- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07683819
Personalized Normative Feedback for Stigma and Help-seeking
31 de agosto de 2026 actualizado por: Han Oh
Developing a Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention to Increase Help-seeking for Suicidal Thoughts
People tend to care about what others think and often change our behaviors accordingly.
But what if people do not have an accurate understanding of what others really think?
Stigma is pervasive, especially in the Black and Asian American communities, which can prevent people from seeking help.
This study explores whether correcting misperceptions (by showing what people really think) about depression and suicide can increase help-seeking behaviors among Black and Asian emerging adults who have untreated depression and suicidal thoughts.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Aún no reclutando
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Suicide rates have increased for Black and Asian American emerging adults in California, untreated depression contributes to this concerning trend.
A major deterrent to treatment utilization is stigma, which has been known to decrease help-seeking behaviors.
Black and Asian American communities have been known to have higher levels of mental health stigma than their white counterparts.
People with untreated depression and suicidal thoughts often turn to the internet for help, meaning online interventions can play a crucial role in nudging individuals toward help-seeking.
Personalized Normative Feedback (PNF) is one such intervention that has been widely used to modify a range of health behaviors.
The premise of PNF is that people generally hold exaggerated views about what their peers deem acceptable (i.e., perceived social norms), which in turn influences behavior.
However, perceptions that are so often passively accepted can be challenged with gentle confrontation.
PNF actively corrects these views by providing accurate information about what people actually think is acceptable, thus re-routing the social pressure toward conformity to the healthier behavior.
Working closely with a community advisory board, we use survey data we collected on social norms from Black and Asian American emerging adults aged (18-29) and explore the extent to which presenting these social norms can increase help-seeking intentions and behaviors.
This study will identify Black (N=80) and Asian American (N=80) emerging adults with untreated depression and/or recent suicidal ideation but have expressed no intention to seek help, and within each racial group, randomly assign half to a PNF treatment and half to the control condition.
This study will test whether the PNF intervention will decrease stigma, increase intention to seek treatment, and one month later, test whether the intervention led to help-seeking behaviors.
This study will also collect survey data on the acceptability, safety, and feasibility of PNF.
If efficacious, the researchers expect to be able to administer this cost-effective, quick, and easy intervention to thousands of individuals to reduce stigma and increase help-seeking.
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Estimado)
160
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Hans Oh, PhD
- Número de teléfono: (213) 821-1382
- Correo electrónico: hansoh@usc.edu
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, Estados Unidos, 90089
- USC School of Social Work
-
Contacto:
- Sarah Cho, MA
- Número de teléfono: 213 821 7404
- Correo electrónico: chohyun@usc.edu
-
Investigador principal:
- Hans Y. Oh, PhD
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Sí
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 18-29
- Asian American
- Black American
- Suicidal ideation
- Depression
- Not currently in treatment
- English speaking
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Prevención
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Único
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PNF Treatment
In this survey experiment, participants will receive information on the social norms data, such as information about whether other people would be friends with someone in mental health treatment.
|
Presenting participants with information about their perceptions of social norms, and actual data on social norms, while highlighting discrepancies, and gently confronting participants toward behavioral changes.
|
|
Comparador activo: Control
An attention control (presenting information about artificial intelligence)
|
The participants will engage in an activity online for the same duration as the intervention.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants who express intention to to seek help
Periodo de tiempo: Since the intervention occurs on a single day, the assessment will take place at baseline, and then immediately following the intervention (post-test), and then 30 days after as a follow-up assessment.
|
Participants will rate their intention to seek help from 12 different sources (e.g., family member, partner, pastor, friend, 9-8-8); each source will be rated using an four category ordinal item ranging from 'definitely won't do this' to 'definitely will do this'.
|
Since the intervention occurs on a single day, the assessment will take place at baseline, and then immediately following the intervention (post-test), and then 30 days after as a follow-up assessment.
|
|
Number of participants who engage engage in help-seeking behaviors
Periodo de tiempo: 30 day follow-up
|
Actually contacting one of 12 sources of help, including contacting a provider, talking to a friend, talking to a pastor, calling 9-8-8.
|
30 day follow-up
|
|
Perceived public stigma
Periodo de tiempo: The intervention takes place on a single day, and so the assessments will occur at baseline and immediately following the intervention (post-test) on the same day, and then 30-day follow-up.
|
The Discrimination and Devaluation Scale will be administered through a survey and assess whether people perceive their social norms (public stigma) differently.
The 12 items in the scale will be averaged and will range from 0-3, with higher values indicating greater perceived public stigma.
|
The intervention takes place on a single day, and so the assessments will occur at baseline and immediately following the intervention (post-test) on the same day, and then 30-day follow-up.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Hans Oh, PhD, University of Southern California
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.
Publicaciones Generales
- Link, B. G., Cullen, F. T., Frank, J., & Wozniak, J. F. (1987). The social rejection of former mental patients: Understanding why labels matter. American journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1461-1500.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Estimado)
1 de septiembre de 2026
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
30 de octubre de 2026
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
1 de mayo de 2027
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
25 de agosto de 2025
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
27 de junio de 2026
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
6 de julio de 2026
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
3 de septiembre de 2026
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
31 de agosto de 2026
Última verificación
1 de agosto de 2026
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- UP-24-00999
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
NO
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .