Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Dry Cupping Therapy and Muscle Energy Technique on Upper Crossed Syndrome

17 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Abdelrahman Ahmed Tarek

Effect of Combined Dry Cupping Therapy and Muscle Energy Technique on Upper Crossed Syndrome Patients. A Randomized Control Study

This study evaluated and compared the therapeutic efficacy of combining Dry Cupping therapy with the Muscle Energy Technique (MET) against each intervention applied independently, focusing on three core parameters: Neck Disability Index (NDI), Craniovertebral Angle (CVA), and Sagittal Shoulder-C7 Angle (SSA).

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

This study evaluated and compared the therapeutic efficacy of combining Dry Cupping therapy with the Muscle Energy Technique (MET) against each intervention applied independently, focusing on three core parameters: Neck Disability Index (NDI), Craniovertebral Angle (CVA), and Sagittal Shoulder-C7 Angle (SSA).

Methods: A pre-test post-test double-blinded randomized controlled trial design was employed. Seventy-six adults (aged 20-40 years) diagnosed with UCS were randomly allocated into four equal experimental groups (n = 19 per group): Group A received combined dry cupping and MET with conventional therapy; Group B received dry cupping with conventional therapy; Group C received MET with conventional therapy; and Group D received conventional therapy alone. Interventions were conducted over an 8-week period. Primary outcomes included functional impairment via the Arabic version of the NDI, and objective sagittal alignment parameters (CVA and SSA) measured using precision photometry via the Kinovea software application.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

76

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Giza, Egipto
        • Cairo University

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant inclusion was restricted to individuals between 20 and 40 years of age.
  • The exact diagnostic criteria required a baseline craniovertebral angle (CVA) of less than 48 degrees.
  • a sagittal shoulder-C7 angle (SSA) of less than 52 degrees.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute post-surgical conditions
  • structural spinal deformities (e.g., severe fixed structural scoliosis)
  • cervical radiculopathy, or localized dermal infections contradicting cupping application.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Group A (Combined group)
Group A (Combined group): This group of nineteen subjects received combined dry cupping therapy, Muscle energy techniques, and conventional physical therapy.

19 subjects received combined dry cupping therapy, Muscle energy technique, and conventional physical therapy for eight weeks.

  1. Dry cupping was applied to the regional hypertonic target sites. Standard plastic cups ranging from 25 to 50 mm were placed directly over each subject's levator scapulae trigger point (SI-14) and upper trapezius trigger point (GB-21) bilaterally. The treatment duration was set at exactly 8 minutes per session.
  2. Muscle Energy Technique The Post-Isometric Relaxation (PIR) manual protocol targeted the hypertonic muscles of the upper crossed syndrome quadrant, including the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid, scalenes, and suboccipital groups. Participants were placed in a supine position on the treatment table with their head free from the edge of the plinth, supported by the physical therapist.
  3. conventional physical therapy treatment
Experimental: Group B (Cupping group)
Group B (Cupping group): This group of nineteen subjects received dry cupping therapy and conventional physical therapy.

19 subjects received combined dry cupping therapy and conventional physical therapy for eight weeks.

  1. Dry cupping was applied to the regional hypertonic target sites. Standard plastic cups ranging from 25 to 50 mm were placed directly over each subject's levator scapulae trigger point (SI-14) and upper trapezius trigger point (GB-21) bilaterally. The treatment duration was set at exactly 8 minutes per session.
  2. conventional physical therapy treatment
Experimental: Group C (MET group)
Group C (MET group): This group of nineteen subjects received Muscle energy techniques and conventional physical therapy.

19 subjects received combined Muscle energy technique, and conventional physical therapy for eight weeks.

  1. Muscle Energy Technique The Post-Isometric Relaxation (PIR) manual protocol targeted the hypertonic muscles of the upper crossed syndrome quadrant, including the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid, scalenes, and suboccipital groups. Participants were placed in a supine position on the treatment table with their head free from the edge of the plinth, supported by the physical therapist.
  2. conventional physical therapy treatment
Comparador activo: Group D (Control group)
Group D (Control group): This group of nineteen subjects received conventional physical therapy alone
19 subjects received only conventional physical therapy for eight weeks.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline and re assessed following 8 weeks
Perceived functional limitations resulting from regional impairment were measured using the validated Arabic version of the NDI questionnaire. This instrument evaluates 10 clinical sections (including activities of daily living, concentration, and pain profiles) scored from 0 to 5 per item, yielding a cumulative score out of 50. Higher aggregate indices represent greater functional disability.
At baseline and re assessed following 8 weeks
craniovertebral angle (CVA)
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline and re assessed following 8 weeks
This biomechanical index reflects the architectural severity of forward head posture. It is defined as the angle formed between a horizontal line drawn through the spinous process of C7 and an intersecting line extending from the tragus of the ear to the C7 landmark. CVA was measured using precision digital photogrammetry via the Kinovea software application.
At baseline and re assessed following 8 weeks
Sagittal Shoulder-C7 Angle (SSA)
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline and re assessed following 8 weeks
This geometric marker quantifies shoulder roundedness and anterior protraction. It is formed by the intersection of a horizontal reference line passing through the lateral aspect of the acromion with a line drawn from the C7 spinous process to the lateral acromion. SSA was measured using precision digital photogrammetry via the Kinovea software application.
At baseline and re assessed following 8 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

18 de junio de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

30 de junio de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

13 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

17 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

22 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

17 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir