Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Can we Better Understand the Development of VAP and Eventually Predict and Prevent it?

2 de diciembre de 2014 actualizado por: Prof. Jacques SCHRENZEL, University Hospital, Geneva

Culture Versus Genomics: Study of Oropharyngeal and Tracheal Flora in Intubated Patients. Can we Better Understand the Development of Ventilator-Acquired Pneumonia (VAP) and Predict Its Causing Pathogen(s)?

Pathogens of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) come from colonizers of the trachea. The hypothesis of the investigators is that during the first days of intubation, independently of the use of antibiotics, there is a change in the oro-pharyngeal flora leading to the selection of one pathogen in the trachea, that will finally be the cause of VAP.

The investigators designed a prospective study including 300 patients intubated for more than 3 days, with daily analysis of oro-pharyngeal juice and tracheal aspirate by culture and metagenomics, in order to determine if this microbiological surveillance permits:

  1. To predict a high risk to develop a VAP in the next 48h and even to predict its agent
  2. To better understand the development of VAP by studying the evolution of the "respiratory flora" in the context of intubation

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Descripción detallada

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY:

The ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is responsible for almost half of infections acquired in intensive care, affecting up to 28% of mechanically ventilated patients with a mortality rate ranging from 25 to 50%. The majority of these VAP originate in the sub-glottic juice that accumulates just above the endotracheal tube cuff. Many preventive measures exist and are applied in this institution, including oropharyngeal aspiration every 4 hours and tracheal aspirates every 8 hours. Currently, these aspirates are simply discarded. However, a French study evaluating the colonization and infection of the respiratory tract of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has highlighted that the causative agent of VAP is selected in more than 2/3 of the cases in tracheal aspirates several days before the VAP. This suggest that "microbiological surveillance" of daily aspirates may permit the identification of a selected respiratory pathogen later responsible of VAP.

Parallel to this, the rapid development of genomics has highlighted the role of flora (microbiota) and its link with disease (eg, colitis and intestinal microbiota inflammatory). This area is also emerging in the field of respiratory tract infections, for example in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma. There is no description yet of metagenomics changes in respiratory flora of patients intubated with or without VAP, neither evaluation of the benefits of such an approach in relation to classical microbiology. The investigators believe that studying the respiratory flora of ventilated patients could provide clues to better understand the development of VAP.

METHODOLOGY (plan, inclusion and objectives):

Prospective study of 300 intubated patients recruited during a period of 2 years, in whom tracheal aspirates and oropharyngeal juice collected daily will be analyzed by culture and metagenomics, instead of being simply discarded. The results of these analyzes will be used only for research purposes (culture and metagenomics in parallel).

The main objective is to determine whether daily monitoring of oropharyngeal juice and tracheal aspirates by culture identifies the selection of a pathogen among the colonizing flora, which would be predictive of the onset of VAP in 48-72 hours.

The secondary objectives are to obtain new knowledge on the kinetics of colonization and respiratory infections in intubated patients, compare the advantages and disadvantages of a metagenomic approach compared to culture in this context, and study the influence of antibiotherapy in this context.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

286

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Geneva, Suiza, 1201
        • University Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

ICU adult patients intubated in the last 24h for a condition that will probably require more than 3 days of mechanical ventilation.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient hospitalised in the adult ICU of HUG (>18 years old)
  • Intubated for < 24 hours
  • Expected duration of intubation > 4 days (e.g. neurologic disease)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients for whom regular tracheal aspirations cannot not be performed (because of unstable intracranial pressure, for example).
  • New antibiotic therapy in the week preceding the intubation

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Percentage of cases where tracheal (same for oropharyngeal) aspirate clearly showing a selection of the same pathogen retrieved later in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), when VAP happens.
Periodo de tiempo: After 18 months
This will provide the sensitivity of tracheal culture to identify correctly the agent of VAP before VAP happens.
After 18 months
Percentage of case where the pathogen selected in tracheal (same for oropharyngeal) aspirate do not correspond to the agent of VAP as identified by BAL.
Periodo de tiempo: After 18 months
Helps to determine the "specificity" of tracheal aspirates to predict the agent of VAP.
After 18 months
Percentage of cases where despite the selection of only one pathogen in tracheal aspirate (same for oropharyngeal) aspirate, the patient did never suffer from VAP
Periodo de tiempo: After 18 months
Helps determining the positive and negative predictive values of tracheal aspirates to predict VAP.
After 18 months
Presence of Ventilator-Associated-Pneumonia (VAP)
Periodo de tiempo: After 18 month
After 18 month

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Percentage of VAP in the study population
Periodo de tiempo: After 18 months
After 18 months
Type of bacteria retrieved on intubation day compared to type of bacteria retrieved after 1 week of intubation
Periodo de tiempo: After 18 months

The investigators expect to find normal oropharyngeal flora on intubation day but Gram negative pathogens after one week, despite the absence of antibiotherapy.

This will be compared with and without antibiotherapy.

After 18 months
Evolution of metagenomics of oropharyngeal - tracheal aspirates in cases (VAP) and control (no VAP)
Periodo de tiempo: After 18 months
For patients suffering from VAP, metagenomics will also be assessed in the BAL. This will give the investigators some clues on the "respiratory flora" equilibrium and its evolution in cases and control
After 18 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Jacques Schrenzel, Prof., University Hospital, Geneva

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de octubre de 2012

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2014

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2014

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

15 de marzo de 2013

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

11 de junio de 2013

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

12 de junio de 2013

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

3 de diciembre de 2014

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de diciembre de 2014

Última verificación

1 de diciembre de 2014

Más información

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

3
Suscribir