Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Using Illusions to Boost Social Cognition (SOLLUSIONS)

19 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Hôpital le Vinatier

Socio-cognitive Benefits of Exposure to Visual Illusions in Patients With Psychotic Disorders

This study aims to explore whether the observation of complex visual objects can help improve social cognition in people living with psychotic disorders. Social cognition refers to the ability to understand what others think, feel, or intend, and plays a key role in social relationships and daily interactions.

Main questions this study aims to answer:

  • Does dyadic exposure to complex visual objects improve mental state attribution, as measured by the Faux Pas Test?
  • Does the intervention enhance related domains of social cognition, including implicit intention inference (Hinting Task), interpretation of complex interactions (Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition, MASC), and reduction of hostile attribution biases (Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire, AIHQ)?
  • Are improvements maintained after one month, and do patients who receive the intervention later (waitlist group) show the same benefits once exposed?

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

This study is a randomized, controlled, monocentric trial evaluating a novel sensory-motor rehabilitation approach for social cognition. The study is based on the hypothesis that perception is interpretative and viewpoint-dependent, and that realizing this through concrete experience could generalize to higher-level cognitive processes required for social understanding.

Participants will attend three visits and complete questionnaires and tasks that assess social understanding before and after the activity, and again one month later.

Two groups will take part: one completing the workshop shortly after inclusion, and one completing it after a delay, allowing comparison over time. Participants will be randomized in one condition.

This research does not involve medication. It consists of simple tasks such as observing and describing visual stimuli, followed by a facilitated discussion.

Neuropsychological tests and questionnaires will be used to measure changes over time.

Expected impact: By inducing concrete perspective-shifts, the intervention aims to improve mentalizing, reduce egocentric biases, and strengthen interpretation of social cues. This bottom-up sensory-motor approach may overcome limitations of classical cognitive remediation programs by promoting deep experiential learning rather than top-down instruction.

If effective, the method may support long-term social reintegration, psychosocial functioning, and inspire wider clinical applications due to its low cost, ease of deployment, and strong ecological engagement.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

60

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Bron, Francia, 69678
        • CH le Vinatier
        • Investigador principal:
          • Frédéric HAESEBAERT, MD, PhD

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 to 40 years
  • Fluent French speaker
  • Has provided written informed consent
  • For individuals under guardianship (curatorship): inclusion is permitted if the curator is available to assist or advise when needed.
  • Established diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, or brief psychotic disorder according to theDiagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5-TR) criteria
  • Presence of social cognition impairment, defined by:subjective complaint reported by the participant or identified by care teams regarding difficulties in social interaction and clinical confirmation of observable difficulties (e.g., social withdrawal, misinterpretation of others' intentions, inappropriate social behaviour)
  • Membership or entitlement to a social security plan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical state incompatible with participation in group-based activities (e.g., severe psychomotor agitation, severe behavioural disturbance)
  • Concurrent participation in another social cognition remediation program
  • Diagnosis of intellectual disability
  • Insufficient comprehension of French for verbal interaction and test completion
  • Significant change in psychotropic medication within the past month
  • Uncorrectable visual impairment preventing participation
  • Pregnant women
  • Individuals under full guardianship (tutorship)

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Cuidados de apoyo
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Immediate intervention
Participants receive the visual-perception session shortly after baseline assessment. They complete neurocognitive and social cognition tests before exposure, immediately after, and again at one-month follow-up.

A guided session of approximately 45 minutes. The core rehabilitation tool consists of multiple-perspective illusion boxes. Each participant stands on one side of the box and perceives a different shape than their partner. The session unfolds in 3 structured phases:

  1. For each illusion : Participants observe objects silently and draw what they see.
  2. Perspective confrontation + Card selection: Drawings and interpretation cards are exchanged and discussed.
  3. Perspective switching : Participants swap positions to reveal the alternative visual interpretation.

The session is followed by a short structured discussion with a psychologist focused on perspective-taking and interpretation of social cues.

Comparador activo: Delayed Intervention (Wait-list Control)
Participants complete the same assessments as Arm 1 but receive the intervention only after a waiting period. This arm allows comparison between natural progression and workshop effects prior to exposure.
A guided session of approximately 45 minutes. The core rehabilitation tool consists of multiple-perspective illusion boxes. Each participant stands on one side of the box and perceives a different shape than their partner. The session unfolds in 3 structured phases: 1. For each illusion : Participants observe objects silently and draw what they see. 2. Perspective confrontation + Card selection: Drawings and interpretation cards are exchanged and discussed. 3. Perspective switching : Participants swap positions to reveal the alternative visual interpretation. The session is followed by a short structured discussion with a psychologist focused on perspective-taking and interpretation of social cues. Delivered after a delay following baseline assessment.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
"Faux Pas" test total score
Periodo de tiempo: Change from pre to post intervention (up to 3 hours)
  1. Total of correctly recognised "Faux Pas" Score range : 0 - 30 Minimum (0) : no correct detection of faux pas Maximum (30) : all faux pas correctly detected
  2. Total of identified absence of "Faux Pas" Score range : 0 - 10 Minimum (0) : incorrectly identifies absence of faux pas Maximum (10) : correctly identifies absence of faux pas
  3. Total score of control question comprehension Score range : 0 - 20 Minimum (0) : poor comprehension Maximum (20) : Full comprehension
Change from pre to post intervention (up to 3 hours)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Hinting Task
Periodo de tiempo: Change from pre to post intervention (up to 3 hours)
  1. Number of correctly inferred items with hint 1 Score range : 0 - 20 Minimum (0) : No correct inference of intentions Maximum (20) : All intentions correctly inferred
  2. Number of correctly inferred items with hint 2 Score range : 0 - 20 Minimum (0) : No correct inference of intentions Maximum (20) : All intentions correctly inferred
Change from pre to post intervention (up to 3 hours)
MASC performance
Periodo de tiempo: Change from pre intervention to follow-up session (up to a month and a half)
Number of correct responses Score range 0 - 45 Minimum (0) : No correct mental state inference Maximum (45) : All mental states correctly inferred
Change from pre intervention to follow-up session (up to a month and a half)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Colaboradores

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de julio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de enero de 2029

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de febrero de 2029

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

12 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

19 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

22 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

22 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

19 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

Descripción del plan IPD

Anonymized IPD that underlie results in a publication may be shared upon reasonable scientific request following publication of study results.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

IPD available after publication of primary results

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

Requests must be made by qualified researchers for scientific purposes. Data will be shared under controlled access agreement ensuring privacy and ethical standards.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir