Hydroxychloroquine in Nonhospitalized Adults With Early COVID-19 : A Randomized Trial

Caleb P Skipper, Katelyn A Pastick, Nicole W Engen, Ananta S Bangdiwala, Mahsa Abassi, Sarah M Lofgren, Darlisha A Williams, Elizabeth C Okafor, Matthew F Pullen, Melanie R Nicol, Alanna A Nascene, Kathy H Hullsiek, Matthew P Cheng, Darlette Luke, Sylvain A Lother, Lauren J MacKenzie, Glen Drobot, Lauren E Kelly, Ilan S Schwartz, Ryan Zarychanski, Emily G McDonald, Todd C Lee, Radha Rajasingham, David R Boulware, Caleb P Skipper, Katelyn A Pastick, Nicole W Engen, Ananta S Bangdiwala, Mahsa Abassi, Sarah M Lofgren, Darlisha A Williams, Elizabeth C Okafor, Matthew F Pullen, Melanie R Nicol, Alanna A Nascene, Kathy H Hullsiek, Matthew P Cheng, Darlette Luke, Sylvain A Lother, Lauren J MacKenzie, Glen Drobot, Lauren E Kelly, Ilan S Schwartz, Ryan Zarychanski, Emily G McDonald, Todd C Lee, Radha Rajasingham, David R Boulware

Abstract

Background: No effective oral therapy exists for early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Objective: To investigate whether hydroxychloroquine could reduce COVID-19 severity in adult outpatients.

Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from 22 March through 20 May 2020. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04308668).

Setting: Internet-based trial across the United States and Canada (40 states and 3 provinces).

Participants: Symptomatic, nonhospitalized adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 or probable COVID-19 and high-risk exposure within 4 days of symptom onset.

Intervention: Oral hydroxychloroquine (800 mg once, followed by 600 mg in 6 to 8 hours, then 600 mg daily for 4 more days) or masked placebo.

Measurements: Symptoms and severity at baseline and then at days 3, 5, 10, and 14 using a 10-point visual analogue scale. The primary end point was change in overall symptom severity over 14 days.

Results: Of 491 patients randomly assigned to a group, 423 contributed primary end point data. Of these, 341 (81%) had laboratory-confirmed infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or epidemiologically linked exposure to a person with laboratory-confirmed infection; 56% (236 of 423) were enrolled within 1 day of symptoms starting. Change in symptom severity over 14 days did not differ between the hydroxychloroquine and placebo groups (difference in symptom severity: relative, 12%; absolute, -0.27 point [95% CI, -0.61 to 0.07 point]; P = 0.117). At 14 days, 24% (49 of 201) of participants receiving hydroxychloroquine had ongoing symptoms compared with 30% (59 of 194) receiving placebo (P = 0.21). Medication adverse effects occurred in 43% (92 of 212) of participants receiving hydroxychloroquine versus 22% (46 of 211) receiving placebo (P < 0.001). With placebo, 10 hospitalizations occurred (2 non-COVID-19-related), including 1 hospitalized death. With hydroxychloroquine, 4 hospitalizations occurred plus 1 nonhospitalized death (P = 0.29).

Limitation: Only 58% of participants received SARS-CoV-2 testing because of severe U.S. testing shortages.

Conclusion: Hydroxychloroquine did not substantially reduce symptom severity in outpatients with early, mild COVID-19.

Primary funding source: Private donors.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M20-4207.

Figures

Visual Abstract.. Hydroxychloroquine in Nonhospitalized Adults With…
Visual Abstract.. Hydroxychloroquine in Nonhospitalized Adults With Early COVID-19
There is no known effective oral therapy for early COVID-19. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated effects of oral hydroxychloroquine on symptoms and disease severity in adult outpatients with early COVID-19.
Figure 1.. Study flow diagram.
Figure 1.. Study flow diagram.
Eligible participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive masked placebo or hydroxychloroquine, 800 mg (4 tablets) once, then 600 mg (3 tablets) in 6–8 h, then 600 mg (3 tablets) daily for 4 more days. Persons who were exposed to a contact with a positive result on a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and who remained asymptomatic (n = 821) were enrolled in our companion trial on postexposure prophylaxis (11); however, 100 persons became symptomatic before receiving study medicine on day 1 and were included in this early treatment trial, as per the protocol-specified plan. Of these, 81 met the U.S. coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case definition on day 1 on the basis of their symptom complex, whereas 19 were possible COVID-19 on day 1 (10). Most of the 2237 symptomatic persons who were ineligible had >4 d of symptoms (55%) or did not have access to PCR testing (41%). PrEP = preexposure prophylaxis.
Figure 2.. Venn diagram of qualification for…
Figure 2.. Venn diagram of qualification for study enrollment.
Venn diagram showing the distribution of how 378 participants qualified for enrollment. Two of 3 major symptoms were from among cough, shortness of breath, and fever. An additional 26 participants qualified by having pending (or unavailable) PCR tests at entry, having symptoms compatible with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and meeting the case definition after adjudication by an infectious disease physician (10). Five persons later reported PCR-positive contact, with test results returning after enrollment. In addition, 19 initially asymptomatic persons who had been randomly assigned in the postexposure prophylaxis trial (11) developed new symptoms on day 1 but not 2 of 3 major symptoms. Figure 5 shows hierarchical outcomes by confirmed PCR positive, contact PCR positive, or probable case only. PCR = polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 3.. Percentage of participants with ongoing…
Figure 3.. Percentage of participants with ongoing COVID-19 symptoms.
The percentage of participants reporting symptoms over time did not statistically differ by use of hydroxychloroquine or placebo. By day 14, the proportion of hydroxychloroquine participants with symptoms was 6 percentage points less than that of placebo participants (24% vs. 30%; P = 0.21). The stacked bar graph distinguishes the relative proportions of those with presentation of cough, fever, or shortness of breath vs. other COVID-19–related symptoms. Exact percentages can be found in Supplement Figure 2. COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019.
Figure 4.. Overall symptom severity score over…
Figure 4.. Overall symptom severity score over 14 d.
At each visit, participants reported their overall severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms on a continuous visual analogue scale of 0–10 points. The primary end point (overall change in symptom severity score) was calculated with linear mixed-effects models, adjusted for baseline severity score. Hydroxychloroquine was associated with a 12% relative difference over placebo, based on an absolute difference of −0.27 (95% CI, −0.61 to 0.07; P = 0.117) on the visual analogue scale. Supplement Table 4) shows mean values and 95% CIs. At day 5, symptom severity had worsened from baseline in 16% of participants receiving hydroxychloroquine and 20% of those receiving placebo.
Figure 5.. Change in symptom severity score…
Figure 5.. Change in symptom severity score over 14 d, by a priori subgroups.
Mean change from baseline and estimated difference from a longitudinal mixed model adjusted for baseline severity score. P values for trend of continuous variables are in parentheses. Subgroups were defined a priori in the protocol. The final diagnosis includes all diagnostic testing results during the study period. Probable diagnosis is based on the U.S. clinical case definition (10). The final diagnosis categories are hierarchical as listed (and thus mutually exclusive). Participants with symptom duration of 1–2 d before enrollment in the hydroxychloroquine group had a larger reduction in symptom score than those receiving placebo, but this was not observed in those who enrolled with symptom durations <1 d, where one might expect an even greater effect if hydroxychloroquine therapy helped mitigate disease severity if started very early in the disease course. Additional post hoc subgroups of medication adherence, zinc, and vitamin C are presented in Supplement Table 2.

References

    1. Yao X, Ye F, Zhang M, et al. In vitro antiviral activity and projection of optimized dosing design of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin Infect Dis. 2020. [PMID: 32150618] doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa237
    1. Pastick KA, Okafor EC, Wang F, et al. Review: hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7:ofaa130. [PMID: 32363212] doi:10.1093/ofid/ofaa130
    1. Million M, Lagier JC, Gautret P, et al. Early treatment of COVID-19 patients with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: a retrospective analysis of 1061 cases in Marseille, France. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;35:101738. [PMID: 32387409] doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101738
    1. Geleris J, Sun Y, Platt J, et al. Observational study of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2411-2418. [PMID: 32379955] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2012410
    1. Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE, et al; ACTT-1 Study Group Members. Remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19 — preliminary report. N Engl J Med. 2020. [PMID: 32445440] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2007764
    1. Wang Y, Zhang D, Du G, et al. Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2020;395:1569-1578. [PMID: 32423584] doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31022-9
    1. Lother SA, Abassi M, Agostinis A, et al. Post-exposure prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): study protocol for a pragmatic randomized-controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2020. [PMID: 32383125] doi:10.1007/s12630-020-01684-7
    1. Kucirka LM, Lauer SA, Laeyendecker O, et al. Variation in false-negative rate of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction-based SARS-CoV-2 tests by time since exposure. Ann Intern Med. 2020. [PMID: 32422057] doi:10.7326/M20-1495
    1. Cheng MP, Papenburg J, Desjardins M, et al. Diagnostic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172:726-734. [PMID: 32282894] doi:10.7326/M20-1301
    1. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. Interim-20-ID-01: standardized surveillance case definition and national notification for 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Accessed at on 20 April 2020.
    1. Boulware DR, Pullen MF, Bangdiwala AS, et al. A randomized trial of hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis for Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020. [PMID: 32492293] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2016638
    1. Al-Kofahi M, Jacobson P, Boulware DR, et al. Finding the dose for hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis for COVID-19: the desperate search for effectiveness. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020. [PMID: 32344449] doi:10.1002/cpt.1874
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. [PMID: 31078660] doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
    1. Burke RM, Midgley CM, Dratch A, et al. Active monitoring of persons exposed to patients with confirmed COVID-19 — United States, January–February 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:245-246. [PMID: 32134909] doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6909e1
    1. World Health Organization. Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). February 2020. Accessed at on 9 March 2020.
    1. Nicholson KG, Aoki FY, Osterhaus AD, et al. Efficacy and safety of oseltamivir in treatment of acute influenza: a randomised controlled trial. Neuraminidase Inhibitor Flu Treatment Investigator Group. Lancet. 2000;355:1845-50. [PMID: 10866439]
    1. Treanor JJ, Hayden FG, Vrooman PS, et al. Efficacy and safety of the oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir in treating acute influenza: a randomized controlled trial. US Oral Neuraminidase Study Group. JAMA. 2000;283:1016-24. [PMID: 10697061]
    1. Horby P, Mafham M, Linsell L, et al. Effect of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: preliminary results from a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial. medRxiv. Preprint posted online 15 July 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.07.15.20151852
    1. World Health Organization. Q&A : hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19. 19 June 2020. Accessed at on 19 June 2020.
    1. 20. Kaptein SJF, Jacobs S, Langendries L, et al. Antiviral treatment of SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters reveals a weak effect of favipiravir and a complete lack of effect for hydroxychloroquine. bioRxiv. Preprint posted online 19 June 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.06.19.159053
    1. Park SJ, Yu KM, Kim YI, et al. Antiviral efficacies of FDA-approved drugs against SARS-CoV-2 infection in ferrets. mBio. 2020;11. [PMID: 32444382] doi:10.1128/mBio.01114-20
    1. Maisonnasse P, Guedj J, Contreras V, et al. Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment and prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-human primates. Research Square. Preprint posted online 6 May 2020. doi:10.21203/-27223/v1
    1. McMichael TM, Currie DW, Clark S, et al; Public Health–Seattle and King County, EvergreenHealth, and CDC COVID-19 Investigation Team. Epidemiology of Covid-19 in a long-term care facility in King County, Washington. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2005-2011. [PMID: 32220208] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2005412
    1. Ross SB, Wilson MG, Papillon-Ferland L, et al. COVID-SAFER: deprescribing guidance for hydroxychloroquine drug interactions in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020. [PMID: 32441771] doi:10.1111/jgs.16623
    1. World Health Organization. Global surveillance for human infection with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). 20 March 2020. Accessed at ) on 20 March 2020.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir