A multicentre randomised phase II study of carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine at standard rate or fixed dose rate infusion in patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer

R A Soo, L Z Wang, L S Tham, W P Yong, M Boyer, H L Lim, H S Lee, M Millward, S Liang, P Beale, S C Lee, B C Goh, R A Soo, L Z Wang, L S Tham, W P Yong, M Boyer, H L Lim, H S Lee, M Millward, S Liang, P Beale, S C Lee, B C Goh

Abstract

Background: Intracellular gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) levels can be optimised by administering gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate infusion.

Patients and methods: Patients with chemonaive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomised to receive gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) over 75 min (arm A) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) over 30 min (arm B) on days 1 and 8 every three week cycle. Carboplatin at AUC of 5 was administered in both treatment arms on day 1 of each cycle. End points were activity, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of plasma and intracellular gemcitabine.

Results: 76 patients were randomised. Response rate was 34% in arm A and 42% in arm B. Toxicity and quality of life scores were similar for both treatment arms. Mean plasma Cmax(gemcitabine) and mean dFdCTP AUC in arm A was 20.8 microM +/- 17.2 microM and 35,079 +/- 18,216 microM*min respectively and in arm B, 41.2 +/- 13.9 microM and 32 249 +/- 11 267 microM*min respectively. dFdCTP saturation was reached in Arm B but not in Arm A.

Conclusion: The saturability of dFdCTP accumulation in Arm A suggests optimal delivery of gemcitabine is achieved using fixed rate infusion compared to 30-min infusion. Fixed dose rate gemcitabine is active and feasible, supporting the concept of fixed dosing rate of gemcitabine in advanced NSCLC. However, this entails a longer infusion time with associated higher costs involved.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir