Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Long-term Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT)

2. August 2017 aktualisiert von: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Long-term Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT): a 3-year Follow up

Aim of the current study is to investigate the long-term efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT) and to explore whether previously observed effects at the 6-month follow-up of a randomized, controlled, assessor-blind, parallel group trial are maintained at the 3-year follow-up.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Dissemination of treatment for depression is still unsatisfying: every second patient does not receive, refuses, or is waiting for treatment. Moreover, with a drop-out rate of almost 25% in routine clinical practice, and a 54% relapse rate for treatment responders within the two years after treatment termination, improving treatment is necessary. Metacognitive Training for depression (D-MCT), a low threshold, easy to administer group intervention was designed to fill this gap. It aims at the reduction of depressive symptoms by changing cognitive biases; not only biases targeted in cognitive behavioral therapy but also those identified by basic research. It was positively evaluated with regard to feasibility and acceptance in a non-randomized pilot study. Moreover, efficacy of D-MCT was suggested in a randomized controlled trail (RCT) in comparison to an active control intervention (Jelinek et al., in press). In this trial patients with depressive disorder were completing a psychosomatic outpatient treatment program and were randomly assigned to either D-MCT or general health training. Severity of depression and cognitive biases were assessed at baseline (t0), post treatment (t1) and 6 months (t2) later by raters blind to diagnostic status. Intention-to-treat analyses demonstrated that at the end of treatment, as well as 6 months later, improvement in depression was significantly greater in the D-MCT relative to the health training group at medium effect sizes. A significantly greater number of patients in the D-MCT group were in remission at 6-month follow-up. Moreover, the decrease in cognitive biases and increase in psychological well-being/quality of life was larger in the D-MCT than the health training group over time. Aim of the current study is to investigate the long-term efficacy of D-MCT. For this purpose, an additional 3 year follow-up assessment (t3) is conducted. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS, 17-item version) total score serves as the primary outcome. Self-assessed depression, dysfunctional beliefs, self-esteem, quality of life, and ability to work serve as secondary outcomes.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

84

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

      • Hamburg, Deutschland, 20246
        • University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 65 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria for the current study are:

  • informed consent
  • intention-to-treat-sample of the study Evaluation of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MKT) in psychosomatic rehabilitation, DRKS-ID: DRKS00007907 (see Jelinek et al., in press, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics)
  • age between 18 and 65 years
  • diagnosis of a single episode or recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) or dysthymia (verified by the MINI).

The exclusion criteria were:

  • lifetime psychotic symptoms (i.e., hallucinations, delusions, or mania), suicidality (Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised ≥ 7), intellectual disability (estimated IQ < 70).

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: D-MCT Group
Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT), 8 sessions (60min); twice a week over a period of 4 weeks. Metacognitive Training for depression (D-MCT) is a low-threshold, easy to administer group intervention. It aims at the reduction of depressive symptoms by changing cognitive biases; not only biases targeted in cognitive behavioral therapy but also those identified by basic research.
Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT), 8 sessions (60min); twice a week over a period of 4 weeks. Metacognitive Training for depression (D-MCT) is a low-threshold, easy to administer group intervention. It aims at the reduction of depressive symptoms by changing cognitive biases; not only biases targeted in cognitive behavioral therapy but also those identified by basic research.
Andere Namen:
  • Metakognitives Training für Depressionen
Aktiver Komparator: Health Training Group
Health Training Group (Walking/ Psychoeducation on health); 8 sessions (60min), twice a week over a period of 4 weeks
Health Training Group (Walking/ Psychoeducation on health); 8 sessions (60min), twice a week over a period of 4 weeks

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Zeitfenster: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Primary outcome is change on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS, 17-item version) from baseline to follow-up (t0 - t3)
3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Self-assessed depression
Zeitfenster: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Change in self-assessed depression as measured by the Beck-Depression Inventory (BDI) from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Dysfunctional beliefs
Zeitfenster: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Change in dysfunctional beliefs as measured by the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS) from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs
Zeitfenster: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Change in metacognitive beliefs as measured by the Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ-30) from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Quality of life
Zeitfenster: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Change in quality of life as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL-BREF) from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Work status
Zeitfenster: at 3-year follow-up (t3)
Work status (full or part-time employment, unemployed, house wife/husband, student, on sick leave, retired) at T3 assessment
at 3-year follow-up (t3)
Self-esteem
Zeitfenster: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Change in self-esteem as measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) from from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Remission rate
Zeitfenster: at 3-year follow up (t3)
Remission rate at T3 as measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS score ≤ 8)
at 3-year follow up (t3)

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Lena Jelinek, PD Dr., Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. März 2016

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Mai 2017

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Mai 2017

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

5. April 2016

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

12. Mai 2016

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

13. Mai 2016

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

3. August 2017

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

2. August 2017

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2017

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 1027/106

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Unipolare Depression

Klinische Studien zur D-MCT

3
Abonnieren