Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation: Time to Bring Subclavian Central Lines Back

Talayeh Rezayat, Jeffrey R Stowell, John L Kendall, Elizabeth Turner, J Christian Fox, Igor Barjaktarevic, Talayeh Rezayat, Jeffrey R Stowell, John L Kendall, Elizabeth Turner, J Christian Fox, Igor Barjaktarevic

Abstract

Despite multiple advantages, subclavian vein (SCV) cannulation via the traditional landmark approach has become less used in comparison to ultrasound (US) guided internal jugular catheterization due to a higher rate of mechanical complications. A growing body of evidence indicates that SCV catheterization with real-time US guidance can be accomplished safely and efficiently. While several cannulation approaches with real-time US guidance have been described, available literature suggests that the infraclavicular, longitudinal "in-plane" technique may be preferred. This approach allows for direct visualization of needle advancement, which reduces risk of complications and improves successful placement. Infraclavicular SCV cannulation requires simultaneous use of US during needle advancement, but for an inexperienced operator, it is more easily learned compared to the traditional landmark approach. In this article, we review the evidence supporting the use of US guidance for SCV catheterization and discuss technical aspects of the procedure itself.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A) Short axis view of subclavian vein using ultrasound vascular probe. B) Long axis view of subclavian vein using ultrasound vascular probe. SCV, subclavian vein; SCA, subclavian artery
Figure 2
Figure 2
A) Linear transducer is placed perpendicularly and inferior to clavicle. B) Identified anatomical structures include the transverse (short axis) view of subclavian vein (SCV), subclavian artery (SCA) and pleura. C) With SCV centrally positioned, the transducer is rotated 90° clockwise until D) longitudinal view of subclavian vein is obtained. E) Pulse-wave Doppler view of the SCV confirms non-pulsatile flow and identifies the vessel. F) Tilting the transducer cephalad enables the visualization and identification of SCA with pulse-wave Doppler ultrasound for better anatomic orientation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A) After identification and in-plane alignment of subclavian vein (SCV) on ultrasound, the insertion needle enters the skin at midpoint of the transducer’s small footprint and is advanced within the plane of ultrasound penetration. B), C) and D) The transducer remains in steady position enabling continuous longitudinal view of SCV, and the needle is carefully and slowly introduced with maintenance of needle visualization until the anterior wall of SCV is punctured.

References

    1. Aubaniac R. Subclavian intravenous injection; advantages and technic. La Presse medicale. 1952;60(68):1456.
    1. Marik PE, Flemmer M, Harrison W. The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheters as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(8):2479–85.
    1. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. New Engl J Med. 2003;348(12):1123–33.
    1. Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;286(6):700–7.
    1. O’Grady NP. Zero risk for central line-associated bloodstream infections ... Is this realistic? Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):657–8.
    1. Ruesch S, Walder B, Tramer MR. Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access--a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(2):454–60.
    1. Shah ASA, Panchatsharam S. Ultrasound-guided subclavian venous catheterisation - is this the way forward? A narrative review. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67(8):726–32.
    1. Stachura MR, Socransky SJ, Wiss R, et al. A comparison of the supraclavicular and infraclavicular views for imaging the subclavian vein with ultrasound. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(8):905–8.
    1. Brass P, Hellmich M, Kolodziej L, et al. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD011447.
    1. Fragou M, Gravvanis A, Dimitriou V, et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the landmark method in critical care patients: a prospective randomized study. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(7):1607–12.
    1. Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, et al. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med. 1996;24(12):2053–8.
    1. Timsit JF. What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients? Crit Care. 2003;7(6):397–9.
    1. Miller AH, Roth BA, Mills TJ, et al. Ultrasound guidance versus the landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheters in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(8):800–5.
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. NICE technology appraisal guidance No 49: guidance on the use of ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheters. London: NICE; Sep, 2002. Available at: 2002.
    1. American College of Emergency P. Emergency ultrasound imaging criteria compendium. American College of Emergency Physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(4):487–510.
    1. Vogel JA, Haukoos JS, Erickson CL, et al. Is Long-Axis View Superior to Short-Axis View in Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization? Crit Care Med. 2014
    1. Lalu MM, Fayad A, Ahmed O, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Subclavian Vein Catheterization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(7):1498–507.
    1. Sommerkamp SK, Romaniuk VM, Witting MD, et al. A comparison of longitudinal and transverse approaches to ultrasound-guided axillary vein cannulation. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(3):478–81.
    1. Byon HJ, Lee GW, Lee JH, et al. Comparison between ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches for subclavian venous catheterization in children--a randomized trial. Brit J Anaesthes. 2013;111(5):788–92.
    1. Hussain S, Ahmad Khan R, Iqbal M, et al. A comparative study of supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach for central venous catheterization. Anaesth, Pain & Intens Care. 2011;15(1)
    1. Yoffa D. Supraclavicular subclavian venepuncture and catheterisation. Lancet. 1965;2(7413):614–7.
    1. Sterner S, Plummer DW, Clinton J, et al. A comparison of the supraclavicular approach and the infraclavicular approach for subclavian vein catheterization. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(4):421–4.
    1. Tokumine J, Matsushima H, Lefor AK, et al. Ultrasound-guided subclavian venipuncture is more rapidly learned than the anatomic landmark technique in simulation training. J Vasc Access. 2014
    1. Mallin M, Louis H, Madsen T. A novel technique for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian cannulation. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28(8):966–9.
    1. Oh AY, Jeon YT, Choi EJ, et al. The influence of the direction of J-tip on the placement of a subclavian catheter: real time ultrasound-guided cannulation versus landmark method, a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiology. 2014;14:11.
    1. Sandhu NS. Transpectoral ultrasound-guided catheterization of the axillary vein: an alternative to standard catheterization of the subclavian vein. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(1):183–7.
    1. Stefanidis K, Fragou M, Pentilas N, et al. Optimization of Cannula Visibility during Ultrasound-Guided Subclavian Vein Catheterization, via a Longitudinal Approach, by Implementing Echogenic Technology. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:617149.
    1. Alic YTAaPA. Ultrasound-guided catheterization of the subclavian vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in ICU patients. Crit Care. 2009;13(Suppl 1):P198.
    1. Palepu GB, Deven J, Subrahmanyam M, et al. Impact of ultrasonography on central venous catheter insertion in intensive care. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2009;19(3):191–8.
    1. Gualtieri E, Deppe SA, Sipperly ME, et al. Subclavian venous catheterization: greater success rate for less experienced operators using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med. 1995;23(4):692–7.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir