Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Long-term Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT)

2 de agosto de 2017 actualizado por: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Long-term Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT): a 3-year Follow up

Aim of the current study is to investigate the long-term efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT) and to explore whether previously observed effects at the 6-month follow-up of a randomized, controlled, assessor-blind, parallel group trial are maintained at the 3-year follow-up.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Descripción detallada

Dissemination of treatment for depression is still unsatisfying: every second patient does not receive, refuses, or is waiting for treatment. Moreover, with a drop-out rate of almost 25% in routine clinical practice, and a 54% relapse rate for treatment responders within the two years after treatment termination, improving treatment is necessary. Metacognitive Training for depression (D-MCT), a low threshold, easy to administer group intervention was designed to fill this gap. It aims at the reduction of depressive symptoms by changing cognitive biases; not only biases targeted in cognitive behavioral therapy but also those identified by basic research. It was positively evaluated with regard to feasibility and acceptance in a non-randomized pilot study. Moreover, efficacy of D-MCT was suggested in a randomized controlled trail (RCT) in comparison to an active control intervention (Jelinek et al., in press). In this trial patients with depressive disorder were completing a psychosomatic outpatient treatment program and were randomly assigned to either D-MCT or general health training. Severity of depression and cognitive biases were assessed at baseline (t0), post treatment (t1) and 6 months (t2) later by raters blind to diagnostic status. Intention-to-treat analyses demonstrated that at the end of treatment, as well as 6 months later, improvement in depression was significantly greater in the D-MCT relative to the health training group at medium effect sizes. A significantly greater number of patients in the D-MCT group were in remission at 6-month follow-up. Moreover, the decrease in cognitive biases and increase in psychological well-being/quality of life was larger in the D-MCT than the health training group over time. Aim of the current study is to investigate the long-term efficacy of D-MCT. For this purpose, an additional 3 year follow-up assessment (t3) is conducted. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS, 17-item version) total score serves as the primary outcome. Self-assessed depression, dysfunctional beliefs, self-esteem, quality of life, and ability to work serve as secondary outcomes.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

84

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Hamburg, Alemania, 20246
        • University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 65 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria for the current study are:

  • informed consent
  • intention-to-treat-sample of the study Evaluation of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MKT) in psychosomatic rehabilitation, DRKS-ID: DRKS00007907 (see Jelinek et al., in press, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics)
  • age between 18 and 65 years
  • diagnosis of a single episode or recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) or dysthymia (verified by the MINI).

The exclusion criteria were:

  • lifetime psychotic symptoms (i.e., hallucinations, delusions, or mania), suicidality (Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised ≥ 7), intellectual disability (estimated IQ < 70).

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: D-MCT Group
Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT), 8 sessions (60min); twice a week over a period of 4 weeks. Metacognitive Training for depression (D-MCT) is a low-threshold, easy to administer group intervention. It aims at the reduction of depressive symptoms by changing cognitive biases; not only biases targeted in cognitive behavioral therapy but also those identified by basic research.
Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT), 8 sessions (60min); twice a week over a period of 4 weeks. Metacognitive Training for depression (D-MCT) is a low-threshold, easy to administer group intervention. It aims at the reduction of depressive symptoms by changing cognitive biases; not only biases targeted in cognitive behavioral therapy but also those identified by basic research.
Otros nombres:
  • Entrenamiento metacognitivo para la depresión
Comparador activo: Health Training Group
Health Training Group (Walking/ Psychoeducation on health); 8 sessions (60min), twice a week over a period of 4 weeks
Health Training Group (Walking/ Psychoeducation on health); 8 sessions (60min), twice a week over a period of 4 weeks

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Periodo de tiempo: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Primary outcome is change on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS, 17-item version) from baseline to follow-up (t0 - t3)
3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Self-assessed depression
Periodo de tiempo: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Change in self-assessed depression as measured by the Beck-Depression Inventory (BDI) from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Dysfunctional beliefs
Periodo de tiempo: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Change in dysfunctional beliefs as measured by the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS) from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs
Periodo de tiempo: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Change in metacognitive beliefs as measured by the Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ-30) from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Quality of life
Periodo de tiempo: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Change in quality of life as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL-BREF) from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Work status
Periodo de tiempo: at 3-year follow-up (t3)
Work status (full or part-time employment, unemployed, house wife/husband, student, on sick leave, retired) at T3 assessment
at 3-year follow-up (t3)
Self-esteem
Periodo de tiempo: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Change in self-esteem as measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) from from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Remission rate
Periodo de tiempo: at 3-year follow up (t3)
Remission rate at T3 as measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS score ≤ 8)
at 3-year follow up (t3)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Lena Jelinek, PD Dr., Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de marzo de 2016

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2017

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2017

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

5 de abril de 2016

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

12 de mayo de 2016

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

13 de mayo de 2016

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

3 de agosto de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de agosto de 2017

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2017

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 1027/106

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir