Rehabilitation coordinator intervention versus control in psychiatric specialist care for return to work and reduced sick leave: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Åsa Andersén, Erik Berglund, Ingrid Anderzén, Åsa Andersén, Erik Berglund, Ingrid Anderzén

Abstract

Background: Mental disorders are the most common reason for sick leave in Sweden. Knowledge about effective methods to help these individuals to return to work (RTW)/entry into work or studies is limited. Rehabilitation coordinators (RC's) have been introduced within healthcare with the purpose to promote cooperation, streamline the sick leave and rehabilitation process, and facilitate RTW for sick-listed patients. The function of RC's has shown positive results by reducing sick leave within primary healthcare. However, the function has not been evaluated in terms of specialist psychiatry. This paper describes the design of a study to evaluate effects of a RC intervention on sick leave and RTW/entry in work or studies in patients with moderate to severe affective and/or moderate to severe anxiety disorders within specialist psychiatric care.

Methods: A randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing an intervention group receiving support from a RC with a control group receiving treatment as usual (TAU). The target group is patients on sick leave, treated for affective and/or anxiety disorder, aged 25-64, with or without employment.

Discussion: This study gives the possibility to evaluate a RC intervention for individuals with mental disorders. If the study has promising vocational outcomes, it may be of importance for the participants in many ways, e.g. increase participation in society, provide economic benefits and improve health and wellbeing. This would be valuable for the individual as well as for the society.

Trial registration: The study is registered at the Clinicaltrials.gov Register Platform (ID NCT03729050) in 2 November 2018.

Keywords: Coordination; Intervention; Rehabilitation; Return to work; Specialist psychiatric care.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for recruitment process and data collection

References

    1. World Health Organization. Mental health: Fact sheet. . Accessed 17 Feb 2020.
    1. Försäkringskassan. [The Swedish Social Insurance Agency]. Korta analyser 2017:1. Psykiatriska diagnoser. Lång väg tillbaka till arbete vid sjukskrivning. [Short analyzes 2017:7. Psychiatric diagnoses. Long way back to work in case of sick leave] 2017.
    1. Vingård Eva, Alexanderson Kristina, Norlund Anders. Chapter 9. Consequences of being on sick leave. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2004;32(63_suppl):207–215. doi: 10.1080/14034950410021899.
    1. Alexanderson K, Aronsson G, Floderus B, Göransson S. The influence of long-term sick leave on daily life. Arbete och Hälsa. Stockholm: National Institute for Working Life; 2003.
    1. Wallman T, Wedel H, Palmer E, Rosengren A, Johansson S, Eriksson H, Svardsudd K. Sick-leave track record and other potential predictors of a disability pension. A population based study of 8,218 men and women followed for 16 years. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:104.
    1. Hewlett Emily, Moran Valerie. Making Mental Health Count. 2014.
    1. Socialstyrelsen [The National Board of Health and Welfare]. Nationella riktlinjer. Utvärdering av vård vid depression och ångestsyndrom. Huvudrapport med förbättringsområden. [National guidelines. Evaluation of care for depression and anxiety syndrome. Main report with areas of improvement. 2019.
    1. Eurofound. Active inclusion of young people with disabilities or health problems. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2012.
    1. McKee-Ryan Frances, Song Zhaoli, Wanberg Connie R., Kinicki Angelo J. Psychological and Physical Well-Being During Unemployment: A Meta-Analytic Study. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2005;90(1):53–76. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.53.
    1. Vingård E. Psykisk ohälsa, arbetsliv och sjukfrånvaro [Mental illness, working life and sick leave]. 2015.
    1. Försäkringskassan [The Swedish Social Insurance Agency]. Socialförsäkringen i siffror 2015 [The Social Insurance in figures 2015]. Stockholm; 2015.
    1. Ekberg K. Faser i arbetslivsinriktad rehabilitering [Phases in vocational rehabilitation]. Socialmedicinsk tidskrift. 2009;(3):210–9.
    1. Regeringen [The Swedish Government]. Socialförsäkringsbalk 2010:110. [Social Insurance Act 2010:10]. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksdag; 2010.
    1. Ståhl Christian, Svensson Tommy, Ekberg Kerstin. From Cooperation to Conflict? Swedish Rehabilitation Professionals’ Experiences of Interorganizational Cooperation. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2011;21(3):441–448. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9281-1.
    1. Ekberg K, Eklund M, Hensing G. Återgång i arbete: processer, bedömningar, åtgärder [Return to work: processes, assessments, actions]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2015.
    1. Ekberg K. Den relativa arbetsförmågan: teoretiska och praktiska perspektiv. [The relative work ability: theoretical and practical perspectives]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2014.
    1. Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–68.
    1. Franche Renée-Louise, Cullen Kimberley, Clarke Judy, Irvin Emma, Sinclair Sandra, Frank John. Workplace-Based Return-to-Work Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Quantitative Literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2005;15(4):607–631. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8038-8.
    1. Schandelmaier Stefan, Ebrahim Shanil, Burkhardt Susan C. A., de Boer Wout E. L., Zumbrunn Thomas, Guyatt Gordon H., Busse Jason W., Kunz Regina. Return to Work Coordination Programmes for Work Disability: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11):e49760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049760.
    1. Vogel N, Schandelmaier S, Zumbrunn T, Ebrahim S, de Boer WE, Busse JW, Kunz R. Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3:Cd011618.
    1. Hansen Falkdal A, Hörnqwist Bylund S, Edlund C, Janlert U, Bernspång B. ReKoord-projektet. Nationell utvärdering av koordinatorsfunktionen inom sjukskrivnings- och rehabiliteringsområdet. [The ReKoord project. National evaluation of the coordinator function in the field of sick leave andrehabilitation]. []. Västerbotten County Council. Accessed 17 Feb 2020.
    1. Hansen Falkdahl A, Hörnqwist Bylund S. Hälso- och sjukvårdens funktion för koordinering i sjukskrivnings- och rehabiliteringsprocessen. En litteraturstudie. [The function of the health care coordination in the sick leave and rehabilitation process. A literature study]. Stockholm. 2015.
    1. Regeringen [The Swedish Government]. En kvalitetssäker sjukskrivnings- och rehabiliteringsprocess. Överenskommelse mellan staten och Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting 2017-2018. [A quality assured sick leave and rehabilitation process. Agreement between the state and The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. 2017-2018. 2016.
    1. Socialstyrelsen [The National Board of Health and Welfare]. The ICF/ICF-CY utbildningsmaterial. Del 1 – Introduktion, modell, struktur och innehåll. Version2,0. [The ICF / ICF-CY training materials. Part 1 - Introduction, model, structure and content. Version2,0]. []. Accessed 3 July 2017.
    1. HealthNavigator. Lägre sjukskrivning med rehabkoordinator. Delrapport 2. Utvärdering av rehabkoordinator för patienter med långvarig smärta och/eller lätt medelsvår psykisk ohälsa i Stockholms läns landsting. [Lower sick leave with a rehabilitation coordinator. Interim report 2. Evaluation of rehabilitation coordinator for patients with long-term pain and/or mild to moderate mental disorder in Stockholm County Council]. Region Stockholm; 2017.
    1. Björk L, Nilsson M J, Kokko A, Nettervik Z, Paulsson S. Tillsammans för att främja hälsa och förebygga sjukfrånvaro. Slutrapport från Mobiliseringsinitiativet Försäkringskassan och Västra Götalandsregionen [Together to promote health and prevent sickness absence. Final report from the Mobilization initiative by the Swedish Social Insurance and the Region of Västra Götaland]. 2017.
    1. Försäkringskassan [The Swedish Social Insurance Agency]. Sjukersättning [Sickness compensation]. []. Accessed 17 Feb 2020.
    1. Sveriges kommuner och Landsting. [The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions]. Method för koordinering av sjukskrivning och rehabilitering för hälso- och sjukvården. [Method book for coordination of sick leave and rehabilitation for healthcare]. Stockholm; 2016.
    1. Liv och hälsa 2008 - en undersökning om hälsa, levnadsvanor och livsvillkor. [Life and health 2008 - a survey on health, lifestyles and living conditions]. . Accessed 5 Oct 2015.
    1. EuroQol Group. EuroQol -a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.
    1. Ramos-Goñi Juan M., Oppe Mark, Slaap Bernhard, Busschbach Jan J.V., Stolk Elly. Quality Control Process for EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies. Value in Health. 2017;20(3):466–473. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.012.
    1. Linton Steven J., Boersma Katja. Early Identification of Patients at Risk of Developing a Persistent Back Problem: The Predictive Validity of The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2003;19(2):80–86. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200303000-00002.
    1. Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1983;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
    1. Braconier A. Välmåendeformuläret – ett mått på subjektivt välmående. Psykometrisk utvärdering av en ny självskattningsskala [The well-being questionnaire - a measure of subjective well-being. Psychometric evaluation of a new self-assessment scale]. Stockholms universitet; 2015.
    1. Socialstyrelsen [The National Board of Health and Welfare]. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS). 2017.
    1. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Self-efficacy measurement and generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Measures in health psychology: a user's portfolio. edn. Edited by Johnston MW, John SCW. Windsor: NFER-NELSON; 1995. p. 33–39.
    1. Boström G, Nyqvist K. Objective and background of the questions in the national public health survey. Östersund: The Swedish National Institute of Public Health; 2010.
    1. Ilmarinen J. The Work Ability Index (WAI) Occupational Medicine. 2006;57(2):160–160. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqm008.
    1. Andersen MF, Nielsen KM, Brinkmann S. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38(2):93–104. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3257.
    1. Fossey Ellie M., Harvey Carol A. Finding and sustaining employment: A qualitative meta-synthesis of mental health consumer views. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2010;77(5):303–314. doi: 10.1177/000841741007700501.
    1. Regeringen. [The Swedish Government]. Uppdrag till Arbetsförmedlingen inför reformeringen. [Mission to the Employment Service for the reformation]. Stockholm; 2019.
    1. Westerholm P, Lytsy, P, Helgesson, M, Lundberg I, Fredriksson K, Gustafsson M, Anderzén I, Rehfisch P, Zaar K. Aktivitetsersättning – en väg till arbete. En systematisk litteraturöversikt [Evidence-based methods for enhancing the labourforce entrance of people with mental disabilities. A systematic literature review]. 2012. .
    1. Strong S. Meaningful work in supportive environments: experiences with the recovery process. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52(1):31–38. doi: 10.5014/ajot.52.1.31.
    1. Brown A, Kitchell M, O'Neill T, Lockliear J, Vosler A, Kubek D, Dale L. Identifying meaning and perceived level of satisfaction within the context of work. Work. 2001;16(3):219–226.
    1. Regeringen [The Government of Sweden]. Lagrådsremiss. Ny lag om koordineringsinsatser för vissa sjukskrivna patienter. [Council on Legislation. New law on coordination efforts for certain sick patients] []. Accessed 17 Feb 2020.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir