Cut-Off Points for Mild, Moderate, and Severe Pain on the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Variability and Influence of Sex and Catastrophizing

Anne M Boonstra, Roy E Stewart, Albère J A Köke, René F A Oosterwijk, Jeannette L Swaan, Karlein M G Schreurs, Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper, Anne M Boonstra, Roy E Stewart, Albère J A Köke, René F A Oosterwijk, Jeannette L Swaan, Karlein M G Schreurs, Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper

Abstract

Objectives: The 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is often used in pain management. The aims of our study were to determine the cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain in terms of pain-related interference with functioning in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, to measure the variability of the optimal cut-off points, and to determine the influence of patients' catastrophizing and their sex on these cut-off points. Methods: 2854 patients were included. Pain was assessed by the NRS, functioning by the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and catastrophizing by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Cut-off point schemes were tested using ANOVAs with and without using the PSC scores or sex as co-variates and with the interaction between CP scheme and PCS score and sex, respectively. The variability of the optimal cut-off point schemes was quantified using bootstrapping procedure. Results and conclusion: The study showed that NRS scores ≤ 5 correspond to mild, scores of 6-7 to moderate and scores ≥8 to severe pain in terms of pain-related interference with functioning. Bootstrapping analysis identified this optimal NRS cut-off point scheme in 90% of the bootstrapping samples. The interpretation of the NRS is independent of sex, but seems to depend on catastrophizing. In patients with high catastrophizing tendency, the optimal cut-off point scheme equals that for the total study sample, but in patients with a low catastrophizing tendency, NRS scores ≤ 3 correspond to mild, scores of 4-6 to moderate and scores ≥7 to severe pain in terms of interference with functioning. In these optimal cut-off schemes, NRS scores of 4 and 5 correspond to moderate interference with functioning for patients with low catastrophizing tendency and to mild interference for patients with high catastrophizing tendency. Theoretically one would therefore expect that among the patients with NRS scores 4 and 5 there would be a higher average PDI score for those with low catastrophizing than for those with high catastrophizing. However, we found the opposite. The fact that we did not find the same optimal CP scheme in the subgroups with lower and higher catastrophizing tendency may be due to chance variability.

Keywords: chronic pain; classification; musculoskeletal pain; numeric rating scale; pain interference.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplots of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) scores by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score for average pain during the last week for the patients with low and high catastrophizing tendency (i.e., lower or higher than the median of the total scorer on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), viz. 29).

References

    1. Aaronson N. K., Muller M., Cohen P. D. A., Essenk-Bot M.-L., Fekkes M., Sanderman R., et al. . (1998). Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 health survey in community and chronic disease populations. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 51, 1055–1068. 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00097-3
    1. Boonstra A. M., Schiphorst Preuper H. R., Balk G. A., Stewart R. E. (2014). Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain 155, 2545–2550. 10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.014
    1. Brailo V., Zakrzewska J. M. (2015). Grading the intensity of nondental orofacial pain: identification of cutoff points for mild, moderate and severe pain. J. Pain Res. 8, 95–104. 10.2147/JPR.S75192
    1. Breivik E. K., Björnsson G. A., Skovlund E. (2000). A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin. J. Pain 16, 22–28. 10.1097/00002508-200003000-00005
    1. Dworkin R. H., Turk D. C., Farrar J. T., Haythornthwaite J. A., Jensen M. P., Katz N. P., et al. . (2005). Core outome measures for chronic pain in clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 113, 9–19. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012
    1. Fejer R., Jordan A., Hartvigsen J. (2005). Categorising the severity of neck pain: establishment of cut-points for use in clinical and epidemiological research. Pain 119, 176–182. 10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.033
    1. Ferreira K. A., Teixeira M. J., Mendonza T. R., Cleeland C. S. (2011). Validation of brief pain inventory to Brazilian patients with pain. Support. Care Cancer 19, 505–511. 10.1007/s00520-010-0844-7
    1. Hanley M. A., Masedo A., Jensen M. P., Cardenas D., Turner J. A. (2006). Pain interference in persons with spinal cord injury: classification of mild, moderate, and severe pain. J. Pain 7, 129–133. 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.09.011
    1. Hirschfeld G., Zernikow B. (2013). Variability of “optimal” cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain: neglected problems when comparing groups. Pain 154, 154–159. 10.1016/j.pain.2012.10.008
    1. Hoffman D. L., Sadosky A., Dukes E. M., Alvir J. (2010). How do changes in pain severity levels correspond to changes in health status and function in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Pain 149, 194–201. 10.1016/j.pain.2009.09.017
    1. Jensen M. P., Turner J. A., Romano J. M., Fisher L. D. (1999). Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain 83, 157–162. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00101-3
    1. Kalyadina S. A., Ionova T. I., Ivanova M. O., Uspenskaya O. S., Kishtovich A. V., Mendoza T. R., et al. . (2008). Russian brief pain inventory: validation and application in cancer pain. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 35, 95–102. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.042
    1. Kapstad H., Hanestad B. R., Langeland N., Rustøen T., Stavem K. (2008). Cutpoints for mild, moderate and severe pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee ready for joint replacement surgery. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 9:55. 10.1186/1471-2474-9-55
    1. Li K. K., Harris K., Hadi S., Chow E. (2007). What should be the optimal cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain? J. Palliat. Med. 10, 1338–1346. 10.1089/jpm.2007.0087
    1. Oldenmenger W. H., de Raaf P. J., de Klerk C., van der Rijt C. C. (2013). Cut points on 0–10 numeric rating scales for symptoms included in the edmonton symptom assessment scale in cancer patients: a systematic review. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 45, 1083–1093. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.06.007
    1. Osman A., Barrios F. X., Kopper B. A., Hauptmann W., Jones J., O'Neill E. (1997). Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J. Behav. Med. 20, 589–605. 10.1023/A:1025570508954
    1. Paul S. M., Zelman D. C., Smith M., Miaskowski C. (2005). Categorizing the severity of cancer pain: further exploration of the establishment of cutpoints. Pain 113, 37–44. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.014
    1. Racine M., Tousignant-Laflamme Y., Kloda L. A., Dion D., Dupuis G., Choinière M. (2012). A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception-part 1: are there really differences between women and men? Pain 153, 602–618. 10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.025
    1. Rollman G. B., Lautenbacher S. (2001). Sex differences in musculoskeletal pain. Clin. J. Pain 17, 20–24. 10.1097/00002508-200103000-00004
    1. Serlin R. C., Mendoza T. R., Nakamura Y., Edwards K. R., Cleeland C. S. (1995). When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function. Pain 61, 277–284. 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-H
    1. Soer R., Köke A. J., Vroomen P. C., Stegeman P., Smeets P. J., Coppes M. H., et al. . (2013). Extensive validation of the pain disability index in 3 groups of patients with musculoskeletal pain. Spine 38, E562–E568. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828af21f
    1. Turner J. A., Franklin G., Heagerty P. J., Wu R., Egan K., Fulton-Kehoe D., et al. . (2004). The association between pain and disability. Pain 112, 307–314. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.010
    1. Wertli M. M., Burgstaller J. M., Weiser S., Steurer J., Kofmehl R., Held U. (2014a). Influence of catastrophizing on treatment outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 39, 263–273. 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000110
    1. Wertli M. M., Eugster R., Held U., Steurer J., Kofmehl R., Weiser S. (2014b). Catastrophizing-a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J. 14, 2639–2657. 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.003
    1. Zelman D. C., Dukes E., Brandenburg N., Bostrom A., Gore M. (2005). Identification of cut-points for mild, moderate and severe pain due to diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Pain 115, 29–36. 10.1016/j.pain.2005.01.028
    1. Zelman D. C., Hoffman D. L., Seifeldin R., Dukes E. M. (2003). Development of a metric for a day of manageable pain control: derivation of pain severity cut-points for low back pain and osteoarthritis. Pain 106, 35–42. 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00274-4

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir