Comparison of the Dual Task, Cognitive Skills and Physical Activity With Problematic Game Players and Control Subjects
27 de abril de 2021 actualizado por: Cagtay Maden, Çağtay Maden
This study was conducted to compare the cognitive skills, dual-task and physical activity status of individuals who play problem video games and healthy individuals, and to determine how much these skills are affected.
The cognitive skills of individuals with video game playing problems and the control group were evaluated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test, the Trail Making Test A & B sections, and the Stroop test.
I evaluated dual tasks with 10-meter walking test (single-double task) and Time Up and Go Test (single-double task).
Physical activity levels were evaluated by International Physical Active Questionnaire.
The average cognitive skills, dual tasks, and physical activity levels of the individuals in both groups were compared.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Terminado
Intervención / Tratamiento
Tipo de estudio
De observación
Inscripción (Actual)
60
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Şahinbey
-
Gaziantep, Şahinbey, Pavo
- Hasan Kalyoncu Universty
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
18 años a 35 años (Adulto)
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Sí
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Todos
Método de muestreo
Muestra no probabilística
Población de estudio
University students in Hasan Kalyoncu University
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- DSM V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, revision 5) Internet Gaming Disorder (IOOB) Diagnostic criteria: Providing 5 out of 9 items
- No communication barrier
- To volunteer to participate in research
- Be playing games at least 2 hours a day in the last year
Exclusion Criteria:
- 3 days a week to be doing any sports
- Having a chronic illness
- Psychological disease diagnosis
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / Cohorte |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
sujetos de control
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test, Trail Making Test (TMT) A & B sections and Stroop test for cognitive ability assessment, 10 meter walking test (single-double task) for dual task, Time up and Go test (single-double task), physical International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used for activity and The Exercise Benefit / Barriers Scale was used for exercise perception.
|
|
problematic video game player
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test, Trail Making Test (TMT) A & B sections and Stroop test for cognitive ability assessment, 10 meter walking test (single-double task) for dual task, Time up and Go test (single-double task), physical International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used for activity and The Exercise Benefit / Barriers Scale was used for exercise perception.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Periodo de tiempo: 1 days
|
It was used to evaluate the physical activities of individuals in the last week.
It was also used to assess individuals' sedentary time.
|
1 days
|
|
The Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
This scale is used to measure exercise benefit perception.
a high score indicates the presence of positive exercise perception.
High scores on this scale indicate that the perception of obstacles to exercise is at the forefront.
|
1 day
|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was developed as a rapid screening test for mild cognitive impairment.
|
1 day
|
|
Trail Making Test (TMT) A & B sections
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
It is one of the neuropsychological tests widely used all over the world.
TMT is a test that requires visual-spatial processing and motor skills, which measures executive functions such as working memory, complex attention, planning, and set changes.
|
1 day
|
|
Stroop Test
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
It is a test that measures the ability to inhibition of inappropriate response in executive functions.
It is a test that shows frontal functions that measures attention under a disruptive effect and evaluates to suppress inappropriate automatic responses.
|
1 day
|
|
10 meter walking test
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
the 10-meter walking test, subjects are walked at their own normal speed and the walking time is measured with a stopwatch and recorded in m / sec.
In the beginning, the 2-meter assembling phase is accepted as the 2-meter deceleration phase at the end of the walk, and measurement is made on a 14-meter-long track.
In our study, normal walking speed and dual walking speed were measured and recorded separately, accompanied by dual tasks.
In the evaluation of dual walking speed, individuals were asked to count animal names starting with the letter "K" and walking speed was recorded.
|
1 day
|
|
Timed Up & Go (TUG) test
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
Timed Up & Go (TUG) test was used to evaluate functional mobility.
Patients are asked to get up from the chair they are sitting in, walk 3 meters, turn back and sit on the chair again.
Again, to evaluate the dual test, say words starting with the letter "N", the test is repeated and the time is recorded.
|
1 day
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
1 de enero de 2020
Finalización primaria (Actual)
1 de marzo de 2021
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
29 de marzo de 2021
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
22 de abril de 2021
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
22 de abril de 2021
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
27 de abril de 2021
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
29 de abril de 2021
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
27 de abril de 2021
Última verificación
1 de abril de 2021
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 2019/112
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .