Estimating the prevalence of infertility in Canada

Tracey Bushnik, Jocelynn L Cook, A Albert Yuzpe, Suzanne Tough, John Collins, Tracey Bushnik, Jocelynn L Cook, A Albert Yuzpe, Suzanne Tough, John Collins

Abstract

Background: Over the past 10 years, there has been a significant increase in the use of assisted reproductive technologies in Canada, however, little is known about the overall prevalence of infertility in the population. The purpose of the present study was to estimate the prevalence of current infertility in Canada according to three definitions of the risk of conception.

Methods: Data from the infertility component of the 2009-2010 Canadian Community Health Survey were analyzed for married and common-law couples with a female partner aged 18-44. The three definitions of the risk of conception were derived sequentially starting with birth control use in the previous 12 months, adding reported sexual intercourse in the previous 12 months, then pregnancy intent. Prevalence and odds ratios of current infertility were estimated by selected characteristics.

Results: Estimates of the prevalence of current infertility ranged from 11.5% (95% CI 10.2, 12.9) to 15.7% (95% CI 14.2, 17.4). Each estimate represented an increase in current infertility prevalence in Canada when compared with previous national estimates. Couples with lower parity (0 or 1 child) had significantly higher odds of experiencing current infertility when the female partner was aged 35-44 years versus 18-34 years. Lower odds of experiencing current infertility were observed for multiparous couples regardless of age group of the female partner, when compared with nulliparous couples.

Conclusions: The present study suggests that the prevalence of current infertility has increased since the last time it was measured in Canada, and is associated with the age of the female partner and parity.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of current infertility by age group of female partner, according to three definitions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence of current infertility by parity and age group of female partner, according to three definitions.

References

    1. Abdi H. The Bonferonni and Šidák Corrections for Multiple Comparisons. In: Salkind N, editor. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007.
    1. Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;173:220–233.
    1. Anderson K, Nisenblat V, Norman R. Lifestyle factors in people seeking infertility treatment - A review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50:8–20.
    1. Balakrishnan TR, Fernando R. The Prevalence of Infertility in Canada: Research Studies of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada; 1993. Infertility among Canadians: an analysis of data from the Canadian Fertility Survey (1984) and General Social Survey (1990) pp. 107–162.
    1. Bhattacharya S, Porter M, Amalraj E, Templeton A, Hamilton M, Lee A, Kurinczuk J. The epidemiology of infertility in the North East of Scotland. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:3096–3107.
    1. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1506–1512.
    1. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. Reply: International estimates on infertility prevalence and treatment seeking: potential need and demand for medical care. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2380–2383.
    1. Bouzayen R, Eggertson L. In vitro fertilization: a private matter becomes public. Can Med Assoc J. 2009;181:243.
    1. Brassard M, AinMelk Y, Baillargeon J-P. Basic Infertility Including Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Med Clin North Am. 2008;92:1163–1192.
    1. Carson J. Family spending power. Perspect Labour Income. 2002;10:5–13.
    1. Chambers GM, Sullivan E, Ishihara O, Chapman M, Adamson G. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2281–2294.
    1. Chandra A, Stephen EH. Impaired Fecundity in the United States: 1982–1995. Fam Plan Perspect. 1998;30:34–42.
    1. Clark W. Delayed transitions of young adults. Canadian Social Trends 2007. 2007;Winter:13–21.
    1. Deonandan R. The public health implications of assisted reproductive technologies. Chronic Dis Can. 2010;30:119–124.
    1. Dulberg CS, Stephens T. The Prevalence of Infertility in Canada: Research Studies of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada; 1993. The prevalence of infertility in Canada, 1991–1992: analysis of three national surveys; pp. 61–106.
    1. Evers J. Female subfertility. Lancet. 2002;360:151–159.
    1. Goldman MB, Missmer SA, Barbieri RL. Infertility. In: Goldman MB, Missmer SA, editors. Women and Health. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2000. pp. 196–214.
    1. Gougeon A. The biological aspects of risks of infertility due to age: the female side. Rev Epidémiol Santé Publique. 2005;53:2S37–2S45.
    1. Grodstein F, Goldman MB, Cramer DW. Body Mass Index and Ovulatory Infertility. Epidemiology. 1994;5:247–250.
    1. Gunby J, Daya S on behalf of the IVF Directors Group of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2001 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:590–599.
    1. Gunby J, Bissonnette F, Librach C, Cowan L on behalf of the IVF Directors Group of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1721–1730.
    1. Gunby J, Bissonnette F, Librach C, Cowan L on behalf of the IVF Directors Group of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2189–2201.
    1. Gunby J, Bissonnette F, Librach C, Cowan L on behalf of the IVF Directors Group of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2007 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:542–547.
    1. Gurunath S, Pandian Z, Anderson RA, Bhattacharya S. Defining infertility - a systematic review of prevalence studies. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:575–588.
    1. Guzick DS, Swan S. The decline of infertility: apparent or real? Fertil Steril. 2006;86:524–526.
    1. Herbert DL, Lucke JC, Dobson AJ. Infertility, medical advice and treatment with fertility hormones and/or in vitro fertilisation: a population perspective from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009;33:358–364.
    1. Kelly-Weeder S, Cox CL. The impact of lifestyle risk factors on female infertility. Women Health. 2006;44:1–23.
    1. Larsen U. Research on infertility: which definition should we use? Fertil Steril. 2005;83:846–852.
    1. Macaluso M, Wright-Schnapp TJ, Chandra A, Johnson R, Satterwhite CL, Pulver A, Berman SM, Wang RY, Farr SL, Pollack LA. A public health focus on infertility prevention, detection, and management. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:16.e1–16.e10.
    1. Marchbanks PA, Peterson HB, Rubin GL, Wingo PA the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group. Research on Infertility: Definition makes a difference. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;130:259–267.
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada. Report on Sexually Transmitted Infections in Canada: 2008. 2010. Available at . (29 August 2011, date last accessed)
    1. Rowe PJ, Comhaire FH, Hargreave TB, Mellows HJ. WHO Manual for the Standard Investigation and Diagnosis of the Infertile Couple. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
    1. Sciarra J. Infertility: an international health problem. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1994;46:155–163.
    1. Shields M, Tremblay MS, Laviolette M, Craig CL, Janssen I, Connor Gorber S. Fitness of Canadian adults: results from the 2007–2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Reports. 2010;21:21–35.
    1. Statistics Canada. 1985. pp. 84–204. Births and Deaths 1984 Catalogue.
    1. Statistics Canada. Smoking Status, by Age Group and Sex. 1998a. CANSIM table #104–0027 Available at . (29 August 2011, date last accessed)
    1. Statistics Canada. Frequency of Drinking in the Past 12 Months, by Age Group and Sex. 1998b. CANSIM table #104–0031 Available at . (29 August 2011, date last accessed)
    1. Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey: Rapid Response on Infertility Complement to the User Guide—December 2010. 2010a. Available upon request through e-mail to hd-ds@statcan.gc.ca.
    1. Statistics Canada. Health Indicator Profile, Annual Estimates, by Age Group and Sex. 2010b. CANSIM table #105-0501 Available at . (29 August 2011, date last accessed)
    1. Statistics Canada. Births 2008. 2011a. Catalogue 84F0210X.
    1. Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) Annual Component User guide—2010 and 2009–2010 Microdata Files—June 2011. 2011b. Available at . (15 September 2011, date last accessed)
    1. Stephen EH, Chandra A. Estimating infertility: not the last word. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:534.
    1. Swanton A, Child T. Reproduction and ovarian ageing. J Br Menopause Soc. 2005;11:126–131.
    1. Thonneau P, Spira A. Prevalence of infertility: international data and problems of measurement. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1990;38:43–52.
    1. van Noord-Zaadstra BM, Looman CW, Alsbach H, Habbema JD, te Velde E, Karbatt J. Delaying childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy. Br Med J. 1991;302:1361–1365.
    1. Webb S, Holman D. A survey of infertility, surgical sterility and associated reproductive disability in Perth, Western Australia. Aust J Public Health. 1992;16:376–381.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir