmann-La Roche
Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated With Tocilizumab in Real Clinical Practice: Effectiveness and Safety (TRUST Study)
This observational study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in clinical practice in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis.
Data will be collected from patients for the 12 months following the first infusion of RoActemra/Actemra.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Terminado
Condiciones
Tipo de estudio
De observación
Inscripción (Actual)
322
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Abruzzo
-
Coppito, Abruzzo, Italia, 67100
-
Pescara, Abruzzo, Italia, 65100
-
-
Calabria
-
Reggio Calabria, Calabria, Italia, 89133
-
-
Campania
-
Avellino, Campania, Italia, 83100
-
Gragnano, Campania, Italia, 80054
-
Napoli, Campania, Italia, 80131
-
Napoli, Campania, Italia, 80138
-
Napoli, Campania, Italia, 80144
-
Salerno, Campania, Italia, 84131
-
Telese Terme, Campania, Italia, 82037
-
-
Emilia-Romagna
-
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italia, 40138
-
Ferrara, Emilia-Romagna, Italia, 44100
-
Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italia, 41100
-
Piacenza, Emilia-Romagna, Italia, 29100
-
-
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
-
Trieste, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italia, 34142
-
-
Lazio
-
Albano Laziale, Lazio, Italia, 00041
-
Roma, Lazio, Italia, 00168
-
Roma, Lazio, Italia, 00152
-
Roma, Lazio, Italia, 00189
-
Roma, Lazio, Italia, 00128
-
Roma, Lazio, Italia, 00145
-
Viterbo, Lazio, Italia, 01100
-
-
Liguria
-
Arenzano, Liguria, Italia, 16011
-
-
Lombardia
-
Castel Goffredo, Lombardia, Italia, 46042
-
Gavardo, Lombardia, Italia, 25085
-
Legnano, Lombardia, Italia, 20025
-
Milano, Lombardia, Italia, 20157
-
Monza, Lombardia, Italia, 20052
-
Pavia, Lombardia, Italia, 27100
-
Rozzano, Lombardia, Italia, 20089
-
Saronno, Lombardia, Italia, 21047
-
Treviglio, Lombardia, Italia, 24047
-
Vimercate, Lombardia, Italia, 20059
-
-
Marche
-
Ancona, Marche, Italia, 60020
-
Jesi, Marche, Italia, 60035
-
-
Molise
-
Agnone, Molise, Italia, 86081
-
-
Piemonte
-
Cuneo, Piemonte, Italia, 12100
-
Novara, Piemonte, Italia, 28100
-
Torino, Piemonte, Italia, 10126
-
-
Puglia
-
Brindisi, Puglia, Italia, 72100
-
Casarano (LE), Puglia, Italia, 73042
-
Foggia, Puglia, Italia, 71100
-
Martina Franca, Puglia, Italia, 74015
-
San Cesario Di Lecce, Puglia, Italia, 73016
-
-
Sardegna
-
Sassari, Sardegna, Italia, 07100
-
-
Sicilia
-
Catania, Sicilia, Italia, 95124
-
Gazzi, Sicilia, Italia, 98125
-
Palermo, Sicilia, Italia, 90127
-
Palermo, Sicilia, Italia, 90146
-
-
Toscana
-
Firenze, Toscana, Italia, 50139
-
Massa, Toscana, Italia, 54100
-
Pisa, Toscana, Italia, 56100
-
Prato, Toscana, Italia, 59100
-
-
Umbria
-
Perugia, Umbria, Italia, 06122
-
-
Veneto
-
Verona, Veneto, Italia, 37126
-
Verona, Veneto, Italia, 37134
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Todos
Método de muestreo
Muestra de probabilidad
Población de estudio
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis initiated on treatment with RoActemra/Actemra
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- Rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
- Initiated on RoActemra/Actemra treatment according to the Summary of Product Characteristics not more than 6 months before opening of study center
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current serious infection
- Hypersensitivity to the active component or any of the excipients
- Pregnant women
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / Cohorte |
|---|
|
Tocilizumab
Participants with moderate to severe Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had received RoActemra [Tocilizumab (TCZ)] treatment for 6 months prior to initiation of study and are inadequate responders to Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors (anti-TNFs) agents were observed.
Participants received treatment with TCZ with dose of 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) body weight, intravenously once every 4 weeks for 12 months according to European Union (EU) approved dosage, and Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity After 6 Months of Treatment
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 12 months
|
Low disease activity is defined as a disease activity score based on 28 joint count (DAS28) score lesser or equal to (</=) 3.2.
The DAS28 is an evaluation index of RA.
DAS28 applies a mathematical formula based on the following parameters: 1. Tender joints count (28 joints), 2. Swollen joints count (28 joints), 3. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C reactive protein (CRP) measurement, 4. Participant's judgement on his own overall health status expressed by a visual analogue scale (VAS).
The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control, scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control, higher scores represent higher disease activity and negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.
Percentage of participants with low disease activity was reported.
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Remission After 6 Months of Treatment
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 12 months
|
Disease remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6.
The DAS28 is an evaluation index of RA.
DAS28 applies a mathematical formula based on the following parameters: 1. Tender joints count (28 joints), 2. Swollen joints count (28 joints), 3. ESR or CRP measurement, 4. Participant's judgment on his own overall health status expressed by a VAS and calculates total score of 0 to approximately 10.
The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control, scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control, higher scores represent higher disease activity and negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.
The response to therapy is defined according to the disease activity detected, compared to the previous clinical evaluation.
Percentage of participants with disease remission was reported.
|
Up to 12 months
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Score of Disease Activity Based on 28 Joint Count in Participants on Monotherapy With Tocilizumab
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Month 0), Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
The DAS28 is an evaluation index of RA.
DAS28 applies a mathematical formula based on the following parameters: 1. Tender joints count (28 joints), 2. Swollen joints count (28 joints), 3.ESR or CRP measurement, 4. Participant's judgment on his own overall health status expressed by a VAS and calculates total score of 0 to approximately 10.
The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control, scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control, higher scores represent higher disease activity and negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.
The response to therapy is defined according to the disease activity detected, compared to the previous clinical evaluation.
|
Baseline (Month 0), Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
|
Mean Score of Fatigue Based on Visual Analogue Scale in Participants on Monotherapy With Tocilizumab
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
VAS for fatigue is a 100 mm scale for participant's assessment of their current level of fatigue.
The '0 'mm corresponds to "no perception of fatigue," '100 mm' is the "maximum level of fatigue that may be perceived."
Mean score of VAS fatigue in participants were reported.
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
|
Mean Score of Health Assessment Questionnaire in Participants on Monotherapy With Tocilizumab
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
The health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) is a participant-completed questionnaire specific for RA, recommended by the American college of Rheumatology for the evaluation of quality of life.
It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 component sets: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities.
There are 4 possible responses for each question: 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do.
To calculate HAQ, the participant must have a component set score for at least 6 of 8 component set.
The HAQ is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of component set that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score of minimum/maximum i.e., 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
|
Number of Participants With Concomitant Medications
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 12 months
|
Number of participants treated with at least one concomitant medication i.e., corticosteroid (Prednisone, Methyl prednisolone) was reported.
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Treatment With Tocilizumab
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 12 months
|
The percentage of participants who prematurely discontinued treatment with TCZ during the study period was reported.
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 12 months
|
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who is administered a study treatment regardless of whether or not the event has a causal relationship with the treatment.
An AE, therefore, could be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the study treatment, whether or not related to the treatment.
A Serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect.
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants Still on Tocilizumab Treatment Till 12 Months After the 1st Infusion
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 12 months
|
Percentage of participants who continued treatment till 12 months after the first infusion with TCZ was reported.
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence and Severity of Synovial Hyperplasia, Joint Effusion and Vascularisation of Second Metacarpo-phalangeal Joint of Right Hand.
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
The presence and severity of synovial hyperplasia (SH) and joint effusion (JE) of second metacarpo-phalangeal (MCP) joint of right hand was determined by ultrasound examination.
According to the method proposed by Naredo, synovial hyperplasia and joint effusion were evaluated based on scoring from 1 to 3 (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = marked).
Vascularization was evaluated with power doppler ultrasound and the score was assessed by a semi quantitative scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0 = normal; 1 = slight, evidence of a single flow signal; 2 = moderate, confluent vessels; 3 = marked, evidence of multiple flow signals in over half the intra articular surface).
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence and Severity of Synovial Hyperplasia, Joint Effusion and Vascularisation of Third Metacarpo-phalangeal Joint of Right Hand.
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
The presence and severity of SH and JE of third MCP joint of right hand was determined by ultrasound examination.
According to the method proposed by Naredo, SH and JE were evaluated based on scoring from 1 to 3 (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = marked).
Vascularization of third MCP joint of right hand was evaluated with power doppler ultrasound and the score was assessed by a semi quantitative scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0 = normal; 1 = slight, evidence of a single flow signal; 2 = moderate, confluent vessels; 3 = marked, evidence of multiple flow signals in over half the intraarticular surface).
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence and Severity of Synovial Hyperplasia, Joint Effusion and Vascularisation of Second Metacarpo-phalangeal Joint of Left Hand
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
The presence and severity of SH and JE of second MCP joint of left hand was determined by ultrasound examination.
According to the method proposed by Naredo, SH and JE were evaluated based on scoring from 1 to 3 (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = marked).
Vascularization of second MCP joint of left hand was evaluated with power doppler ultrasound and the score was assessed by a semi quantitative scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0 = normal; 1 = slight, evidence of a single flow signal; 2 = moderate, confluent vessels; 3 = marked, evidence of multiple flow signals in over half the intra-articular surface).
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence and Severity of Synovial Hyperplasia, Joint Effusion and Vascularisation of Third Metacarpo-phalangeal Joint of Left Hand.
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
The presence and severity of SH and JE of third MCP joint of left hand was determined by ultrasound examination.
According to the method proposed by Naredo, SH and JE were evaluated based on scoring from 1 to 3 (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = marked).
Vascularization of third MCP joint of left hand was evaluated with power doppler ultrasound and the score was assessed by a semi quantitative scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0 = normal; 1 = slight, evidence of a single flow signal; 2 = moderate, confluent vessels; 3 = marked, evidence of multiple flow signals in over half the intra-articular surface).
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
|
Mean Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Score in the Participants With Inadequate Response to Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs and Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors Agents
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
The DAS28 index applies a mathematical formula based on the following parameters: 1. Tender joints count (28 joints), 2. Swollen joints count (28 joints) 3. ESR or CRP measurement, 4. Participant's judgment on his own overall health status expressed by a VAS and calculates total score of 0 to approximately 10.
The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control, scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control.
The response to therapy is defined according to the disease activity detected, compared to the previous clinical evaluation.
The mean DAS28 scores were evaluated after the first infusion of TCZ in two different sub populations: participants with inadequate response (IR) to DMARD (DMARD-IR: group A) or to DMARD and anti-TNF drugs (DMARD + anti-TNF-IR: group B).
Data allowing the evaluation of DAS28 was available for 81 participants in DMARD-IR group and 203 participants in DMARD + anti-TNF-IR group.
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
|
Mean Score of Fatigue Based on Visual Analogue Scale in the Participants With Inadequate Response to Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs and Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors Agents
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
VAS for fatigue is a 100 mm scale for participant's assessment of their current level of fatigue: 0 mm corresponds to "no perception of fatigue"; 100 mm is the "maximum that may be perceived".
The mean VAS fatigue scores were evaluated after the first infusion of TCZ in two different sub populations, classified according to the previous pharmacological treatment: participants with inadequate response to DMARD (DMARD-IR: group A) or to DMARD and anti-TNF drugs (DMARD + anti-TNF-IR: group B).
Data allowing the evaluation of fatigue (VAS) was available for 45 participants in DMARD-IR group and 113 participants in DMARD + anti-TNF-IR group.
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
|
Mean Score of Health Assessment Questionnaire in the Participants With Inadequate Response to Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs and Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors Agents
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
The HAQ is a participant-completed questionnaire specific for RA, recommended by the American college of Rheumatology for the evaluation of quality of life.
It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 component sets: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities.
There are 4 possible responses for each question: 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do.
To calculate HAQ, participant must have a component set score for at least 6 of 8 component set.
The HAQ is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of component set that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
Data allowing the evaluation of HAQ was available for 73 participants in DMARD-IR group and 157 participants in DMARD + anti-TNF-IR group.
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 12
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio
1 de mayo de 2011
Finalización primaria (Actual)
1 de abril de 2013
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
1 de abril de 2013
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
13 de julio de 2011
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
13 de julio de 2011
Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)
14 de julio de 2011
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Estimar)
7 de junio de 2016
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
30 de abril de 2016
Última verificación
1 de abril de 2016
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- ML25728
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .