Baby steps: investigating the development of perceptual-motor couplings in infancy

Carina C J M de Klerk, Mark H Johnson, Cecilia M Heyes, Victoria Southgate, Carina C J M de Klerk, Mark H Johnson, Cecilia M Heyes, Victoria Southgate

Abstract

There are cells in our motor cortex that fire both when we perform and when we observe similar actions. It has been suggested that these perceptual-motor couplings in the brain develop through associative learning during correlated sensorimotor experience. Although studies with adult participants have provided support for this hypothesis, there is no direct evidence that associative learning also underlies the initial formation of perceptual-motor couplings in the developing brain. With the present study we addressed this question by manipulating infants' opportunities to associate the visual and motor representation of a novel action, and by investigating how this influenced their sensorimotor cortex activation when they observed this action performed by others. Pre-walking 7-9-month-old infants performed stepping movements on an infant treadmill while they either observed their own real-time leg movements (Contingent group) or the previously recorded leg movements of another infant (Non-contingent control group). Infants in a second control group did not perform any steps and only received visual experience with the stepping actions. Before and after the training period we measured infants' sensorimotor alpha suppression, as an index of sensorimotor cortex activation, while they watched videos of other infants' stepping actions. While we did not find greater sensorimotor alpha suppression following training in the Contingent group as a whole, we nevertheless found that the strength of the visuomotor contingency experienced during training predicted the amount of sensorimotor alpha suppression at post-test in this group. We did not find any effects of motor experience alone. These results suggest that the development of perceptual-motor couplings in the infant brain is likely to be supported by associative learning during correlated visuomotor experience.

© 2014 The Authors Developmental Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screensaver-like baseline videos and stepping actions presented during the pre- and post-test EEG sessions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experimental setup during the training phase of the experiment. Infants were placed in a baby bouncer while they were supported over the infant treadmill by the experimenter. Infants either saw their own leg movements online or another infant's previously recorded leg movements on a 51-inch plasma screen. Infants wore a skirt to prevent them from receiving correlated visuomotor experience by looking down at their own legs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Mean sensorimotor alpha suppression over the central leg areas at pre- and post-test. We found a significant increase in sensorimotor alpha suppression between pre- and post-test over the central leg areas *p

Figure 4

Scatter plot of the relationship…

Figure 4

Scatter plot of the relationship between experienced visuomotor contingency during the training and…

Figure 4
Scatter plot of the relationship between experienced visuomotor contingency during the training and sensorimotor alpha suppression at post-test in the Contingent condition. Stronger visuomotor contingency is associated with more sensorimotor alpha suppression (indicating more sensorimotor cortex activation) at post-test. One data point was replaced with a value .01 greater than the highest non-outlier scores to normalize the distribution. The replaced data point is represented by the transparent dot and the dotted line represents the regression line after the outlier correction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scatter plot of the relationship between experienced visuomotor contingency during the training and sensorimotor alpha suppression at post-test in the Contingent condition. Stronger visuomotor contingency is associated with more sensorimotor alpha suppression (indicating more sensorimotor cortex activation) at post-test. One data point was replaced with a value .01 greater than the highest non-outlier scores to normalize the distribution. The replaced data point is represented by the transparent dot and the dotted line represents the regression line after the outlier correction.

References

    1. Arnstein D, Cui F, Keysers C, Maurits NM. Gazzola V. μ-suppression during action observation and execution correlates with BOLD in dorsal premotor, inferior parietal, and SI cortices. Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31:14243–14249.
    1. Bertenthal BI. Longo MR. Is there evidence of a mirror neuron system from birth? Developmental Science. 2007;10:513–523.
    1. Catmur C, Gillmeister H, Bird G, Liepelt R, Brass M. Heyes CM. Through the looking glass: counter-mirror activation following incompatible sensori-motor learning. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2008;28:1208–1215.
    1. Catmur C, Walsh V. Heyes CM. Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Current Biology. 2007;17:1527–1531.
    1. Cinzia DD. Gallese V. Neuroaesthetics: a review. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2009;19:682–687.
    1. Cook R, Bird G, Catmur C, Press C. Heyes C. Mirror neurons: from origin to function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2014;37:177–192.
    1. Cook R, Press C, Dickinson A. Heyes C. Acquisition of automatic imitation is sensitive to sensorimotor contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2010;36:840–852.
    1. Cooper RP, Cook R, Dickinson A. Heyes C. Associative (not Hebbian) learning and the mirror neuron system. Neuroscience Letters. 2012;540:28–36.
    1. Cross ES, Stadler W, Parkinson J, Schutz-Bosbach S. Prinz W. The influence of visual training on predicting complex action sequences. Human Brain Mapping. 2013;34:467–486.
    1. Del Giudice M, Manera V. Keysers C. Programmed to learn? The ontogeny of mirror neurons. Developmental Science. 2009;12:350–363.
    1. Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G. Rizzolatti G. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1995;73:2608–2611.
    1. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L. Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain. 1996;119:593–609.
    1. Gallese V, Keysers C. Rizzolatti G. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004;8:396–403.
    1. Galloway JC. Thelen E. Feet first: object exploration in young infants. Infant Behavior and Development. 2004;27:107–112.
    1. Hari R, Forss N, Avikainen S, Kireveskari E, Salenius S. Rizzolatti G. Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95:15061–15065.
    1. Hari R. Salmelin R. Human cortical oscillations: a neuromagnetic view through the skull. Trends in Neurosciences. 1997;20:44–49.
    1. Heyes CM. Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2001;5:253–261.
    1. Heyes C, Bird G, Johnson H. Haggard P. Experience modulates automatic imitation. Cognitive Brain Research. 2005;22:233–240.
    1. Keysers C. Perrett DI. Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004;8:501–507.
    1. Landmann C, Landi SM, Grafton ST. Della-Maggiore V. fMRI supports the sensorimotor theory of motor resonance. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26859.
    1. Lepage JF. Théoret H. The mirror neuron system: grasping others’ actions from birth? Developmental Science. 2007;10:513–523.
    1. Marshall PJ, Bar-Haim Y. Fox NA. Development of the EEG from 5 months to 4 years of age. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2002;113:1199–1208.
    1. Marshall PJ, Young T. Meltzoff AN. Neural correlates of action observation and execution in 14-month-old infants: an event-related EEG desynchronization study. Developmental Science. 2011;14:474–480.
    1. Meltzoff AN. Decety J. What imitation tells us about social cognition: a rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, Biological Sciences. 2003;358:491–500.
    1. Meltzoff AN. Moore MK. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science. 1977;198:75–78.
    1. Nielsen JB. How we walk: central control of muscle activity during human walking. Neuroscientists. 2003;9:195–204.
    1. Nyström P, Ljunghammar T, Rosander K. von Hofsten C. Using mu rhythm desynchronization to measure mirror neuron activity in infants. Developmental Science. 2011;14:327–335.
    1. Paulus M, Hunnius S, van Elk M. Bekkering H. How learning to shake a rattle affects 8-month-old infants’ perception of the rattle's sound: electrophysiological evidence for action–effect binding in infancy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 2012;2:90–96.
    1. Perry A. Bentin S. Mirror activity in the human brain while observing hand movements: a comparison between EEG desynchronization in the μ- range and previous fMRI results. Brain Research. 2009;1282:126–132.
    1. Petroni A, Baguear F. Della-Maggiore V. Motor resonance may originate from sensorimotor experience. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2010;104:1867–1871.
    1. Pfurtscheller G. Neuper C. Motor imagery activates primary sensorimotor area in humans. Neuroscience Letters. 1997;239:65–68.
    1. Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C, Andrew C. Edlinger G. Foot and hand area mu rhythms. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 1997;26:121–135.
    1. Pineda JA. The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating ‘seeing’ and ‘hearing’ into ‘doing’. Brain Research Reviews. 2005;50:57–68.
    1. Pineda JO. Oberman LM. What goads cigarette smokers to smoke? Neural adaptation and the mirror neuron system. Brain Research. 2006;1121:128–135.
    1. Press C, Gillmeister H. Heyes CM. Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences. 2007;274:2509–2514.
    1. Ritter P, Moosmann M. Villringer A. Rolandic alpha and beta EEG rhythms’ strengths are inversely related to fMRI-BOLD signal in primary somatosensory and motor cortex. Human Brain Mapping. 2009;30:1168–1187.
    1. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V. From mirror neurons to imitation: facts and speculations. In: Meltzoff AN, Prinz W, editors. The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002. pp. 247–266.
    1. Salmelin R. Hari R. Characterization of spontaneous MEG rhythms in healthy adults. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1994;91:237–248.
    1. Simpson EA, Murray L, Paukner A. Ferrari PF. The mirror neuron system as revealed through neonatal imitation: presence from birth, predictive power and evidence of plasticity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2014;369:20130289.
    1. Southgate V. Begus K. Motor activation during the prediction of nonexecutable actions in infants. Psychological Science. 2013;24:828–835.
    1. Southgate V, Johnson MH, El Karoui I. Csibra G. Motor system activation reveals infants’ online prediction of others’ goals. Psychological Science. 2010;21:355–359.
    1. Southgate V, Johnson MH, Osborne T. Csibra G. Predictive motor activation during action observation in human infants. Biology Letters. 2009;5:769–772.
    1. Stroganova TA, Orekhova EV. Posikera IN. EEG alpha rhythm in infants. Clinical Neurophysiology. 1999;110:997–1012.
    1. Tabachnick BG. Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education; 2007.
    1. Thelen E. Treadmill-elicited stepping in seven-month-old infants. Child Development. 1986;57:1498–1506.
    1. van Elk M, van Schie HT, Hunnius S, Vesper C. Bekkering H. You'll never crawl alone: neurophysiological evidence for experience-dependent motor resonance in infancy. NeuroImage. 2008;43:808–814.
    1. Vereijken B. Thelen E. Training infant treadmill stepping: the role of individual pattern stability. Developmental Psychobiology. 1997;30:89–102.
    1. Virji-Babul N, Rose A, Moiseeva N. Makan N. Neural correlates of action understanding in infants: influence of motor experience. Brain and Behavior. 2012;2:237–242.
    1. Wiggett AJ, Hudson M, Tipper SP. Downing PE. Learning associations between action and perception: effects of incompatible training on body part and spatial priming. Brain and Cognition. 2011;76:87–96.
    1. Yang JF. Gorassini M. Spinal and brain control of human walking: implications for retraining of walking. Neuroscientist. 2006;12:379–389.
    1. Yang JF, Stephens MJ. Vishram R. Infant stepping: a method to study the sensory control of human walking. Journal of Physiology. 1998;507:927–937.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir