Individual effect-site concentrations of propofol are similar at loss of consciousness and at awakening

Hiroko Iwakiri, Noboru Nishihara, Osamu Nagata, Takashi Matsukawa, Makoto Ozaki, Daniel I Sessler, Hiroko Iwakiri, Noboru Nishihara, Osamu Nagata, Takashi Matsukawa, Makoto Ozaki, Daniel I Sessler

Abstract

Reported effect-site concentrations of propofol at loss of consciousness and recovery of consciousness vary widely. Thus, no single concentration based on a population average will prove optimal for individual patients. We therefore tested the hypothesis that individual propofol effect-site concentrations at loss and return of consciousness are similar. Propofol effect-site concentrations at loss and recovery of consciousness were estimated with a target-control infusion system in 20 adults. Propofol effect-site concentrations were gradually increased until the volunteers lost consciousness (no response to verbal stimuli); unconsciousness was maintained for 15 min, and the volunteers were then awakened. This protocol was repeated three times in each volunteer. Our major outcomes were the concentration producing unconsciousness and the relationship between the estimated effect-site concentrations at loss and recovery of consciousness. The target effect-site propofol concentration was 2.0 +/- 0.9 at loss of consciousness and 1.8 +/- 0.7 at return of consciousness (P <0.001). The average difference between individual effect-site concentrations at return and loss of consciousness was only 0.17 +/- 0.32 microg/mL (95% confidence interval for the difference 0.09-0.25 microg/mL). Our results thus suggest that individual titration to loss of consciousness is an alternative to dosing propofol on the basis of average population requirements.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
When the results from the three trials were combined, there was an excellent correlation between the effect-site concentration at loss of consciousness (LOC) and return of consciousness (ROC) in individual volunteers with ROC being slightly lower than LOC on average. Each response was elicited three times from each volunteer; thus on the graph, all three of the highest lines were from the same individual and all three of the lowest from another individual.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir