Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis of Results from Phase 2/3 Studies

William J Sandborn, Brian G Feagan, Silvio Danese, Christopher D O'Brien, Elyssa Ott, Colleen Marano, Thomas Baker, Yiying Zhou, Sheri Volger, Ilia Tikhonov, Christopher Gasink, Bruce E Sands, Subrata Ghosh, William J Sandborn, Brian G Feagan, Silvio Danese, Christopher D O'Brien, Elyssa Ott, Colleen Marano, Thomas Baker, Yiying Zhou, Sheri Volger, Ilia Tikhonov, Christopher Gasink, Bruce E Sands, Subrata Ghosh

Abstract

Background: Ustekinumab is currently approved globally in Crohn's disease (CD) and psoriatic diseases. Recent phase 3 data demonstrate safety/efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC). Crohn's disease and UC phase 3 programs had similar study designs, facilitating integrated safety analyses.

Methods: Data from 6 ustekinumab phase 2/3 CD and UC studies were pooled, and safety was evaluated through 1 year. Patients received 1 placebo or ustekinumab (generally 130 mg or ~6 mg/kg) intravenous induction, then subcutaneous (90 mg) maintenance every 8/12 weeks. Analyses incorporated all patients who received ≥1 ustekinumab dose. Safety outcomes are presented as percentages of patients (induction) and as number of patients with events per 100 patient-years of follow-up (through 1 year). For key safety events, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are provided, as appropriate. Hazard ratios with 95% CIs from time-to-event analyses for serious adverse events and serious infections were also performed.

Results: Through 1 year, 2574 patients received ustekinumab (1733 patient-years of follow-up). The number of patients with adverse events per 100 patient-years (placebo 165.99 [95% CI, 155.81-176.67] vs ustekinumab 118.32 [95% CI, 113.25-123.55]), serious AEs (27.50 [95% CI, 23.45-32.04] vs 21.23 [95% CI, 19.12-23.51]), infections (80.31 [95% CI, 73.28-87.84] vs 64.32 [95% CI, 60.60-68.21]), serious infections (5.53 [95% CI, 3.81-7.77] vs 5.02 [95% CI, 4.02-6.19]), and malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (0.17 [95% CI, 0.00-0.93] vs 0.40 [95% CI, 0.16-0.83]) were similar between placebo and ustekinumab.

Conclusions: The safety profile of ustekinumab across the pooled inflammatory bowel disease population through 1 year was favorable and generally comparable to placebo. These data are consistent with the established safety profile of ustekinumab across indications.

Clinicaltrials.gov numbers: NCT00265122; NCT00771667; NCT01369329; NCT01369342; NCT01369355; NCT02407236.

Keywords: inflammatory bowel disease; safety; ustekinumab.

© 2020 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
All malignances excluding NMSC (a), malignancies including NMSC (b), and malignancies compared with National Institutes of Health Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (c). aOne malignancy was not included as patient’s race was unknown. Abbreviation: NMSC, non-melanoma skin cancer.

References

    1. Kimball AB, Gordon KB, Fakharzadeh S, et al. . Long-term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the PHOENIX 1 trial through up to 3 years. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:861–872.
    1. Kimball AB, Papp KA, Wasfi Y, et al. ; PHOENIX 1 Investigators . Long-term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated for up to 5 years in the PHOENIX 1 study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:1535–1545.
    1. Leonardi CL, Kimball AB, Papp KA, et al. ; PHOENIX 1 study investigators . Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 76-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 1). Lancet. 2008;371: 1665–1674.
    1. Sandborn WJ, Gasink C, Gao LL, et al. ; CERTIFI Study Group . Ustekinumab induction and maintenance therapy in refractory Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1519–1528.
    1. Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Gasink C, et al. ; UNITI–IM-UNITI Study Group . Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1946–1960.
    1. Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Gasink C, et al. . Long-term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for Crohn’s disease through the second year of therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48:65–77.
    1. Ghosh S, Gensler LS, Yang Z, et al. . Ustekinumab safety in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and Crohn’s disease: an integrated analysis of phase II/III clinical development programs. Drug Saf. 2019;42:751–768.
    1. Papp KA, Griffiths CE, Gordon K, et al. ; PHOENIX 1 Investigators; PHOENIX 2 Investigators; ACCEPT Investigators . Long-term safety of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: final results from 5 years of follow-up. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168:844–854.
    1. Ritchlin C, Rahman P, Kavanaugh A, et al. ; PSUMMIT 2 Study Group . Efficacy and safety of the anti-IL-12/23 p40 monoclonal antibody, ustekinumab, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis despite conventional non-biological and biological anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: 6-month and 1-year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised PSUMMIT 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:990–999.
    1. McInnes IB, Kavanaugh A, Gottlieb AB, et al. ; PSUMMIT 1 Study Group . Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 1 year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled PSUMMIT 1 trial. Lancet. 2013;382:780–789.
    1. Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, et al. ; UNIFI Study Group . Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1201–1214.
    1. Papp K, Gottlieb AB, Naldi L, et al. . Safety surveillance for ustekinumab and other psoriasis treatments from the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR). J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14:706–714.
    1. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Fedorak RN, et al. ; Ustekinumab Crohn’s Disease Study Group . A randomized trial of Ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1130–1141.
    1. STELARA [package insert]. Horsham, PA: Janssen Biotech, Inc.; 2018.
    1. Al-Zafiri R, Gologan A, Galiatsatos P, Szilagyi A. Cytomegalovirus complicating inflammatory bowel disease: a 10-year experience in a community-based, university-affiliated hospital. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 2012;8:230–239.
    1. Domènech E, Vega R, Ojanguren I, et al. . Cytomegalovirus infection in ulcerative colitis: a prospective, comparative study on prevalence and diagnostic strategy. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1373–1379.
    1. Nembrini C, Abel B, Kopf M, Marsland BJ. Strong TCR signaling, TLR ligands, and cytokine redundancies ensure robust development of type 1 effector T cells. J Immunol. 2006;176:7180–7188.
    1. Fiorentino D, Ho V, Lebwohl MG, et al. . Risk of malignancy with systemic psoriasis treatment in the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment Registry. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77:845–854.e5.
    1. Scharl S, Barthel C, Rossel J-B, et al. . Malignancies in inflammatory bowel disease: frequency, incidence and risk factors-results from the Swiss IBD Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:116–126.
    1. Rubin AI, Chen EH, Ratner D. Basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2262–2269.
    1. Nguyen GC, Bernstein CN, Bitton A, et al. . Consensus statements on the risk, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease: Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:835–848.e6.
    1. Zezos P, Kouklakis G, Saibil F. Inflammatory bowel disease and thromboembolism. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:13863–13878.
    1. Papa A, Gerardi V, Marzo M, et al. . Venous thromboembolism in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: focus on prevention and treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:3173–3179.
    1. Grainge MJ, West J, Card TR. Venous thromboembolism during active disease and remission in inflammatory bowel disease: a cohort study. Lancet. 2010;375:657–663.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir