Symptoms suggestive of dumping syndrome after provocation in patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

George Tzovaras, Dimitris Papamargaritis, Eleni Sioka, Eleni Zachari, Ioannis Baloyiannis, Dimitris Zacharoulis, George Koukoulis, George Tzovaras, Dimitris Papamargaritis, Eleni Sioka, Eleni Zachari, Ioannis Baloyiannis, Dimitris Zacharoulis, George Koukoulis

Abstract

Background: Dumping syndrome is a well-known complication after upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. There are scarce data in the literature about the incidence of dumping after bariatric operations but, certainly no relation between this syndrome and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been attempted.

Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical study in order to evaluate the potential presence, incidence and severity of Dumping syndrome after LSG. Thirty one non-diabetic morbidly obese patients (eight male, 23 female) eligible for LSG were evaluated. Median age was 38 (22-58 years) and mean body mass index (BMI) was 45.55 (± 5.37). The diagnosis of dumping syndrome was based on clinical provocation of signs and symptoms using an oral glucose challenge before and 6 weeks after the operation. The Sigstad's dumping score was estimated in order to separate dumpers from non-dumpers, and the Arts questionnaire was completed to distinguish between early and late dumping. Moreover, blood glucose levels during the oral glucose challenge were measured.

Results: No patient had symptoms of dumping after provocation preoperatively, whereas after LSG 9 patients (29%) experienced definite dumping and other 5 patients (16%) symptoms suggestive of dumping syndrome. Arts' questionnaire demonstrated that dumping occurrence after LSG was associated with early symptoms. Late hypoglycaemia occurred in one patient.

Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients after LSG experienced dumping syndrome upon provocation. It seems that LSG should no longer be considered as a pure restrictive procedure, and it might be an option for heavy sweeters by changing their food tolerance patterns.

References

    1. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Apr;7(4):432-7
    1. Obes Surg. 1996 Dec;6(6):474-478
    1. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2002 Sep;9(3):190-6
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Jun;63(6):1568-72
    1. Obes Surg. 2011 Jul;21(7):902-9
    1. Ann Surg. 1987 Jun;205(6):613-24
    1. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2007 Nov;23(6):625-30
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Dec 15;115(12):956-61
    1. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):234-41
    1. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Oct;6(10):583-90
    1. Obes Surg. 2009 Nov;19(11):1515-21
    1. Clin Auton Res. 2000 Oct;10(5):301-8
    1. Ann Surg. 2008 Mar;247(3):401-7
    1. Obes Surg. 2011 Jan;21(1):95-101
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1997;223:21-7
    1. Gastroenterology. 1983 Apr;84(4):840-2
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Jul;93(7):2479-85
    1. Obes Surg. 2008 Sep;18(9):1083-8
    1. Obes Surg. 2011 Apr;21(4):473-8
    1. Acta Med Scand. 1970 Dec;188(6):479-86
    1. Obes Surg. 2008 Oct;18(10):1251-6
    1. Obes Surg. 2007 Jan;17(1):57-62
    1. Am J Med Sci. 2006 Apr;331(4):214-8
    1. Obes Surg. 2009 Mar;19(3):293-8
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Mar;95(3):1069-75
    1. Stat Bull Metrop Life Found. 1983 Jan-Jun;64(1):3-9

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir