Targeted DNA methylation analysis by next-generation sequencing

Dustin R Masser, David R Stanford, Willard M Freeman, Dustin R Masser, David R Stanford, Willard M Freeman

Abstract

The role of epigenetic processes in the control of gene expression has been known for a number of years. DNA methylation at cytosine residues is of particular interest for epigenetic studies as it has been demonstrated to be both a long lasting and a dynamic regulator of gene expression. Efforts to examine epigenetic changes in health and disease have been hindered by the lack of high-throughput, quantitatively accurate methods. With the advent and popularization of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, these tools are now being applied to epigenomics in addition to existing genomic and transcriptomic methodologies. For epigenetic investigations of cytosine methylation where regions of interest, such as specific gene promoters or CpG islands, have been identified and there is a need to examine significant numbers of samples with high quantitative accuracy, we have developed a method called Bisulfite Amplicon Sequencing (BSAS). This method combines bisulfite conversion with targeted amplification of regions of interest, transposome-mediated library construction and benchtop NGS. BSAS offers a rapid and efficient method for analysis of up to 10 kb of targeted regions in up to 96 samples at a time that can be performed by most research groups with basic molecular biology skills. The results provide absolute quantitation of cytosine methylation with base specificity. BSAS can be applied to any genomic region from any DNA source. This method is useful for hypothesis testing studies of target regions of interest as well as confirmation of regions identified in genome-wide methylation analyses such as whole genome bisulfite sequencing, reduced representation bisulfite sequencing, and methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4354667/bin/jove-96-52488-thumb.jpg

References

    1. Hotchkiss RD. The quantitative separation of purines, pyrimidines, and nucleosides by paper chromatography. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1948;175(1):315–332.
    1. Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes & Development. 2002;16(1):6–21.
    1. Smith ZD, Meissner A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nature reviews. Genetics. 2013;14(3):204–220.
    1. Heard E, Martienssen RA. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: myths and mechanisms. Cell. 2014;157(1):95–109.
    1. Baylin SB. DNA methylation and gene silencing in cancer. Nature Clinical Practice. Oncology. 2005;2(1):S4–S11.
    1. Baylin SB. The cancer epigenome: its origins, contributions to tumorigenesis, and translational implications. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society. 2012;9(2):64–65.
    1. Beck S, Rakyan VK. The methylome: approaches for global DNA methylation profiling. Trends in Genetics : TIG. 2008;24(5):231–237.
    1. Laird PW. Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nature reviews. Genetics. 2010;11(3):191–203.
    1. Mikeska T, et al. Optimization of quantitative MGMT promoter methylation analysis using pyrosequencing and combined bisulfite restriction analysis. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics : JMD. 2007;9(3):368–381.
    1. Kreutz M, Hochstein N, Kaiser J, Narz F, Peist R, et al. Pyrosequencing: powerful and quantitative sequencing technology. Current Protocols In. Molecular Biology / edited by Frederick M. Ausubel ... [et al.] 2013;104(Unit 7 15)
    1. Dikow N, et al. Quantification of the methylation status of the PWS/AS imprinted region: comparison of two approaches based on bisulfite sequencing and methylation-sensitive MLPA. Molecular And Cellular Probes. 2007;21(3):208–215.
    1. Parrish RR, Day JJ, Lubin FD, et al. Direct bisulfite sequencing for examination of DNA methylation with gene and nucleotide resolution from brain tissues. Current Protocols In Neuroscience / editorial board, Jacqueline N. Crawley ... [et al.] 2012;7(Unit 7 24)
    1. Shapiro R, Servis RE, Welcher M. Reactions of uracil and cytosine derivatives with sodium bisulfite. A specific deamination method. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1970;92:422–424.
    1. Hayatsu H, Wataya Y, Kazushige K. The addition of sodium bisulfite to uracil and to cytosine. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1970;92(3):724–726.
    1. Wang RY, Gehrke CW, Ehrlich M. Comparison of bisulfite modification of 5-methyldeoxycytidine and deoxycytidine residues. Nucleic Acids Research. 1980;8(20):4777–4790.
    1. Masser DR, Berg AS, Focused Freeman WM. high accuracy 5-methylcytosine quantitation with base resolution by benchtop next-generation sequencing. Epigenetics & Chromatin. 2013;6(1):33.
    1. Caruccio N. Preparation of next-generation sequencing libraries using Nextera technology: simultaneous DNA fragmentation and adaptor tagging by in vitro transposition. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2011;733:241–255.
    1. Quail MA, et al. A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:341.
    1. Adey A, Shendure JUltra-low-input. tagmentation-based whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Genome Research. 2012;22(6):1139–1143.
    1. Smallwood SA, et al. Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic heterogeneity. Nature Methods. 2014;11(8):817–820.
    1. Wang J, et al. Universal endogenous gene controls for bisulphite conversion in analysis of plant DNA methylation. Plant Methods. 2011;7:39.
    1. Lister R, et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature. 2009;462(7271):315–322.
    1. Ivanov M, et al. In-solution hybrid capture of bisulfite-converted DNA for targeted bisulfite sequencing of 174 ADME genes. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41(6):e72.
    1. Booth MJ, et al. Oxidative bisulfite sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nature Protocols. 2013;8(10):1841–1851.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir