Impact of Booster Breaks and Computer Prompts on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among Desk-Based Workers: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

Wendell C Taylor, Raheem J Paxton, Ross Shegog, Sharon P Coan, Allison Dubin, Timothy F Page, David M Rempel, Wendell C Taylor, Raheem J Paxton, Ross Shegog, Sharon P Coan, Allison Dubin, Timothy F Page, David M Rempel

Abstract

Introduction: The 15-minute work break provides an opportunity to promote health, yet few studies have examined this part of the workday. We studied physical activity and sedentary behavior among office workers and compared the results of the Booster Break program with those of a second intervention and a control group to determine whether the Booster Break program improved physical and behavioral health outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a 3-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial at 4 worksites in Texas from 2010 through 2013 to compare a group-based, structured Booster Break program to an individual-based computer-prompt intervention and a usual-break control group; we analyzed physiologic, behavioral, and employee measures such as work social support, quality of life, and perceived stress. We also identified consistent and inconsistent attendees of the Booster Break sessions.

Results: We obtained data from 175 participants (mean age, 43 y; 67% racial/ethnic minority). Compared with the other groups, the consistent Booster Break attendees had greater weekly pedometer counts (P < .001), significant decreases in sedentary behavior and self-reported leisure-time physical activity (P < .001), and a significant increase in triglyceride concentrations (P = .02) (levels remained within the normal range). Usual-break participants significantly increased their body mass index, whereas Booster Break participants maintained body mass index status during the 6 months. Overall, Booster Break participants were 6.8 and 4.3 times more likely to have decreases in BMI and weekend sedentary time, respectively, than usual-break participants.

Conclusion: Findings varied among the 3 study groups; however, results indicate the potential for consistent attendees of the Booster Break intervention to achieve significant, positive changes related to physical activity, sedentary behavior, and body mass index.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Stages of the Booster Break study for intent-to-treat analyses (all participants); 100% of participants were analyzed using intent-to-treat.

References

    1. Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Cooper PS, Brown LM, Lusk SL. Meta-analysis of workplace physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med 2009;37(4):330–9. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.008
    1. Barr-Anderson DJ, AuYoung M, Whitt-Glover MC, Glenn BA, Yancey AK. Integration of short bouts of physical activity into organizational routine a systematic review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 2011;40(1):76–93. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.033
    1. Buckley JP, Hedge A, Yates T, Copeland RJ, Loosemore M, Hamer M, et al. The sedentary office: an expert statement on the growing case for change towards better health and productivity. Br J Sports Med 2015;49(21):1357–62. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094618
    1. Taylor WC. Transforming work breaks to promote health. Am J Prev Med 2005;29(5):461–5. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.040
    1. Taylor WC, Shegog R, Chen V, Rempel DM, Baun MP, Bush CL, et al. The Booster Break program: description and feasibility test of a worksite physical activity daily practice. Work 2010;37(4):433–43.
    1. Taylor WC. Booster Breaks: an easy-to-implement workplace policy designed to improve employee health, increase productivity, and lower health care costs. J Workplace Behav Health 2011;26(1):70–84. 10.1080/15555240.2011.540991
    1. Taylor WC, King KE, Shegog R, Paxton RJ, Evans-Hudnall GL, Rempel DM, et al. Booster Breaks in the workplace: participants’ perspectives on health-promoting work breaks. Health Educ Res 2013;28(3):414–25. 10.1093/her/cyt001
    1. Taylor WC, Horan A, Pinion C Jr, Liehr P. Evaluation of Booster Breaks in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med 2014;56(5):529–34. 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000144
    1. World Health Organization. Healthy workplaces: a model for action: for employers, workers, policy-makers and practitioners. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization Press; 2010.
    1. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 9th edition. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
    1. Olds T, Stewart A, Carter L, Marfell-Jones M. International standards for anthropometric assessment. Potchefstroom (ZA): International Society for Advancement of Kinanthropometry; 2006.
    1. Garrow JS, Webster J. Quetelet’s index (W/H2) as a measure of fatness. Int J Obes 1985;9(2):147–53.
    1. Johnson JV, Hall EM, Ford DE, Mead LA, Levine DM, Wang NY, et al. The psychosocial work environment of physicians. The impact of demands and resources on job dissatisfaction and psychiatric distress in a longitudinal study of Johns Hopkins Medical School graduates. J Occup Environ Med 1995;37(9):1151–9. 10.1097/00043764-199509000-00018
    1. Weatherley BD, Chambless LE, Heiss G, Catellier DJ, Ellison CR. The reliability of the ankle-brachial index in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the NHLBI Family Heart Study (FHS). BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2006;6(1):7. 10.1186/1471-2261-6-7
    1. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, Cycle 2. Pulse and blood pressure procedures for household interviewers. . Accessed September 2, 2014.
    1. Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Karabulut M, Bassett DR Jr. Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35(8):1455–60. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078932.61440.A2
    1. Tudor-Locke C. A preliminary study to determine instrument responsiveness to change with a walking program: physical activity logs versus pedometers. Res Q Exerc Sport 2001;72(3):288–92. 10.1080/02701367.2001.10608962
    1. Welk GJ, Differding JA, Thompson RW, Blair SN, Dziura J, Hart P. The utility of the Digi-walker step counter to assess daily physical activity patterns. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32(9, Suppl):S481–8. 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00007
    1. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35(8):1381–95. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB
    1. Adams MA, Todd M, Kurka J, Conway TL, Cain KL, Frank LD, et al. Patterns of walkability, transit, and recreation environment for physical activity. Am J Prev Med 2015;49(6):878–87. 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.024
    1. Johnson JV, Hall EM, Ford DE, Mead LA, Levine DM, Wang NY, et al. The psychosocial work environment of physicians. The impact of demands and resources on job dissatisfaction and psychiatric distress in a longitudinal study of Johns Hopkins Medical School graduates. J Occup Environ Med 1995;37:1151–9.
    1. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34(3):220–33. 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003
    1. Cohen S, Williamson GM. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapan S, Oskamp S, editors. The social psychology of health: the Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1988. p. 31–67.
    1. Perez AD, Hirschman C. The changing racial and ethnic composition of the US population: emerging American identities. Popul Dev Rev 2009;35(1):1–51. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00260.x
    1. Eamranond PP, Legedza ATR, Diez-Roux AV, Kandula NR, Palmas W, Siscovick DS, et al. Association between language and risk factor levels among Hispanic adults with hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or diabetes. Am Heart J 2009;157(1):53–9. 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.015
    1. Landsbergis PA, Dobson M, Koutsouras G, Schnall P. Job strain and ambulatory blood pressure: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Am J Public Health 2013;103(3):e61–71. 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301153
    1. Cifuentes M, Boyer J, Gore R, d’Errico A, Scollin P, Tessler J, et al.; PHASE in Healthcare Research Team. Job strain predicts survey response in healthcare industry workers. Am J Ind Med 2008;51(4):281–9. 10.1002/ajim.20561
    1. 28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Worksite physical activity. . Accessed January 14, 2016.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir